A study conducted at Brock University in Ontario came up with the findings. The study was led by Gordon Hodson, a hack psychologist who more than likely cememted his tenure at the university. Following an unnamed number of children in England over a period of years, he has come to the conclusion that conservative equals prejudice, and a low I.Q. is the facilitator.

Low-intelligence adults tend to gravitate toward socially conservative ideologies, the study found. Those ideologies, in turn, stress hierarchy and resistance to change, attitudes that can contribute to prejudice, Hodson wrote in an email to LiveScience.

The study comes to the conclusion that not only are conservatives stupid and racist, but even dealing with a subject such as racism was just too challenging for the small minds of conservatives.

“This finding is consistent with recent research demonstrating that intergroup contact is mentally challenging and cognitively draining, and consistent with findings that contact reduces prejudice,” said Hodson, who along with his colleagues published these results online Jan. 5 in the journal Psychological Science.

You saw that right. You, my friend, are just too mentally challenged to deal with an issue like race. Not the Al Sharptons, or the Louis Farrakhans, or even Barack Obama and his buddy Jeremiah Wright. No, not them, but conservatives-who they singled out specifically, are just too stupid to deal with the issue on the intellectual level of the aformentioned race baiters.

I’ve documented on this blog many times the blatant and overt racism directed against whites. The only people that would actually buy the snake oil being sold with this study are the very people that they claim are not stupid and prejudiced. In the old days, the way to shut up whites and practice reverse discrimination unopposed is to accuse whites of racism. It didn’t have to be true, but the energy and time consumed fighting the accusation effectively ended any real conversation about race. That’s how you shut up a stupid hillbilly.

Basically, these clowns are blaming conservatives for the failure of the melting pot experiment. It’s a little late to change it now in the United States, and we’ll just have to deal with the various tribes jockeying for positions of power. No longer are we a nation under God, but a nation of disconnected special interests, each separate in their ideology and desires of what America should be. Of course, the conclusion I just drew is just the kind of attitude this study uses as proof that conservatives are dumb racists. There’s only one problem though: I’m right. In the most welcoming country on the face of the earth, all I ask is the expectation that those who come here embrace the ideas and culture of America. After all, we didn’t become number one embracing failed cultures around the world did we? There I go with my hillbilly diatribe again.

Is it rhetoric, or are these kinds of folks so blinded by their ideology that they can’t see that what is in some cases, the obvious. Take immigration that was mentioned in the linked article. Do they not see the damage being done, not only to America, but to the host countries losing their working class population? They do not see that. Do they not see that sharia law is incompatible with American values? They do not. I could go on and on. These clowns came to a conclusion based on cloudy data that they mined for themselves. Me…I can back up my argument, and if these researchers would like to debate it with me, then this stupid conservative will be happy to oblige.

On his way to Washington to speak at a sizable right to life rally, Tennessee Senator Rand Paul was detained at the Nashville airport after setting off one of the alarms. Rand had no weapons on him and offered to pass through again. The TSA denied him, instead demanding a pat down. Keep in mind, this is not just a guy off the street, it was Rand Paul and he was in his own back yard. When Rand refused to be groped by the Einsteins from the TSA, he was detained and missed his flight. Ultimately, he was allowed to pass through the scanners again and given the A-Ok.

In a country where trusted travelers from Mexico can pass through airports with no screening at all, a well known politician is detained ostensibly for the safety of others in the airport. You know, it might be nice if Rand’s dad brought this up at the next debate. No one has yet, the obvious insecurity at our airports, and our seaports, and the wide open border, and Fast and Furious, and Matricula Consular, and everything else that the candidates have not touched. Not one of them. If I were running for president, I would have brought up these issues at the start, but in the case of Ron Paul, better late than never. His boy was man-handled by the TSA. He will have a national stage to stoke some outrage over what the TSA engages in.

Nice going, not giving in Rand. Hopefully your martyrdom at the hands of the TSA will put this issue back in the headlines.

I’ve talked before about the Raza Studies program in Tucson Schools. A racist agenda that blames whitey for all the ills suffered by Latinos. The text books spew language so vile and incendiary, that an administrative law judge has put an end to it.

Judge Lewis Kowal ruled that the program violates state law, for a variety of reasons.

Kowal’s ruling, first reported by The Arizona Daily Star, said the district’s Mexican-American Studies program violated state law by having one or more classes designed primarily for one ethnic group, promoting racial resentment and advocating ethnic solidarity instead of treating students as individuals.

The language that the judge used was pretty tame, but the language he was referring to is anything but.

One of the textbooks they use is titled “Occupied America,” which was written by Rodolfo Acuña and includes a speech given by activist and university professor Jose Angel Gutierrez in which he says: “We have got to eliminate the gringo, and what I mean by that is if the worst comes to the worst, we have got to kill him,” (pg. 323).

The program, the teachers, and the text books are full of this kind of hatred, so much so that a judge ruled it illegal, and will result in the Tucson School district having a significant amount of funding withheld if they don’t comply with the law.

A victory for America, and a victory against racist hate speech. At the same time, This is one school district, in one city in one state. We know this kind of thing is happening all over the Southwest, the area of the country known as Aztlan by the racist reconquistas that actively advocate that takeover of America-and the purging of non-Mestizos, even resorting to killing whitey if necessary. I didn’t say it, check page 323.

I bring up the subject of illegal immigration often. Not only do illegal aliens have no right to be here, but their offspring become automatic citizens and attend school on the taxpayer dime to learn the kind of garbage found in Raza Studies. This is going on right now, today. I’ve said before, that these people have a single-minded purpose, and they won’t stop ever. I talked about demographics and the electoral votes that are in peril in the border states. Republicans-America as a people cannot afford to lose those states. If we do, then we lose the rest of the country, because we’ll just be voted into the third world. In our case, the racist, intolerant third world. Their message is clear; they have a curriculum.

As the presidential campaign heads into 2012, this issue needs to be addressed more. And the next time you hear Rick Perry defending the schooling of illegal aliens in his state, just keep in mind Raza Studies.

This looks like-and probably is, an attack from the left. Unfortunately for Ron Paul, the allegations happen to be true. Back in the late 80′s and early 90′s several newsletters were published using Ron Paul’s name. The newsletters were laced with racist quotes, and apparently, this went on for years. When confronted with the content in 1996, Paul took responsibility, but handled it like Herman Cain.

In 1996 when the Texas Monthly investigated the newsletters, Paul took responsibility for them and said that certain things were taken out of context.

Well, maybe, but check the link and tell me if there is a way to take those statements out of context.

Even worse for Paul is that he profited handsomely from these newsletters, even netting one million dollars in a single year. This at the same time racist statements were sopping up the pages of the newsletters. Sure, Ron Paul, like many successful Americans may have many business opportunities going at the same time. This was a money maker though. Did he never glance at those pages? Was there noone in his inner circle to pull him aside and tell him about this? I’ll give Paul the benefit of the doubt that he didn’t know about the content and didn’t contribute, but this was so close to him he should have known.

What this does to Paul remains to be seen. It looks like flavor of the week Gingrich is fading, and Ron Paul is looking at a possible win in Iowa. Well, maybe not with these allegations. Ron Paul already has a reputation-valid or not-of being clueless. Now he is using that very liability as a defense in this case. Not a good thing, especially in the eyes of those that are on the fence. If Ron Paul was unaware-for years of something that was lining his pockets substantially, then how aware would he be as a president? Either way, whether he knew about the content of these newsletters or not he comes out looking bad.

I said earlier that this was probably an attack from the left. Of course, it couldn’t come at a worse time. Assuming he’s not responsible for the content of those newsletters-and without further evidence I assume he is not, he doesn’t have much time to recover from the controversy. This is Paul’s Jeremiah Wright moment. Barack Obama is on the left, and the media gave him a pass. 20 years in that church pew and he never heard a word. Ron Paul doesn’t have that luxury. For Paul, he’s either racist or he’s clueless. Neither choice bodes well for a presidential candidate.

The California Opportunity and Prosperity Act, the brainchild of reconquista assemblyman Felipe Fuentes is a measure that would all but legalize illegal aliens. 504,760 signatures are needed to put the measure before voters, and if the Russell Pearce recall in Arizona is any indicator, they should have no problem getting them. Si se puede.

Fuentes uses a familiar argument in defense of breaking the law.

“I hope this shows Washington, D.C., that if they fail to act, California will take the lead on this critical issue,” Fuentes said in a written statement.

Wait a minute. Isn’t that the exact same argument used by Arizona, Georgia, Alabama, South Carolina and Utah? That the feds aren’t doing their job and they had to take matters into their own hands?

The one thing that Fuentes and I can agree on is that that the federal government is not doing its job in addressing the problem. Where we diverge is on what exactly the feds need to be doing. The feds need to enforcing existing law, and at the same time they can address whatever bottlenecks exist in regards to immigration policy. Fuentes wants just the opposite. In lieu of federal amnesty, he wants to create state wide amnesty.

Since federal law makes it illegal to hire an undocumented immigrant, the program calls for the state to seek exceptions from the federal government that would provide a “safe harbor” for participants or people who hire them.

…And those that hire them. In other words, businesses can hire illegals at will with no threat of prosecution from the state. The question is, what would the feds do with such a law? What would Eric Holder do in the face of such defiance? He’s attacked other states that have attempted to pass immigration laws with everything the Justice Department could throw at them. Then again, Holder has done nothing regarding Utah’s guest worker law, the sanctuary cities across the United States, and the massive voter fraud the occurs courtesy of illegal aliens every election. We know what he’ll do: Nothing.

Even without an amnesty, we’re losing the country. Felipe Fuentes will tell you. So will Luis Gutierrez and the rest of the Hispanic caucus in Washington. Newt Gingrich understands this and is pandering to the reconquistas in a bid to stuff his fat ass into the White House. Michelle Bachmann understands, but is taking a different approach. She wants incremental deportation, destroying the argument that you can’t deport them all. Well, under Bachmann’s plan, you can. Xavier Becerra, the reconquista congressman from-California of course, is attacking Mitt Romney, labeling him as anti-immigrant latino, and a dangerous man in the White House. That’s a good sign for Mitt. If they hate you, you’re saying the right things.

Assuming Obama is deposed next year, the Justice Department position will be critically important, as well as the Homeland Security position. Weeding out the traitors and going after states like California will keep any legitimate Justice Department busy for years. In the meantime, America will have to just sit and take this clear flouting of the law, while the Obama regime continues to attack those on the side of law and order.

A man in Texas ran an ad on the radio offering classes that would help an individual obtain a conealed gun permit. Maybe not the kind of ad you hear on the radio every day, but in the Lone Star state, you can carry a concealed weapon, and this guy, Crockett Keller, wants to show people how to do it right. The problem for him is, he doesn’t want to show everybody how to do it, and as a result, the state of Texas has launched an investigation.

Keller’s ad specifically singles out Obama voters and Muslims as the types of people that are not welcome in his class as the ad makes clear.

“We will attempt to teach you all the necessary information you need to obtain your [Concealed Handgun License],” the ad says. Then towards the end, it adds: “If you are a socialist liberal and/or voted for the current campaigner in chief, please do not take this class. You have already proven that you cannot make a knowledgeable and prudent decision under the law.”

And then: “If you are a non-Christian Arab or Muslim, I will not teach you the class with no shame; I am Crockett Keller, thank you, and God bless America.”

Apparently, discriminating on the basis of religion may be violating a federal statute. Ahh, the Muslims. No doubt CAIR got wind of this, and their dhimmis in government circles will be all over Keller. Regardless, Keller says he won’t budge. In fact, he’s willing to give up his license to teach the class if those are the consequences. Here we have Keller in hot water, not for denying the Obamabots, but for denying the Muslims. To pretend that the war on terror is not v.s. Islam is naivete on a suicidal scale, or conspiracy to aid and abet the enemy.

It’s not clear whether Keller violated state of federal laws, but in any case, my opinion is that he should be free to deal with whoever he wants, especially with something as serious as a concealed gun permit. Extreme? Probably. But I go back to what I said at the beginning of this piece. The times we live in call for extreme actions. Under normal circumstances Keller might be considered out of line, but these aren’t normal circumstances. I haven’t forgotten 9-11, Ft. Hood, or any of the thousands of terror attacks since. And what is the common denominator in those attacks. Yes, Islam. Save for one Norwegian nutcase, the rest have been Islam fueled attacks, and Keller doesn’t want to contribute to it. It looks like the state or the STATE may force the issue though. I’m with you Crockett, in this day, in this age, yeah, you got it right.

Jerry Brown is a socialist, make no mistake about that. I think that he really believes what he is doing is for the good of all. It’s fair-it’s social justice. Unfortunately, like most leftists, what is right is not open for debate. That’s the way it is, and that’s the way it will be. The result has been a collapse of what was once the country’s most prosperous state. But Brown isn’t a socialist just for the sake of being one. He will veto a bill that he doesn’t think fits into what he sees as a drive to a socialist nirvana. The good news is, that of all the crackpots running the state, Brown isn’t the worst of them. The bad news is that he has to deal with the crackpots who are the worst.

Brown had a slew of bills on his desk this week, one of them the legal racism bill I talked about a while back. The bill would have allowed California colleges to consider race when admitting students. Stunningly, Brown vetoed the bill, even though he agreed with the concept. He just didn’t think it was done the right way. The voter passed Proposition 209 several years ago, prohibiting the state from giving race-based preferences to anybody. This bill would have trampled the will of the people, and to Brown’s credit, he wouldn’t bite.

But, he wrote, “Our constitutional system of separation of powers requires that the courts — not the Legislature — determine the limits of Proposition 209.”

Make no mistake, Brown would like the courts to overturn Prop 209, but he won’t let the legislature do it. My guess is the ethno-loons that troll the state will get their wish soon enough, but they’ll have to get it another way. As attorney general Brown actually did argue in court that universities should be able to consider race. As governor, he chose not to be a hyprocrite and vetoed the bill.

That was one of several bills on the socialist ethno-centric, autocratic, authoritarian social justice agenda. Brown also signed a law banning minors from using tanning beds. All of California’s woes, and some joker is worrying about tanning beds. Then there was the dense tissue bill. That would have required extra warnings for women with firm breasts. You can’t make this up. If a woman has dense, firm breasts, some clown came to the conclusion that those were prime conditions for breast cancer. There is no evidence that this is true, and Brown rightly vetoed that bill. He also vetoed a bill that would have made it a crime to circumcise infants. You are correct, that came straight out of San Francisco. A court struck it down there, and Brown stuck it down in San Francisco. You can’t make this up. Then there was yet another ethno-interest bill that would have unionized baby sitters-child care providers that is. You know who that is right? Si se puede. Brown struck that down as well.

In all, Brown has had nearly 600 bills thrown at him. You saw that right. I just highlighed some of the more recent ones, and you can be sure that the hundreds of other bills were just as ridiculous. There’s absolutely no way to keep up with the rules, laws, edicts, and regulations that the state of California has imposed on its citizens. What Brown should have done from the start is to veto everything and admonish the legislature to only submit important bills. The ones I outlined here are only a priority for some special interest group, the same crowd that are pouring gasoline on the socialist fires of California.

We win some, we lose some with Brown. Unfortunately, we lose much more often, because in the end, he is a socialist, and his ideology runs very closely with the ideas of a Barack Obama, or even a Van Jones. Brown just isn’t as cutthroat about it, although he will look for other avenues to achieve the same goals.

Just another week in the late, great state of California.

It certainly seems to me to be a concerted effort. RINO John McCain bashed the tea party during the debt ceiling debate. By the way, we’re out of money again. What happened to that bipartisan agreement? Another post. Then we had reconquista hate monger Antonio Villaraigosa do his teleprompter rant against the tea party. Maxine Waters didn’t need a teleprompter. She just told them to go to hell. Andre Carson thinks he’s going to be swinging from a tree-courtesy the tea party whitey. Joe Biden had his terrorist, and gun to our heads statements to describe the movement. Al Sharpton…never mind.

Now we have out of the blue a rant by Morgan Freeman, a veteran Hollywood star, and apparently, a black man. In case you didn’t know that, he made it very clear that he was, and so was Obama.

So what you ask? On an episode of Piers Morgan on CNN, Morgan ranted that the tea party was motivated by race-apparently exclusively.

“Their stated policy, publicly stated, is to do whatever it takes to see to it that Obama only serves one term,” Freeman noted. “What underlines that? ‘Screw the country. We’re going to whatever we can to get this black man outta here.’”

Dismissing Morgan’s suggestion that the Tea Party’s motivations might be merely political, Freeman asserted, “It is a racist thing.”

Where do I begin? First of all, who is they? “Their stated policy?” Morgan wasn’t clear, no surprise considering the premise of his argument. Sure Morgan, whatever it takes to get rid of a shitty president. I said nearly the same thing about Bush. Had I been blogging for Bush’s two terms you would have heard much more. The fact that Obama is even worse than Bush doesn’t escape me though. He doesn’t get a pass because he’s black. The presidency is not an affirmative action job. Well, it wasn’t anyway.

Then Freeman just couldn’t resist throwing down the race card. My next question would be, how is it racist? What statements or actions of any kind from any body even suggests the notion that race is a factor in Obama’s disastrous presidency? Herman Cain wants to know. Alan West might want to know should he throw his hat in the ring. Alan Keyes certainly would be interested. Tell us Morgan, where does race factor in?

Piers let him off the hook as expected. Of course. He’s Morgan Freeman. Certainly no white actor would have gotten off so easily had they done the Jeremiah Wright thing on the show. But Freeman’s not white.

I understand that Morgan Freeman is old enough to have seen and experienced things I don’t even want to think about. I understand he’s probably harboring some anger at the white race, and frankly I probably would too. I could say the same about the Sharpton’s and the Jackson’s and all the rest of them. This is a new day though. Those things are not occurring now. There are no water cannons or vicious attack dogs tearing apart anybody lobbying for civil rights. Those days are over.

Morgan Freeman can still feel the way he does without painting a broad brush of racism across a huge swath of the population. I think Freeman is intelligent enough to know the folly of that thinking. He may be blinded by the past though. At his age, that isn’t likely to change. But to get on the air and try to stir the race pot is looking to start trouble based on a false premise. There are those in the tea party movement that voted for Obama in 2008. He sucks, and now they want him out. Freeman basically acknowledged that when he said that the better the economy is the better Obama’s poll numbers are.

You can’t have it both ways Freeman. When the economy is humming, does that mean racism magically goes away? Or does the tea party just shelve it for when things get bad? Morgan Freeman knows better. Morgan, I’m sorry your multi-million dollar, Oscar winning life hasn’t turned out the way you like. Plenty of tea partiers that would be very happy to end up where you are in life. Morgan, you should have kept your mouth shut and continued to do what you do best. I won’t be able to watch one of your movies now without thinking of this rant. I won’t boycott, but at the same time, you’ve lost the respect of someone who did consider you one of the class acts in Hollywood. Didn’t know this side. Didn’t want to know it.

For a first lady to show disrespect for America is bad enough in and of itself, but to do in the context of a 9-11 ceremony is beyond reproach. Michelle Obama has appeared to do just that.

The internet was buzzing this week with video of First Lady Michelle Obama apparently showing extreme disrespect to the American flag at a ceremony in honor of the victims of the September 11, 2001 terror attacks. As police and firefighters fold the flag to the sound of marching bagpipers, a skeptical looking Mrs. Obama leans to her husband and appears to say, “all this just for a flag.” She then purses her lips and shakes her head slightly as Mr. Obama nods.

Here’s the video, judge for yourself. Clearly, she makes a reference to “flag,” but the rest I suppose is open to interpretation. Well, it would be if it were anyone else. Given Michelle’s history, it sure looks like she’s denigrating the flag-and those who perished on 9-11. Does Barry need anything else to drive his poll numbers down?