Comments on: IPCC Fraud Too Much For India http://rjjrdq.com/2010/02/06/ipcc-fraud-too-much-for-india/ Still good, still bad, and still absurd... Fri, 23 Jul 2010 19:34:05 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 By: rjjrdq http://rjjrdq.com/2010/02/06/ipcc-fraud-too-much-for-india/comment-page-1/#comment-21497 rjjrdq Wed, 17 Mar 2010 01:28:05 +0000 http://rjjrdq.com/?p=2586#comment-21497 Phil Jones will back me up. He concedes that the earth IS NOT warming. Not to mention he "lost" any relevant data that could have proven global warming. How's that for the other side? Phil Jones will back me up. He concedes that the earth IS NOT warming. Not to mention he “lost” any relevant data that could have proven global warming. How’s that for the other side?

]]> By: Y0958 http://rjjrdq.com/2010/02/06/ipcc-fraud-too-much-for-india/comment-page-1/#comment-21494 Y0958 Tue, 16 Mar 2010 21:03:23 +0000 http://rjjrdq.com/?p=2586#comment-21494 So has whoever wrote this even read or taken a look at the AR4 (the 2007 IPCC report)? It is 3000 pages long and the Himalayan glaciers prediction was simply information taken from a source lacking credibility. The proper prediction is covered in the first 1000 page volume. This is a simple error that is fixed by removing 2 sentences... Not a big deal. The report was put together by 450 volunteer authors and it is indeed 3000 pages of small print, there are bound to be a couple tiny errors. Try actually reading something from both sides before you make your mind up on an issue. Very nice spin, although I don't get how people can think the entire case of global warming rests on a prediction about the melting of the Himalayan Glaciers. So has whoever wrote this even read or taken a look at the AR4 (the 2007 IPCC report)?

It is 3000 pages long and the Himalayan glaciers prediction was simply information taken from a source lacking credibility. The proper prediction is covered in the first 1000 page volume. This is a simple error that is fixed by removing 2 sentences… Not a big deal. The report was put together by 450 volunteer authors and it is indeed 3000 pages of small print, there are bound to be a couple tiny errors. Try actually reading something from both sides before you make your mind up on an issue.

Very nice spin, although I don’t get how people can think the entire case of global warming rests on a prediction about the melting of the Himalayan Glaciers.

]]> By: rjjrdq http://rjjrdq.com/2010/02/06/ipcc-fraud-too-much-for-india/comment-page-1/#comment-12670 rjjrdq Tue, 09 Feb 2010 00:42:00 +0000 http://rjjrdq.com/?p=2586#comment-12670 They lost a country 1 billion strong. That is very good news. They lost a country 1 billion strong. That is very good news.

]]> By: Mr Pink Eyes http://rjjrdq.com/2010/02/06/ipcc-fraud-too-much-for-india/comment-page-1/#comment-12563 Mr Pink Eyes Mon, 08 Feb 2010 11:00:41 +0000 http://rjjrdq.com/?p=2586#comment-12563 Hopefully more countries (including the US) will follow India's lead. And Mojo is right; Obama is the most corrupt, deceiptful, AND naive president. Hopefully more countries (including the US) will follow India’s lead. And Mojo is right; Obama is the most corrupt, deceiptful, AND naive president.

]]> By: admin http://rjjrdq.com/2010/02/06/ipcc-fraud-too-much-for-india/comment-page-1/#comment-12317 admin Sun, 07 Feb 2010 06:21:09 +0000 http://rjjrdq.com/?p=2586#comment-12317 Yes, Mojo, that fraud won the Nobel Prize. Remember when that honor used to mean something? Yes, Mojo, that fraud won the Nobel Prize. Remember when that honor used to mean something?

]]> By: Mojo http://rjjrdq.com/2010/02/06/ipcc-fraud-too-much-for-india/comment-page-1/#comment-12312 Mojo Sun, 07 Feb 2010 05:58:31 +0000 http://rjjrdq.com/?p=2586#comment-12312 You leave out the possibility of him being the most naive buffoon and the most corrupt and the most deceitful president ever. Don’t sell him short. He won the Nobel Prize. He can be both ---yes he can!!!! You leave out the possibility of him being the most naive buffoon and the most corrupt and the most deceitful president ever. Don’t sell him short. He won the Nobel Prize. He can be both —yes he can!!!!

]]>