Normally I don’t like to delve into single issues such as the Trevon Martin shooting case, because politically, it diverts from larger issues facing the country. Don’t get me wrong; for the Martin family this is as big as an issue gets, and for this particular case, it has become one of those larger issues facing the country.

Everybody knows the story now-or at least some of it. Neighborhood Watch guy George Zimmerman had a confrontation with 17-year-old Trevon Martin which resulted in Martin being shot to death. When Zimmerman was not arrested-or even charged with a crime, the story took on a life of its own and went national. That’s when one of the larger issues facing the country reared its ugly head. The racists came out of their caves are are using this issue to foment racial hatred, the only game they know.

The media has even joined in the charade. First, this Zimmerman character was presented as a white guy that gunned down an innocent black youth. C’mon, you’ve seen his picture. If Zimmerman is white then so is Barack Obama. Zimmerman is half Latino, and once that had been established, the talk about whitey died down. Of course, there is no talk at all about any repercussions against Latinos in general. Not with another amnesty push in the wings. Even Barry has jumped in the discussion, saying that if he had a son he would look like Trevon Martin. And the flames get a little higher.

You have Frederica Wilson (D-Florida) blathering that Martin was hunted down like a dog, shot in the street, etc. etc. Of course, an eyewitness account had the hunted one bouncing Zimmerman’s head off the pavement in a scuffle, but all that shows is that we do not yet have the whole story. Not necessary for professional race baiters Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson. They made their bones race baiting (Tawana Brawley will tell you), and they headed down to Florida to raise their own profile. We know that they could care less about the fate of Trevon Martin. We go back to the stunningly ignored black on black crime in this country. Well, these race baiters must love the violence, because Spike Lee Tweeted the address of the Zimmerman family. Or at least he thought he did. It turned out to be incorrect, and as a result, and elderly couple bore the brunt of Lee’s wayward tweet. Somebody better get the word out to the occupy Sanford crowd before this poor couple gets hurt. Then again, if we take the Black Panthers approach, getting hurt is what it’s all about. They’ve offered a bounty for the capture of George Zimmerman. Hmmm. What would they do after capturing him. So far, no word from Eric the coward on that. Of course, Holder thinks baton weilding thugs at polling places isn’t a crime, so what can we expect from him? We can expect him to investigate the Sanford Police Department. Not the Panthers, the cops.

You get the picture. A young black man dies every day in this country and none of these people give a damn. In fact, this administration defends the very type of thugs that promote violence in the very communities where a young black man is likely to meet his demise. But violence against blacks isn’t the issue with these people. Racial strife is their bread and butter. It’s an appeal to a base that is constantly indoctrinated with the myth that the man is out to get them, and they need a Sharpton or a Jackson or a Jeremiah Wright to fight for them.

From Barry, to Eric the coward on down, if these are leaders in the black community, then what chance does the black community have? What will be the end result? Well, we see some of it right now. Not many things are technically insurmountable, but if the Black Panthers are the voice of reason in your community, we will see more concocted racial strife in the future, while the real racists bask in the glow of the ensuing chaos.

The big headline concocted by the media at the moment is Rick Santorum and his satan comments. Look it up. It was in the context of an entire speech, but the agnostic media has turned it into a campaign issue, devastingly so for the Republican party. Santorum is being portrayed as a religious kook. Keep in mind, the views he is now sharing are the same ones he’s held for years. When Santorum was a senator, did he ever do anything crazy? Did he act like a kook, like an irrational religious nut that tried to impose his thinking on everybody? No, he didn’t. Sure, in most cases, he came up with bills and voted according to his value set, but I never heard of him doing anything so nutty that he should be removed from office. Yet that is the perception the media would like us to have about Rick Santorum. So for those that think Santorum is too extreme, that have turned away from him in recent weeks, keep in mind, he was like this before. How did you feel then?

Then we have the Jeremy Lin debacle. A great story, Lin comes off the bench for the New York Knicks and becomes a star overnight. He’s as American as apple pie, but there are those-the media, that want to portray him as Chinese-American. He is not. He is American, although his lineage goes back to China. We all heard what happened. ESPN printed a headline that was perceived as an ethnic slur. A broadcaster later used it in an interview-not with Lin, but on the air. It was a term commonly used in sports: A chink in the armor. Yes, that word has derogatory connotations for those of Chinese dissent, but at the same time, is there anyone that really thinks those guys at ESPN purposely ran that headline to mock Lin? The professional whiners would like you to think so. Was it inappropriate? Probably not the best line considering the history of the word in this country. At the same time, anyone who thinks that it was an intentional slur against Lin is just lying. Do you think those guys wanted to lose their jobs? Do you think they want all this flak heaped upon them? The broadcaster who uttered the phrase has a wife of Chinese descent! Sounds to me like these guys had moved on and didn’t even see this as a slur. Obviously, there are those the haven’t moved on.

In Los Angeles, there is a very popular radio duo known as John and Ken. With their railing against illegal immigration (in Los Angeles), and their annual head on a stick effort to remove unpalatable politicians from office, they’ve made many an enemy, and last week those enemies scored at least a temporary victory. Commenting on the death of Whitney Houston, one of them chimed that Houston was just a crack ho’. That got them suspended for a week. Does anybody actually think Whitney Houston was out in the alley selling her body for a hit of crack? No, nobody thinks that. Was she a drug addict? Yes she was. Did those drugs include crack? At least for some portion of her addiction, yes. Was it in bad taste? Probably, but if that was the criteria for suspension, John and Ken would have been off the air years ago. Instead, they’re one of the highest rated shows in the state.

What happened to John and Ken can be likened to what happened to Howard Stern. Somebody didn’t like the content and looked to stifle it. When Stern’s show became too expensive for radio stations to handle, he ended up on Sirius.

But not all are attacked for speaking their mind. The expletive filled racist rant from Samuel L. Jackson didn’t even make a ripple in the media. Nor did Morgan Freeman’s accusations of racism against the tea party. Maxine Waters’ legendary hate speech isn’t news either. Jeremiah wright had faded into obscurity, even as his prodigy occupies the White House. Obama gets away with his God, guns and anti-immigrant sentiment comment with a wink and a nod. We could actually compile a list with him and his buddy Eric Holder. Van Jones had to be dragged kicking and screaming from the White House after his wild assertions. He’s still around though, yes he is.

I could write a book about this subject, but for now, this post will have to suffice. Just keep this in mind though. As the left dictates the discussion for Republicans that will guarantee a loss in November, none of the candidates are defending freedom of speech. Politically correct means anything that comes out of your mouth must be pre-approved by the powers that be, whoever they may be at the moment. And we know who they are at the moment. Are you okay with that? If you have a thought, do you want to run it by Al Sharpton first? Or do you want to be free to speak your mind without having to worry if your career-or maybe even your safety may be at risk?

I can say how I feel here, but as I said earlier, I cannot talk like this at work and expect to keep my job. As it is, diversity and inclusion means less white males, so I’m lucky I’m drawing a paycheck at all. It shouldn’t be like that, and it’s going to take someone-or something with a wider reach than my blog to at least start a dialogue about it. I still have a standing offer to debate Eric Holder on the issue of cowardice when discussing race though. He hasn’t contacted me yet…

A study conducted at Brock University in Ontario came up with the findings. The study was led by Gordon Hodson, a hack psychologist who more than likely cememted his tenure at the university. Following an unnamed number of children in England over a period of years, he has come to the conclusion that conservative equals prejudice, and a low I.Q. is the facilitator.

Low-intelligence adults tend to gravitate toward socially conservative ideologies, the study found. Those ideologies, in turn, stress hierarchy and resistance to change, attitudes that can contribute to prejudice, Hodson wrote in an email to LiveScience.

The study comes to the conclusion that not only are conservatives stupid and racist, but even dealing with a subject such as racism was just too challenging for the small minds of conservatives.

“This finding is consistent with recent research demonstrating that intergroup contact is mentally challenging and cognitively draining, and consistent with findings that contact reduces prejudice,” said Hodson, who along with his colleagues published these results online Jan. 5 in the journal Psychological Science.

You saw that right. You, my friend, are just too mentally challenged to deal with an issue like race. Not the Al Sharptons, or the Louis Farrakhans, or even Barack Obama and his buddy Jeremiah Wright. No, not them, but conservatives-who they singled out specifically, are just too stupid to deal with the issue on the intellectual level of the aformentioned race baiters.

I’ve documented on this blog many times the blatant and overt racism directed against whites. The only people that would actually buy the snake oil being sold with this study are the very people that they claim are not stupid and prejudiced. In the old days, the way to shut up whites and practice reverse discrimination unopposed is to accuse whites of racism. It didn’t have to be true, but the energy and time consumed fighting the accusation effectively ended any real conversation about race. That’s how you shut up a stupid hillbilly.

Basically, these clowns are blaming conservatives for the failure of the melting pot experiment. It’s a little late to change it now in the United States, and we’ll just have to deal with the various tribes jockeying for positions of power. No longer are we a nation under God, but a nation of disconnected special interests, each separate in their ideology and desires of what America should be. Of course, the conclusion I just drew is just the kind of attitude this study uses as proof that conservatives are dumb racists. There’s only one problem though: I’m right. In the most welcoming country on the face of the earth, all I ask is the expectation that those who come here embrace the ideas and culture of America. After all, we didn’t become number one embracing failed cultures around the world did we? There I go with my hillbilly diatribe again.

Is it rhetoric, or are these kinds of folks so blinded by their ideology that they can’t see that what is in some cases, the obvious. Take immigration that was mentioned in the linked article. Do they not see the damage being done, not only to America, but to the host countries losing their working class population? They do not see that. Do they not see that sharia law is incompatible with American values? They do not. I could go on and on. These clowns came to a conclusion based on cloudy data that they mined for themselves. Me…I can back up my argument, and if these researchers would like to debate it with me, then this stupid conservative will be happy to oblige.

On his way to Washington to speak at a sizable right to life rally, Tennessee Senator Rand Paul was detained at the Nashville airport after setting off one of the alarms. Rand had no weapons on him and offered to pass through again. The TSA denied him, instead demanding a pat down. Keep in mind, this is not just a guy off the street, it was Rand Paul and he was in his own back yard. When Rand refused to be groped by the Einsteins from the TSA, he was detained and missed his flight. Ultimately, he was allowed to pass through the scanners again and given the A-Ok.

In a country where trusted travelers from Mexico can pass through airports with no screening at all, a well known politician is detained ostensibly for the safety of others in the airport. You know, it might be nice if Rand’s dad brought this up at the next debate. No one has yet, the obvious insecurity at our airports, and our seaports, and the wide open border, and Fast and Furious, and Matricula Consular, and everything else that the candidates have not touched. Not one of them. If I were running for president, I would have brought up these issues at the start, but in the case of Ron Paul, better late than never. His boy was man-handled by the TSA. He will have a national stage to stoke some outrage over what the TSA engages in.

Nice going, not giving in Rand. Hopefully your martyrdom at the hands of the TSA will put this issue back in the headlines.

I’ve talked before about the Raza Studies program in Tucson Schools. A racist agenda that blames whitey for all the ills suffered by Latinos. The text books spew language so vile and incendiary, that an administrative law judge has put an end to it.

Judge Lewis Kowal ruled that the program violates state law, for a variety of reasons.

Kowal’s ruling, first reported by The Arizona Daily Star, said the district’s Mexican-American Studies program violated state law by having one or more classes designed primarily for one ethnic group, promoting racial resentment and advocating ethnic solidarity instead of treating students as individuals.

The language that the judge used was pretty tame, but the language he was referring to is anything but.

One of the textbooks they use is titled “Occupied America,” which was written by Rodolfo Acuña and includes a speech given by activist and university professor Jose Angel Gutierrez in which he says: “We have got to eliminate the gringo, and what I mean by that is if the worst comes to the worst, we have got to kill him,” (pg. 323).

The program, the teachers, and the text books are full of this kind of hatred, so much so that a judge ruled it illegal, and will result in the Tucson School district having a significant amount of funding withheld if they don’t comply with the law.

A victory for America, and a victory against racist hate speech. At the same time, This is one school district, in one city in one state. We know this kind of thing is happening all over the Southwest, the area of the country known as Aztlan by the racist reconquistas that actively advocate that takeover of America-and the purging of non-Mestizos, even resorting to killing whitey if necessary. I didn’t say it, check page 323.

I bring up the subject of illegal immigration often. Not only do illegal aliens have no right to be here, but their offspring become automatic citizens and attend school on the taxpayer dime to learn the kind of garbage found in Raza Studies. This is going on right now, today. I’ve said before, that these people have a single-minded purpose, and they won’t stop ever. I talked about demographics and the electoral votes that are in peril in the border states. Republicans-America as a people cannot afford to lose those states. If we do, then we lose the rest of the country, because we’ll just be voted into the third world. In our case, the racist, intolerant third world. Their message is clear; they have a curriculum.

As the presidential campaign heads into 2012, this issue needs to be addressed more. And the next time you hear Rick Perry defending the schooling of illegal aliens in his state, just keep in mind Raza Studies.

This looks like-and probably is, an attack from the left. Unfortunately for Ron Paul, the allegations happen to be true. Back in the late 80′s and early 90′s several newsletters were published using Ron Paul’s name. The newsletters were laced with racist quotes, and apparently, this went on for years. When confronted with the content in 1996, Paul took responsibility, but handled it like Herman Cain.

In 1996 when the Texas Monthly investigated the newsletters, Paul took responsibility for them and said that certain things were taken out of context.

Well, maybe, but check the link and tell me if there is a way to take those statements out of context.

Even worse for Paul is that he profited handsomely from these newsletters, even netting one million dollars in a single year. This at the same time racist statements were sopping up the pages of the newsletters. Sure, Ron Paul, like many successful Americans may have many business opportunities going at the same time. This was a money maker though. Did he never glance at those pages? Was there noone in his inner circle to pull him aside and tell him about this? I’ll give Paul the benefit of the doubt that he didn’t know about the content and didn’t contribute, but this was so close to him he should have known.

What this does to Paul remains to be seen. It looks like flavor of the week Gingrich is fading, and Ron Paul is looking at a possible win in Iowa. Well, maybe not with these allegations. Ron Paul already has a reputation-valid or not-of being clueless. Now he is using that very liability as a defense in this case. Not a good thing, especially in the eyes of those that are on the fence. If Ron Paul was unaware-for years of something that was lining his pockets substantially, then how aware would he be as a president? Either way, whether he knew about the content of these newsletters or not he comes out looking bad.

I said earlier that this was probably an attack from the left. Of course, it couldn’t come at a worse time. Assuming he’s not responsible for the content of those newsletters-and without further evidence I assume he is not, he doesn’t have much time to recover from the controversy. This is Paul’s Jeremiah Wright moment. Barack Obama is on the left, and the media gave him a pass. 20 years in that church pew and he never heard a word. Ron Paul doesn’t have that luxury. For Paul, he’s either racist or he’s clueless. Neither choice bodes well for a presidential candidate.

The California Opportunity and Prosperity Act, the brainchild of reconquista assemblyman Felipe Fuentes is a measure that would all but legalize illegal aliens. 504,760 signatures are needed to put the measure before voters, and if the Russell Pearce recall in Arizona is any indicator, they should have no problem getting them. Si se puede.

Fuentes uses a familiar argument in defense of breaking the law.

“I hope this shows Washington, D.C., that if they fail to act, California will take the lead on this critical issue,” Fuentes said in a written statement.

Wait a minute. Isn’t that the exact same argument used by Arizona, Georgia, Alabama, South Carolina and Utah? That the feds aren’t doing their job and they had to take matters into their own hands?

The one thing that Fuentes and I can agree on is that that the federal government is not doing its job in addressing the problem. Where we diverge is on what exactly the feds need to be doing. The feds need to enforcing existing law, and at the same time they can address whatever bottlenecks exist in regards to immigration policy. Fuentes wants just the opposite. In lieu of federal amnesty, he wants to create state wide amnesty.

Since federal law makes it illegal to hire an undocumented immigrant, the program calls for the state to seek exceptions from the federal government that would provide a “safe harbor” for participants or people who hire them.

…And those that hire them. In other words, businesses can hire illegals at will with no threat of prosecution from the state. The question is, what would the feds do with such a law? What would Eric Holder do in the face of such defiance? He’s attacked other states that have attempted to pass immigration laws with everything the Justice Department could throw at them. Then again, Holder has done nothing regarding Utah’s guest worker law, the sanctuary cities across the United States, and the massive voter fraud the occurs courtesy of illegal aliens every election. We know what he’ll do: Nothing.

Even without an amnesty, we’re losing the country. Felipe Fuentes will tell you. So will Luis Gutierrez and the rest of the Hispanic caucus in Washington. Newt Gingrich understands this and is pandering to the reconquistas in a bid to stuff his fat ass into the White House. Michelle Bachmann understands, but is taking a different approach. She wants incremental deportation, destroying the argument that you can’t deport them all. Well, under Bachmann’s plan, you can. Xavier Becerra, the reconquista congressman from-California of course, is attacking Mitt Romney, labeling him as anti-immigrant latino, and a dangerous man in the White House. That’s a good sign for Mitt. If they hate you, you’re saying the right things.

Assuming Obama is deposed next year, the Justice Department position will be critically important, as well as the Homeland Security position. Weeding out the traitors and going after states like California will keep any legitimate Justice Department busy for years. In the meantime, America will have to just sit and take this clear flouting of the law, while the Obama regime continues to attack those on the side of law and order.

A man in Texas ran an ad on the radio offering classes that would help an individual obtain a conealed gun permit. Maybe not the kind of ad you hear on the radio every day, but in the Lone Star state, you can carry a concealed weapon, and this guy, Crockett Keller, wants to show people how to do it right. The problem for him is, he doesn’t want to show everybody how to do it, and as a result, the state of Texas has launched an investigation.

Keller’s ad specifically singles out Obama voters and Muslims as the types of people that are not welcome in his class as the ad makes clear.

“We will attempt to teach you all the necessary information you need to obtain your [Concealed Handgun License],” the ad says. Then towards the end, it adds: “If you are a socialist liberal and/or voted for the current campaigner in chief, please do not take this class. You have already proven that you cannot make a knowledgeable and prudent decision under the law.”

And then: “If you are a non-Christian Arab or Muslim, I will not teach you the class with no shame; I am Crockett Keller, thank you, and God bless America.”

Apparently, discriminating on the basis of religion may be violating a federal statute. Ahh, the Muslims. No doubt CAIR got wind of this, and their dhimmis in government circles will be all over Keller. Regardless, Keller says he won’t budge. In fact, he’s willing to give up his license to teach the class if those are the consequences. Here we have Keller in hot water, not for denying the Obamabots, but for denying the Muslims. To pretend that the war on terror is not v.s. Islam is naivete on a suicidal scale, or conspiracy to aid and abet the enemy.

It’s not clear whether Keller violated state of federal laws, but in any case, my opinion is that he should be free to deal with whoever he wants, especially with something as serious as a concealed gun permit. Extreme? Probably. But I go back to what I said at the beginning of this piece. The times we live in call for extreme actions. Under normal circumstances Keller might be considered out of line, but these aren’t normal circumstances. I haven’t forgotten 9-11, Ft. Hood, or any of the thousands of terror attacks since. And what is the common denominator in those attacks. Yes, Islam. Save for one Norwegian nutcase, the rest have been Islam fueled attacks, and Keller doesn’t want to contribute to it. It looks like the state or the STATE may force the issue though. I’m with you Crockett, in this day, in this age, yeah, you got it right.