Because it’s a myth, a fraud. Global temperatures have dropped since megalomaniac Al Gore released An Inconvenient Truth. But Barack Obama is looking for another way to impose his will upon all of us. Looks like he ran into a little road block.
At the G8 summit in Italy, Barack Obama was at his America bashing best, lambasting us from afar.
Well, maybe not quite over Barry. Even the G8 crowd, while agreeing in principle to addressing the scourge of global warming, they weren’t actually motivated to make any commitments to put lipstick on this pig. The thought of regulating, taxing, and generally making life more difficult for the their respective citizens in such economic times was not an appealing thought, given that the whole movement is a charade. What’s worse, China and India gave the G8 circus the proverbial finger by rejecting the idea of reducing anything.
Why should they? They reasonably argued, that after all this “problem” wasn’t caused by them, and there is no alternative in place that would allow the up and coming economic engines of these countries to continue to kick the legs out from the United States. So in the end, big plan Barry ran into the same obstacles other presidents have encountered. Well, can the U.S. take a unilateral hit perpetuating this fraud? Does Obama care? Does he realize the consequences of such an approach? Or does he just see the United States as a cancer that needs to be killed in order for the body global to heal? Any of those scenarios sound plausible.
It is all a big scam designed for America and other rivh countries to send money to the UN, it is a front for global socialism. I hope people wake up!
We need more CO2 in the atmosphere, not less. Using simple logic, historic observation and just a touch of common sense we can ask two revealing questions:
1) What is the likelihood the recent warming, and now cooling, we have been experiencing is caused by small variations of radiant output and magnetic field strength in the nearby star, which provides 99.9999% of our energy budget? In their technical reports, the IPCC admits it doesn’t have a clear and complete understanding how our nearby star drives our weather and climate over time. Furthermore, how might our likelihood estimate change should we observe other planets in our solar system warming and cooling coincident with earth?
2) What is the likelihood the recent warming, and now cooling, we have been experiencing is caused by infinitesimally increasing concentrations of an infinitesimal trace gas, which composes less than .04% of our atmosphere and has been shown by the IPCC to have a Global Warming Potential (GWP) several orders of magnitude smaller than most other atmospheric trace gases, especially water vapor, which has an atmospheric concentration ten times greater? Just as important, it has been shown that human activity is only responsible for 3% of this minute trace gas. What then is the likelihood that reducing the human activity which produces this minute trace gas will have any material impact on atmospheric concentrations over time?
Finally, what benefits might all living things on earth reap should this trace gas reach levels approaching 1000 PPM, where studies have shown it optimizes plant growth, with or without the help of humans? Professor Mann’s infamous “hockeystick” study and graphic of bristlecone growth proxy data shows conclusively that nothing has done more to “GREEN” the planet over the past few decades than moderate sun-driven warming in conjunction with a CO2 enriched atmosphere.
Might want to let Obama know. He seems to think that any carbon is bad carbon.
[...] global warming is a farce. I’m all for reducing pollution though. I want clean air. That actually makes more sense than [...]