Comments on: Taxes About To Skyrocket http://rjjrdq.com/2009/07/17/taxes-about-to-skyrocket/ Still good, still bad, and still absurd... Sun, 20 May 2012 19:49:46 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: admin http://rjjrdq.com/2009/07/17/taxes-about-to-skyrocket/comment-page-1/#comment-523 admin Tue, 21 Jul 2009 05:30:15 +0000 http://rjjrdq.com/?p=1171#comment-523 I couldn't take him anymore. As you see, I welcome opposing viewpoints and I'll debate anybody. He took advantage of the courtesy I extended to him. I opened this blog to good healthy debate, and he turned it into a grade school chat room. He's obnoxious, abusive, and just argues for the sake of arguing. He has no point. Must be the lawyer in him. I'm surprised you are as calm as you are considering the things he said to you. He was making ME angry with the kind of trash he was throwing at you. I blocked him. I think you're right. I think he turned off some readers. Maybe that's his game. Anyway, he's gone. I couldn’t take him anymore. As you see, I welcome opposing viewpoints and I’ll debate anybody. He took advantage of the courtesy I extended to him. I opened this blog to good healthy debate, and he turned it into a grade school chat room. He’s obnoxious, abusive, and just argues for the sake of arguing. He has no point. Must be the lawyer in him. I’m surprised you are as calm as you are considering the things he said to you. He was making ME angry with the kind of trash he was throwing at you. I blocked him. I think you’re right. I think he turned off some readers. Maybe that’s his game. Anyway, he’s gone.

]]> By: Goodtimepolitics http://rjjrdq.com/2009/07/17/taxes-about-to-skyrocket/comment-page-1/#comment-522 Goodtimepolitics Tue, 21 Jul 2009 04:52:06 +0000 http://rjjrdq.com/?p=1171#comment-522 All larrys is trying to do is tear down your blog so you won't get any viewers. He's been spamming my blog two three times a day calling me moran and racist and I see now he has started on you. All larrys is trying to do is tear down your blog so you won’t get any viewers. He’s been spamming my blog two three times a day calling me moran and racist and I see now he has started on you.

]]> By: admin http://rjjrdq.com/2009/07/17/taxes-about-to-skyrocket/comment-page-1/#comment-520 admin Tue, 21 Jul 2009 03:47:15 +0000 http://rjjrdq.com/?p=1171#comment-520 Larry you're a pointless troll. I don't blame Goodtimepolitics for blocking you. Get lost you jerk. Larry you’re a pointless troll. I don’t blame Goodtimepolitics for blocking you. Get lost you jerk.

]]> By: admin http://rjjrdq.com/2009/07/17/taxes-about-to-skyrocket/comment-page-/#comment-518 admin Tue, 21 Jul 2009 00:56:34 +0000 http://rjjrdq.com/?p=1171#comment-518 I agree with that definition. You said it wasn't a legal term. Yes it is. n. any formal business entity for profit. And around we go. I agree with that definition. You said it wasn’t a legal term. Yes it is. n. any formal business entity for profit. And around we go.

]]> By: Goodtimepolitics http://rjjrdq.com/2009/07/17/taxes-about-to-skyrocket/comment-page-1/#comment-516 Goodtimepolitics Mon, 20 Jul 2009 23:01:48 +0000 http://rjjrdq.com/?p=1171#comment-516 larrys did you know that its the top 50% of the American people that creates jobs? Did you also know that if you raise taxes on that 50% that they will pass that cost on down to the lower class and even to the poor on food stamps! I was just a the store and brought a pack of sunflower seeds that cost .50 cents yesterday and that same pack of seeds cost .69 cents today, a .19 cents increase. Companies are already feeling the inpact of the Obama policies! larrys did you know that its the top 50% of the American people that creates jobs? Did you also know that if you raise taxes on that 50% that they will pass that cost on down to the lower class and even to the poor on food stamps!
I was just a the store and brought a pack of sunflower seeds that cost .50 cents yesterday and that same pack of seeds cost .69 cents today, a .19 cents increase. Companies are already feeling the inpact of the Obama policies!

]]> By: Goodtimepolitics http://rjjrdq.com/2009/07/17/taxes-about-to-skyrocket/comment-page-1/#comment-513 Goodtimepolitics Mon, 20 Jul 2009 20:22:45 +0000 http://rjjrdq.com/?p=1171#comment-513 larrys: "So why are we supposed to be so damn scared of making high-income people FINALLY pay their fair share of taxes?" Top 50% of Wage Earners Pay 96.03% of Income Taxes The top 1% is paying more than ten times the federal income taxes than the bottom 50%! The bottom 50% is paying a tiny bit of the taxes, so you can't give them much of a tax cut by definition. Yet these are the people to whom the Democrats claim to want to give tax cuts. Remember this the next time you hear the "tax cuts for the rich" business. Understand that the so-called rich are about the only ones paying taxes anymore. http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/menu/top_50__of_wage_earners_pay_96_09__of_income_taxes.guest.html How about that larrys, do you want to keep begging for more handouts from the top 50% of wage earners? larrys: “So why are we supposed to be so damn scared of making high-income people FINALLY pay their fair share of taxes?”

Top 50% of Wage Earners Pay 96.03% of Income Taxes
The top 1% is paying more than ten times the federal income taxes than the bottom 50%! The bottom 50% is paying a tiny bit of the taxes, so you can’t give them much of a tax cut by definition. Yet these are the people to whom the Democrats claim to want to give tax cuts. Remember this the next time you hear the “tax cuts for the rich” business. Understand that the so-called rich are about the only ones paying taxes anymore.

http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/menu/top_50__of_wage_earners_pay_96_09__of_income_taxes.guest.html

How about that larrys, do you want to keep begging for more handouts from the top 50% of wage earners?

]]> By: rjjrdq http://rjjrdq.com/2009/07/17/taxes-about-to-skyrocket/comment-page-1/#comment-505 rjjrdq Mon, 20 Jul 2009 00:57:03 +0000 http://rjjrdq.com/?p=1171#comment-505 You're wrong mr. lawyer. Company is a legal term. It does not indicate a specific type of business entity, but it is a legal term, as opposed to conducting business, which doesn't require a business entity to exist. And that "If I reach one person" speech is just bullshit. I ask again, what's your game? You’re wrong mr. lawyer. Company is a legal term. It does not indicate a specific type of business entity, but it is a legal term, as opposed to conducting business, which doesn’t require a business entity to exist.

And that “If I reach one person” speech is just bullshit. I ask again, what’s your game?

]]> By: rjjrdq http://rjjrdq.com/2009/07/17/taxes-about-to-skyrocket/comment-page-1/#comment-501 rjjrdq Sun, 19 Jul 2009 23:53:13 +0000 http://rjjrdq.com/?p=1171#comment-501 Yes it is a legal term-round and round we go on a tangent again. I ask you again: What's your game? You're only dealing with a few people here. What's your goal, what's your purpose? Do you know how many people saw this post today? You and me. Maybe Goodtimepolitics. 6 billion people on the planet and maybe 3 people saw these comments today. This is my ship, so whether it sinks or floats is my fate. You, on the other hand seem to be wasting your skills here. Look at those comments. Those are bonafide blog posts. You could potentially be reaching more people than you do here. If you really feel you have something to say, then take my previous advice. You're wasting a lot of energy here. Yes it is a legal term-round and round we go on a tangent again. I ask you again: What’s your game? You’re only dealing with a few people here. What’s your goal, what’s your purpose? Do you know how many people saw this post today? You and me. Maybe Goodtimepolitics. 6 billion people on the planet and maybe 3 people saw these comments today.

This is my ship, so whether it sinks or floats is my fate. You, on the other hand seem to be wasting your skills here. Look at those comments. Those are bonafide blog posts. You could potentially be reaching more people than you do here. If you really feel you have something to say, then take my previous advice. You’re wasting a lot of energy here.

]]> By: rjjrdq http://rjjrdq.com/2009/07/17/taxes-about-to-skyrocket/comment-page-1/#comment-488 rjjrdq Sun, 19 Jul 2009 04:12:09 +0000 http://rjjrdq.com/?p=1171#comment-488 company Definition Any entity engaging in business, such as a proprietorship, partnership, or corporation. company
Definition
Any entity engaging in business, such as a proprietorship, partnership, or corporation.

]]> By: rjjrdq http://rjjrdq.com/2009/07/17/taxes-about-to-skyrocket/comment-page-1/#comment-486 rjjrdq Sat, 18 Jul 2009 22:47:41 +0000 http://rjjrdq.com/?p=1171#comment-486 I said companies, not corporations. Yes, Billy Bob can issue preferred shares in his s corp, but since preferred share holders have no voting rights, Old Billy can vote himself a bonus if he wants. This post is not a lesson in various business entities and how they are set up. Once again, we're splitting hairs and going off on a tangent. I'm not going to dissect anymore of it. larrys, what's your game? This isn't some big time blog with thousands of readers. You want to turn some heads? Try Gateway Pundit's blog. Those guys will jump into a steel cage with you. If you think I'M wrong, then you'll have a ball over there. There are many other blogs that draw far more readers than I do. So why here? I'm sure there are plenty of people out there that would be happy to nitpick semantics with you. Not me. See my disclaimer on the right. Some of your comments are long enough to qualify as a blog post. Why not go the extra mile and start your own blog? I said companies, not corporations. Yes, Billy Bob can issue preferred shares in his s corp, but since preferred share holders have no voting rights, Old Billy can vote himself a bonus if he wants. This post is not a lesson in various business entities and how they are set up. Once again, we’re splitting hairs and going off on a tangent. I’m not going to dissect anymore of it.

larrys, what’s your game? This isn’t some big time blog with thousands of readers. You want to turn some heads? Try Gateway Pundit’s blog. Those guys will jump into a steel cage with you. If you think I’M wrong, then you’ll have a ball over there. There are many other blogs that draw far more readers than I do. So why here? I’m sure there are plenty of people out there that would be happy to nitpick semantics with you. Not me. See my disclaimer on the right.

Some of your comments are long enough to qualify as a blog post. Why not go the extra mile and start your own blog?

]]>