India is an emerging economic power, and they aren’t about to destroy themselves based on a scam that has no basis in reality.
As if the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) wasn’t in flames already, this blow in theory should finish them off. Backed by the United Nations however, they may give the appearance of life a little while longer. The last straw of this scam for India came when the IPCC published a report on climate change stating the the Himalayan glaciers, something near and dear to India, would melt by 2035. This assertion was based on nothing; in fact the scientist that supposedly made this claim has emphatically denied he said anything like that. He never said it. That didn’t stop the IPCC from not only publishing the report, but doing it with full knowledge that the claims being made were either based on lies, or assertions not backed up by real data. Well, that would fall under the category of a lie as well. Okay then, the entire report was based on a lie. It was a bunch of crap, but that crap was the basis of the UN, fellow scammers like Barack Obama and others to bleed the world out of hundreds of billions of dollars in order to fight the non-existent threat of climate change. As I’ve said before, this is about wealth redistribution, not global warming or climate change, or whatever the hell they want to call it.
India’s environment minister Jairam Ramesh basically said that the IPCC was full of crap, and that India would no longer play along. They have officially dumped the IPCC, meaning they are no longer part of the UN panel, and will establish their own panel to investigate climate change. That should be interesting. Possibly more accurate, which shouldn’t take much effort. Ramesh basically called the IPCC and their Indian head goon Rajendra K. Pachauri a bunch of wing nuts who couldn’t tell a glacier from an ice cube. He was more diplomatic about it though.
“There is a fine line between climate science and climate evangelism,” Ramesh said. “I am for climate science.”
Yes, he is referring to the movement as some kind of religion, some kind of cult where followers will believe, even in the face of striking contradictory evidence, in the face of flat out lies, in the face of colder weather, in the face of…you get the picture. And so does India. Ramesh is not a stupid guy. Go check out his credentials. This is a huge blow for the UN, the IPCC, and the entire climate change fraud movement. Who will be the next to step up? It’s not a stretch to see that after Copenhagen, after this fiasco, that it will be much easier to step away from this scam without being labeled a pariah by other countries still on board with the fraud.
As Obama trudges through the snow in D.C., he must be wondering how he could possibly get cap and trade through at this point. Who would risk their careers-and their competency by voting for something like that now? Well, let him try and he may go down as either the most corrupt and deceitful president ever, or the most naive buffoon that ever lived at 1600 Pennsylvania ave.
You leave out the possibility of him being the most naive buffoon and the most corrupt and the most deceitful president ever. Don’t sell him short. He won the Nobel Prize. He can be both —yes he can!!!!
Yes, Mojo, that fraud won the Nobel Prize. Remember when that honor used to mean something?
Hopefully more countries (including the US) will follow India’s lead. And Mojo is right; Obama is the most corrupt, deceiptful, AND naive president.
They lost a country 1 billion strong. That is very good news.
So has whoever wrote this even read or taken a look at the AR4 (the 2007 IPCC report)?
It is 3000 pages long and the Himalayan glaciers prediction was simply information taken from a source lacking credibility. The proper prediction is covered in the first 1000 page volume. This is a simple error that is fixed by removing 2 sentences… Not a big deal. The report was put together by 450 volunteer authors and it is indeed 3000 pages of small print, there are bound to be a couple tiny errors. Try actually reading something from both sides before you make your mind up on an issue.
Very nice spin, although I don’t get how people can think the entire case of global warming rests on a prediction about the melting of the Himalayan Glaciers.
Phil Jones will back me up. He concedes that the earth IS NOT warming. Not to mention he “lost” any relevant data that could have proven global warming. How’s that for the other side?