<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>rjjrdq&#039;s America II &#187; New World Order</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rjjrdq.com/category/new-world-order/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rjjrdq.com</link>
	<description>Still good, still bad, and still absurd...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 04:22:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>U.N. Climate Fraudsters Reach Latest Deal</title>
		<link>http://rjjrdq.com/2011/12/11/u-n-climate-fraudsters-reach-latest-deal/</link>
		<comments>http://rjjrdq.com/2011/12/11/u-n-climate-fraudsters-reach-latest-deal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 06:15:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rjjrdq</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Globalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjjrdq.com/?p=4971</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Other than Mr. Waffle Mitt Romney straddling the fence and the carbon nightmare Newt Gingrich rolling around on the couch with Nancy Pelosi, we haven&#8217;t heard the Republican presidential candidate address the issue of climate change with much vigor. However, they are all skeptics now, even if they had to flip-flop to get there. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Other than Mr. Waffle Mitt Romney straddling the fence and the carbon nightmare Newt Gingrich rolling around on the couch with Nancy Pelosi, we haven&#8217;t heard the Republican presidential candidate address the issue of <i>climate change</i> with much vigor. However, they are all <i>skeptics</i> now, even if they had to flip-flop to get there. With  the kind of money the socialists are talking about, it still doesn&#8217;t generate much reaction from the candidates. Strange, considering it is the engine that the global socialists are using to redistribute wealth. Which reminds me, none of the canidates have addressed the United Nations and their actions either. Well, we could make the Newt/Bolton connection, but other than that&#8230;Meanwhile, the climate fraudsters are hard at work, and have come up with their latest wealth redistribution <i>agreement.</i><span id="more-4971"></span></p>
<p>A United Nations <i>climate conference</i> in the AIDS wracked murder capital known as South Africa <a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2011/12/11/MN171MAVV2.DTL" target="_blank">has concluded</a>, and like other climate conferences, the issue centered around money.</p>
<p>This was basically an update to the expiring Kyoto Protocol, something George Bush pulled out of. Any nation that did sign on were <i>legally binded</i> to destroy themselves in an effort to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Of course, China and India weren&#8217;t on board then, and they weren&#8217;t on board this time either. Even they can recognize that this is a scam, but if they can pass themselves off as one of the <i>poor</i> countries designated in the agreement, there may be some money in it for them. It&#8217;s always about the money, and the U.N. always gives that away at some point. They have to if it&#8217;s a <i>legally binding</i> agreement.</p>
<blockquote><p>The deal also set up the bodies that will collect, govern and distribute tens of billions of dollars a year to poor countries to help them adapt to changing climate conditions and to move toward low-carbon economic growth.</p></blockquote>
<p>Remember, this is the same U.N. that wants $45 trillion to fight the <i>scourge</i> of global warming. Apparently, that tens of billions is <i>annually.</i></p>
<p>Folks, it is the United States that is funding its own demise. We can turn the spigot off to the United Nations, although we won&#8217;t get any help from the Muslim in chief in the White House. The Republicans do hold the purse strings in congress though, and if they really wanted to pay for that payroll tax cut, they could go a long way towards doing that by gutting the U.N. budget. So far, nothing from the congress or any prodding from the presidential candidates.</p>
<p>India has already balked at the <i>deal</i>, meaning they won&#8217;t honor anything. If China goes the same way, that leaves Barack Obama to unilaterally destroy manufacturing and energy production in the United States, while <i>simultaneously</i> redistributing American tax dollars to regimes all over the world.</p>
<p>I wonder if they would ever let me moderate a presidential debate. I bet Newt wouldn&#8217;t be leading in the polls if I did, and John Huntsman wouldn&#8217;t even be a candidate. Until then, we&#8217;ll have to deal with the half-assed pre-screened questions that tell us almost nothing of how a candidate will conduct themselves as president. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rjjrdq.com/2011/12/11/u-n-climate-fraudsters-reach-latest-deal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Climate Change Being Used to Push Mass Migration Agenda</title>
		<link>http://rjjrdq.com/2011/12/04/climate-change-being-used-to-push-mass-migration-agenda/</link>
		<comments>http://rjjrdq.com/2011/12/04/climate-change-being-used-to-push-mass-migration-agenda/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 01:31:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rjjrdq</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[New World Order]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjjrdq.com/?p=4961</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>As the media presents the only two presidential candidates America will be allowed to choose from in 2012, there is other news out there that is being implanted into the American psyche at the same time. I talked recently about climate fraud being alive and well, and if the trillions of dollars being asked [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As the media presents the only two presidential candidates America will be allowed to choose from in 2012, there is other news out there that is being implanted into the American psyche at the same time. I talked recently about climate fraud being alive and well, and if the <i>trillions</i> of dollars being asked for doesn&#8217;t raise a red flag and expose the agenda, then I don&#8217;t know what will. Thousands of hacked e-mails from the University of East Anglia exposed the fraud a few years back, but not only did it not go away, it has exposed another prong in the agenda. Politically and logistically, redistributing wealth is a daunting task on an international level. But what if everybody was in the same place? Or at least the same region of the world? That&#8217;s the latest plan. To not only redistribute wealth, but to redistribute populations.<span id="more-4961"></span></p>
<p>As the United Nations hosts climate fraud talks in Durban, they simultaneously are hosting <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/climate-may-cause-substantial-population-shifts-150043701.html" target="_blank">migration fraud talks</a> in Paris. The <i>Global Migration Group</i>, (GMG), an organization made up of 14 United Nations agencies are sounding their own alarm bell in regards to <i>climate change,</i> and their solution is to flood so-called <i>rich</i> countries with the poorest of the poor.</p>
<p>Their rhetoric includes tales of lost territories from flooding, and unlivable lands due to desertification-all courtesy of man-made climate change. This, in their analysis, would necessitate <i>mass migration</i> of large segments of the global population to safer areas, which coincidentally happen to be the same aforementioned <i>rich countries.</i> Staggering coincidence.</p>
<p>Of course, through the reams of BS pumped out by the U.N., eventually the real agenda shows itself, and the GMG showed their hand as well.</p>
<blockquote><p>The GMG urged states to adopt &#8220;human rights and human development-oriented&#8221; measures to improve the lives of those exposed to the effects of climate change and increase their resilience to it.</p>
<p>&#8220;In the long term, states may wish to review existing legal instruments and policy framework to identify possible new solutions to the situation of those who move in relation to climate change,&#8221; the group said.</p></blockquote>
<p>Human rights. Remember, the State Department came up with a U.N. report in which they attacked Arizona and SB 1070 for human rights violations. <i>Human development-oriented.</i> That would be your redistribution right there. To improve lives you know&#8230;</p>
<p>Then they get into rewriting the immigration laws of sovereign nations. <i>Review existing legal instruments.</i> Immigration laws. So that&#8217;s it. Amnesty and redistribution of wealth. Remember, the U.N. already said that it will take $45 trillion to fix this problem.</p>
<p>I realize that not all countries have the resources of a United States. Not that we&#8217;re using them all, but we have them. That is a very small number though. Most countries have a wealth of resources and would and could be rich-if they weren&#8217;t so corrupt.</p>
<p>But if the agenda is one world government, the outdated notion of prosperous nation states is a threat, logistically and ideologically. So while John Boehner sits idle while the United States continues to fund its own demise, the U.N. agenda continues unimpeded, with the knowledge that we have a weak-kneed congress and a friend in the White House. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rjjrdq.com/2011/12/04/climate-change-being-used-to-push-mass-migration-agenda/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Bashes U.S. at APEC Conference</title>
		<link>http://rjjrdq.com/2011/11/14/obama-bashes-u-s-at-apec-conference/</link>
		<comments>http://rjjrdq.com/2011/11/14/obama-bashes-u-s-at-apec-conference/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 01:47:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rjjrdq</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Globalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[APEC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeffrey Immelt]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjjrdq.com/?p=4916</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Has this guy ever said anything good about the United States when he&#8217;s gone overseas? I can&#8217;t think of a time where he hasn&#8217;t bashed this country in one form or another in front of a foreign audience. This week was no exception, and the gall of it all is that he was complaining [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has this guy ever said anything good about the United States when he&#8217;s gone overseas? I can&#8217;t think of a time where he hasn&#8217;t bashed this country in one form or another in front of a foreign audience. This week was no exception, and the gall of it all is that he was complaining that foreign investment was stagnating in the U.S., even as he was looking to give away what is left of the United States.<span id="more-4916"></span></p>
<p>Barack Obama <a href="http://politics.blogs.foxnews.com/2011/11/13/president-obama-us-gotten-bit-lazy-attracting-businesses" target="_blank">made his way to the APEC conference</a> this weekend in Hawaii, the land of his phony birth certificate (I haven&#8217;t forgotten). The idea was to <del datetime="2011-11-14T01:33:13+00:00">discuss</del> give away jobs to Asia, and there were plenty of takers there. He brought along with him executives from some of the biggest companies based in the United States, as he did when he went to India, and when he went to Brazil. This included GE&#8217;s Jeffrey Immelt, who&#8217;s company has <a href="http://www.sustainablebusiness.com/index.cfm/go/news.display/id/21390" target="_blank">invested millions</a> in countries like Brazil and China. In fact, GE just shut down the headquarters of its 115 year old X-Ray division in Waukesha, Wisconsin and shipped the jobs to Beijing. Now Obama gives him-and other execs, a seat at the table with China&#8217;s Hu Jin Tao at this conference. How many more jobs will be lost as a result of this <i>conference</i> remains to be seen. We can be sure though, that jobs <i>will be lost.</i> That may not be all though. There are growing concerns that GE is <a href="http://www.allgov.com/US_and_the_World/ViewNews/Is_GE_Helping_Chinese_Communists_Develop_Advanced_Military_Aviation_Technology_111107" target="_blank">sharing sensitive military applicable technology</a> with the Chinese. Yeah, Obama&#8217;s jobs Czar.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, Obama is showing nothing but contempt for the American worker, even as he replaces them with low wage immigrants-legal or otherwise. I&#8217;ve already gone over where the good jobs are going.</p>
<p>Obama said at the conference that the United States has <i>gotten lazy</i> in attracting foreign investment. The companies he&#8217;s referring to are the mom and pops that are competing with the likes of GE. Walmart has been very successful in running small businesses out of town-and out of the country for that matter, and companies like GE, known in business circles as <i>pioneers</i> of outsourcing are doing the same. What Obama was saying was just a continuation of the America bashing he engaged in last month in San Francisco.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Anybody been to Beijing Airport lately? Or driven on high-speed rail in Asia or Europe? What&#8217;s changed? Well, we&#8217;ve lost our ambition, our imagination, and our willingness to do the things that built the Golden Gate Bridge and Hoover Dam and unleashed all the potential in this country.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Really? Is that it? Our ambition? He continued on, and&#8230;I don&#8217;t know if he was joking around, or he thought he could BS the world. He bragged that his regime has <i>made it easier</i> to navigate the spider web of regulations that any company has to traverse in order to set up shop in the United States. He&#8217;s the king of strangling regulations, but he actually stood there and tried to convince guys like Hu Jin Tao, that the onerous, expensive proposition of setting up shop in the United States was not only worth it, but not that difficult.</p>
<p>Well, China has taken advantage of investment opportunities in the U.S., but instead of hiring American workers, they ship in their own. Not exactly a win-win. If you ask guys like Jeffrey Immelt though, the future <i>is there,</i> not here.</p>
<p>Once again, Barack Obama has made an ass out of himself and embarrassed America at the same time. Countries like China and Brazil must falling off their proverbial chairs seeing how badly Obama and his gaggle of execs want to gut the U.S. and turn bloody, communist and Marxist nightmares into economic and military powerhouses. Four more years? Can we even afford four more months? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rjjrdq.com/2011/11/14/obama-bashes-u-s-at-apec-conference/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Climate Fraud is Alive and Well</title>
		<link>http://rjjrdq.com/2011/11/03/climate-fraud-is-alive-and-well/</link>
		<comments>http://rjjrdq.com/2011/11/03/climate-fraud-is-alive-and-well/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 04:19:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rjjrdq</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Socialist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Muller]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjjrdq.com/?p=4896</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Remember the global warming hockey stick graph, the alleged final word of proof that the earth was warming at such an ungodly rate that we should all be dead already? It&#8217;s baaack, but this time with a different face, and for the global warming fraudsters perpetuating this myth, hopefully a little less laughable than [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://rjjrdq.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/si-berkeley-earth-graph.jpg"><img src="http://rjjrdq.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/si-berkeley-earth-graph.jpg" alt="" title="si-berkeley-earth-graph" width="220" height="173" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-4898" /></a>Remember the global warming <i>hockey stick</i> graph, the alleged final word of proof that the earth was warming at such an ungodly rate that we should all be dead already? It&#8217;s baaack, but this time with a different face, and for the global warming fraudsters perpetuating this myth, hopefully a little less laughable than the last scheme. This time, they&#8217;ve tapped a Berkeley liberal who has apparently pretended to be a skeptic all along. Suddenly though, he has seen the light.<span id="more-4896"></span></p>
<p>Richard Muller, a Berkeley University physics professor has come up with <a href="http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/manitoba/story/2011/11/03/climate-change-berkley-muller.html"target="_blank">yet another study</a> that shows the earth warming at such an alarming rate, that his graph resembles Michael Mann&#8217;s infamous hockey stick graph that has been proven a fraud. His conclusion is that the earth is warming right in line with the United Nation&#8217;s predictions, although one of the co-authors of the study disputes the assertion.</p>
<p>This isn&#8217;t the only story I&#8217;ve seen on <i>climate change</i> in the last few days. The AP, who has been in the tank on the global warming fraud from the beginning are <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/biggest-jump-ever-seen-global-warming-gases-183955211.html" target="_blank">sounding the alarm</a> bells, equating man made greenhouse gases with global warming. Not only has this not been proven to be the case, the <i>climategate</i> scandal exposed how <i>scientists</i> actively sought to cover up data that would prove otherwise. Nevertheless, the bogus numbers that came out of the University of East Anglia made it into the IPCC report and suddenly that became the bible of global warming. Never mind that the U.N. themselves acknowledge the bad numbers and false attributions in the report. Most people don&#8217;t even know about that.</p>
<p>Did you think the social justice engineers were just going to let this die? The U.N. wants $45 <i>TRILLION</I> for this fraud. We aren&#8217;t talking about nickels and dimes here. We&#8217;re talking about a massive shift of wealth not seen in human history. Even Phil Jones at East Anglia concedes we&#8217;re entering a cooling phase. Doesn&#8217;t matter. This Muller character has decided that we&#8217;re warming, and contrary to the evidence that&#8217;s what the mainstream line will be. What a coincidence, just in time for a major U.N. meeting on climate change in a few weeks. We know what report they&#8217;ll be touting this time around.</p>
<p>So while the mainstrem media diverts us with Herman Cain&#8217;s adventures with the ladies, this multi-trillon dollar fraud is still at full tilt. If Barack Obama gets another four years, we can expect to see the United States gutted in the name of social justice, citing data from NASA and the NOAA that even <i>they admit</i> is <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2010/03/30/nasa-data-worse-than-climategate-data/" target="_blank">even more faulty</a> than the crap from East Anglia!</p>
<p> Socialists can&#8217;t create anything. They can only <i>redistribute</i> as they see fit. Anybody with even a reasonable I.Q. can see how eventually, that translates into everyone eventually being broke. Well, almost everyone. While we will ride bicycles and stand in line for green batteries, guys like Obama will be cruising in limousines and Lear Jets the rest of his life. This global warming <i>revolution</i> is for us, not for them. And who&#8217;s going to put a stop to this? Hell, we even have Republicans on board with this fraud. Open borders and money being siphoned out of the country faster than a job being shipped to China. This is Obama&#8217;s first term. It&#8217;s the second round where the action happens. No accountability, and no worries about reelection.</p>
<p>We don&#8217;t have another election cycle. The Republican establishment are pushing Mitt Romney as their man. A global warming believer. Do you think he&#8217;s the man for the job? All I can say is that he probably won&#8217;t be as gung ho as Obama. But, he&#8217;ll keep the myth alive. And like a Friday the 13th sequel, it&#8217;ll just keep coming back. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rjjrdq.com/2011/11/03/climate-fraud-is-alive-and-well/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gadhaffi Death Perfectly Timed</title>
		<link>http://rjjrdq.com/2011/10/22/gadhaffi-death-perfectly-timed/</link>
		<comments>http://rjjrdq.com/2011/10/22/gadhaffi-death-perfectly-timed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Oct 2011 07:51:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rjjrdq</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arab Spring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Egypt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moammar Gadhafi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjjrdq.com/?p=4859</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I say, give credit where credit is due. Apparently, Barack Obama doesn&#8217;t feel the same way. He has no problem taking credit for somebody else&#8217;s plan. Well, why not? Taking credit for his own plans would be a disaster. That&#8217;s all right Barry, I&#8217;ll give you all the credit you deserve.</p> <p>The timing of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I say, give credit where credit is due. Apparently, Barack Obama doesn&#8217;t feel the same way. He has no problem taking credit for somebody else&#8217;s plan. Well, why not? Taking credit for his own plans would be a disaster. That&#8217;s all right Barry, I&#8217;ll give you all the credit you deserve.<span id="more-4859"></span></p>
<p>The timing of all this must seem extraordinary even to the most hardcore social justice pundits and useful idiot minons. Egyptians magically revolts against Hosni Mubarak after 30 years, and as the Muslim Brotherhood spread their wings across the rest of the Arab Street, Bin Laden suddenly ends up dead, although his body was <i>disposed</i> of so quickly, there is no way to confirm the event actually occurred. We have the Palestinians-a group of thugs that even other Muslim nations can&#8217;t seem to stomach, make their pitch for statehood at the expense of Israel&#8217;s borders. Obama encouraged it, and now the Palestinians are on the verge of having the United Nations unilaterally declare them a state. Then we had the illegal war in Libya, where Obama violated the <i>War Powers</i> act. After a few days of barking from the Republicans, it suddenly became a non-issue. Even clowns like John McCain jumped on board with the al-Qaeda led rebels in that country. Anything to get rid of Gadhaffi, eh, John? Well, he got his wish, apparently. We&#8217;ve all heard the news now, that Moammar <i>the man with a thousand spellings</i> Gadhaffi, has been not only overthrown, but killed. Graphic images purport to show the former Libyan dictator in his final seconds. Something we <i>didn&#8217;t</i> get with Bin Laden.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s all happening so fast, democracy is taking hold at breathtaking speed, Obama&#8217;s policies are so wondrous-let&#8217;s put some icing on the cake. Barry has announced that the last troops will leave Iraq at the end of the year. It&#8217;s a promise he made, and he&#8217;s sticking to it. The problem is, that the <i>promise</i> was made under George Bush in 2008. The agreement then was to have <i>all troops</i> out of Iraq before 2012. That is exactly the plan Obama is implementing. He&#8217;s getting the credit, but it isn&#8217;t his plan at all. However, it fits nicely with the rest of the events in the Middle East this year.</p>
<p>Sounds <i>just great</i>, doesn&#8217;t it? Well, here&#8217;s what has been left in the wake of this <i>Arab Spring.</i> The Muslim Brotherhood is set to take over in Egypt, with the largest army in the Middle East and control of the Suez Canal. The Coptic Christians being slaughtered in Egypt aren&#8217;t too happy about it, but hey, the pangs of democracy can be painful&#8230;Iran is on the verge of nuclear capability, and they&#8217;ve already expressed their intent to use nuclear weapons. A defenseless Iraq must be happy about that. I blame George Bush for that fiasco. Now we have al-Qaeda in oil rich Libya. There&#8217;s still a no-fly zone there for now. Why is that? These <i>rebels</i> have been warned by NATO that <i>they themselves</i> will be subject to bombing raids unless they knock off the brutal human rights abuses they are currently committing. Nice Job Barry.</p>
<p>We can&#8217;t forget Afghanistan. With no plan at all, and the Taliban just waiting for us to leave, Barry&#8217;s plan is to negotiate with <i>moderate</i> elements. Head chopping, female circumcising, woman stoning, anti-Western monsters see <i>negotiation</i> as weakness. They&#8217;ll just wait it out in Pakistan until the troops leave.</p>
<p>Oh, yeah, Pakistan. The same country that handed nuclear technology over to North Korea and Syria&#8230;Oh yeah, Syria, who&#8217;s leader is engaging in a slaughter that would make Gadhaffi proud. Barry&#8217;s done nothing there.</p>
<p>If there was ever a better example of destabilization, it would be Barack Obama&#8217;s Middle East policy. Long after he leaves, the rest of the world will have to deal with the mess he&#8217;s left. Only this time, al-Qaeda and its parent, the Muslim Brotherhood will have billions of dollars in oil revenue, and financial aid from the dhimmi West in order to continue their conquest of the world. That&#8217;s not rhetoric that&#8217;s the stated goal of the <i>brotherhood.</i></p>
<p>Do you think Mitt Romney can clean that up? I haven&#8217;t heard much from him on foreign policy. What about Rick Perry? Right. Herman Cain even admits he has no foreign policy knowledge. Any of the rest of them? Well, you never know who will step up to the plate when the game is on the line, but right now, I don&#8217;t see anyone equipped to deal with mess Obama has left. Even more disturbing is that Obama could get another four years to turn the Arab Spring into a worldwide spring, like the <i>occupy Wall Street</i> debacle, the anarchist encrusted WTO protests, the million man illegal immigration marches-what do you know, those things are already occurring.</p>
<p>If the timing of these events doesn&#8217;t convince you they are contrived, I don&#8217;t know what to say to convince you. Anybody on the right will be better than Obama, but at the same time, we can&#8217;t afford the lesser of two evils. Obama has wrought havoc on not only the United States, but the world. We need someone who can do a cleanup of historic proportions. Who&#8217;s going to step up? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rjjrdq.com/2011/10/22/gadhaffi-death-perfectly-timed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mexican Trucks to Roll In U.S. Next Week</title>
		<link>http://rjjrdq.com/2011/10/20/mexican-trucks-to-roll-in-u-s-next-week/</link>
		<comments>http://rjjrdq.com/2011/10/20/mexican-trucks-to-roll-in-u-s-next-week/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 05:04:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rjjrdq</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[North American Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Duncan Hunter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jimmy Hoffa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NAFTA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Teamsters]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjjrdq.com/?p=4856</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve asked the question before, for all those that support the Obama social justice, open borders, Marxist nightmare. You might love what he&#8217;s doing in a dreamy, ignorant sort of way, but what happens the day he comes for you? The day that you stand to lose as a result? Well, we&#8217;re getting a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve asked the question before, for all those that support the Obama social justice, open borders, Marxist nightmare. You might love what he&#8217;s doing in a dreamy, ignorant sort of way, but what happens the day he comes for you? The day that <i>you</i> stand to lose as a result? Well, we&#8217;re getting a taste of that right now.<span id="more-4856"></span></p>
<p>While union thugs cracked skulls at town hall meetings during the Obamacare <i>debate</i>, and then tormented Wisconsin earlier this year, with a <i>get out of Obamacare free</i> card now in their pockets, they probably never thought Obama would throw <i>them</i> under the bus. But, as Obama tends to do with useful idiots over time, that&#8217;s just what he&#8217;s done.</p>
<p>The ugly head of NAFTA has reared its ugly head once again, and as a result, Mexican trucks are <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/1st-mexican-truck-enter-us-interior-within-days-184747565.html" target="_blank">set to roll</a> on American soil next week. Instead of handing off loads to union truckers at the border, Mexican truckers can now drive their smoking death traps <i>door to door</i>-with whatever their delivery might be. The result will be a loss of American jobs-and a new way for drug traffickers to get their goods into the United States. This caught the attention of Rep. Duncan Hunter (R-Ca), and none other than the Teamsters head thug, Jimmy Hoffa. Yes, the same one that encouraged crowds to <i>take these sons of bitches out</i>, in reference to the tea party, stood along side Hunter, who is as tea party minded as anybody. I put Hunter right up there with Tom Tancredo on border security, and he would have been my second pick after Tancredo in the 2008 Republican primaries. Now Hunter stands side by side with Hoffa, something you wouldn&#8217;t expect to see in this political climate. But Hunter is standing for the sovereignty of America. Hoffa is trying to preserve the Teamsters. In the end though, they were both at the border in an effort to save American jobs.</p>
<p>NAFTA is a &#8220;free trade&#8221; agreement that was signed into law by Bill Clinton, championed by George Bush, and now being put into overdrive by Barack Obama. All without the consent or the voice of the American people. NAFTA has cost thousands of American jobs already, and this move will cost thousands more, with estimates being as high as 100,000.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s just part of the problem. The cartels will use this program to their advantage, shipping in more drugs and <i>human cargo</i> than ever before. The United States couldn&#8217;t-or wouldn&#8217;t stop it before, so what is there now to make us believe they will stop it now on an even bigger scale?</p>
<blockquote><p>Criminal activity has been a problem for years even within the U.S. government&#8217;s strictest trusted carrier programs. Drug trafficking organizations have smuggled tons of drugs inside trucks driven by approved truckers coming from inspected and certified facilities inside Mexico.</p></blockquote>
<p>Not to mention the weapons. Now, <i>Fast and Furious</i> can continue with no oversight at all. Drugs in, weapons out. And who&#8217;s going to stop it? the $40,000 a year inspector at the border that was just either threatened or bought off?</p>
<p>No rhetoric, no political posturing, no <i>xenophobia</i> accusations. Two individuals that are diametrically opposed on almost every issue can agree on this. Mexican trucks rolling into the U.S. is a bad idea. It&#8217;s dangerous, it will cost American jobs, and it will enrich drug cartels who will use the program as their own personal transportation line. Hunter can&#8217;t overturn NAFTA on his own, but he and Peter DeFazio (a Democrat) are sponsoring a bill the would require Congress to continually approve this program to keep it going. Given the unpopular nature of the program, the bill sounds like a good idea.</p>
<p>No, not even the libs can stomach this one. I ask you socialists again: What happens when Obama comes for you? Hate to say I told you so, but I did. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rjjrdq.com/2011/10/20/mexican-trucks-to-roll-in-u-s-next-week/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#8217;s Palestinian Debacle</title>
		<link>http://rjjrdq.com/2011/09/20/obamas-palestinian-debacle/</link>
		<comments>http://rjjrdq.com/2011/09/20/obamas-palestinian-debacle/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 02:24:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rjjrdq</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palestinian Authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjjrdq.com/?p=4788</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Well, he shot his mouth off, calling on Israel to unilaterally return to its indefensible 1967 borders. The demand was met with, depending on who you asked, with mild irritation, or outrage from Israel and any supporters. The Palestinians, realizing what a stupid request it was in the first place, took matters into their [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, he shot his mouth off, calling on Israel to <i>unilaterally</i> return to its indefensible 1967 borders. The <i>demand</i> was met with, depending on who you asked, with mild irritation, or outrage from Israel and any supporters. The Palestinians, realizing what a stupid request it was in the first place, took matters into their own hands. Botched foreign policy in action.<span id="more-4788"></span></p>
<p>Since Obama took office, he has shown nothing but contempt for Israel. He couldn&#8217;t come out and outright demonize the tiny country, because he had the Jewish vote on his side in the United States. That bode well in states like Florida. He also had the Muslim albatross around his neck, which caused him to move slower than he would have liked to. How that albatross translated into Jewish votes is anybody&#8217;s guess. My guess is it&#8217;s a party thing, not an Obama infatuation. He&#8217;s moved fast enough though. Bankrolling the <i>Arab spring,</i> letting Iran continue their nuclear weapons program, funding the Palestinian Authority to the tune of $390 million a year, all the while admonishing Israel over building settlements on what is their land-not the Palestinians. Obama backs a Palestinian state. He backs one with Israel shrunk to its 1967 borders, with a now hostile Egypt next door. <i>Remember 1973?</i> Now Abbas and the rest of the goons at the PO are forcing his hand. It&#8217;s put up or shut up.</p>
<p>It looks like the Palestinian Authority has the votes in the U.N. to declare themselves a state. A state within Israel as well. Remember, the PO wants Israel pushed back, and if this votes goes through as expected, they will assume that land is theirs. It is not, and Israel will make that very clear. You can see what&#8217;s going to happen here. Mahmoud Abbas has already stated he will not recognize an Israeli state. Now he&#8217;s going for statehood, sending the the mother of four suicide bombers to the U.N. as an emissary. You can&#8217;t make this up. He&#8217;s going to try and wrench sympathy from the U.N. with the mother of suicidal thugs. It looks like it might work too. That means problems, certainly for Israel, but for Barack Obama as well.</p>
<p>He set this up, he coaxed the PO, and now that these unpredictable savages have gone off the rails, Obama is realizing that he doesn&#8217;t have the control that he thought. Funny, he made that same mistake domestically. If the U.S. vetoes the PO bid, it will go against everything Obama promised. The difference is, Obama wanted Israel to capitulate. Now it&#8217;s going to get bloody. Not only that, congress is for the most part pro-Israel, and Abbas and co. would see their gravy train from the U.S. cut off in such a case. There&#8217;s even legislation floating around that would gut the money going to the U.N. Well, if there was anything positive about the PO declaring themselves a state, its that the United States would save a boatload of what is now wasted money.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ll see what the Muslim empty suit does. It&#8217;s going to take a real leader to step up now, and as we know, Obama is no leader. But he is a Muslim, and to throw his people under the bus now would be a disaster for him. He knows he can&#8217;t stop Israel from defending itself. I&#8217;m sure the Muslim street expects him to try. I wish he would. Maybe we could get rid of him even faster. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rjjrdq.com/2011/09/20/obamas-palestinian-debacle/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>al-Qaeda Joins the United Nations</title>
		<link>http://rjjrdq.com/2011/09/17/al-qaeda-joins-the-united-nations/</link>
		<comments>http://rjjrdq.com/2011/09/17/al-qaeda-joins-the-united-nations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Sep 2011 06:14:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rjjrdq</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[al Qaeda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjjrdq.com/?p=4782</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not the first person to suggest that Barack Obama is not only taking orders from the United Nations, but that ultimately, he may run for Secretary General of the corrupt, socialist dictrocracy. As self-destructive as they are dangerous, their latest move, facilitated by all the resources Barack Obama could heap upon them (courtesy [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not the first person to suggest that Barack Obama is not only taking orders from the United Nations, but that ultimately, he may run for Secretary General of the corrupt, socialist dictrocracy. As self-destructive as they are dangerous, their latest move, facilitated by all the resources Barack Obama could heap upon them (courtesy the U.S. taxpayer) shouldn&#8217;t be surprising given the honors they&#8217;ve bestowed on thugs in the past.<span id="more-4782"></span></p>
<p>The U.N. General Assembly <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/world/2011/09/16/libyas-united-nations-seat-approved/" target="_blank">voted overwhelmingly</a> to hand what was formerly Libya&#8217;s seat in the world body to the rebels that now control that country. Yes, Libya did have a voice in the international matters of the United Nations. Remember when they invited him to New York to blather on and on? Well, now they&#8217;ve voted the rebels to do the same.</p>
<p>The rebels-or transitional council (whatever they call themselves) are being led by a guy named <a href="http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2011/09/14/rebel_rupture?page=0,<a href="http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2011/09/14/rebel_rupture?page=0,0" target="_blank">Mustafa Abdel Jalil</a>. Don&#8217;t know him? He was the former justice minister under Ghadaffi. You saw that right, an ex Ghadaffi thug is now <i>the head of the rebels.</i> Justice Minister. Of course, we know what kind of justice Ghadaffi exacted on his people, and now the administer himself has maneuvered himself into the graces of the United Nations. Not all the various tribes in Libya are happy with this guy, nor should they be. But just in case things get out of hand in Libya between the various rebel factions, Jalil has created a brutal buffer between himself and the unwashed masses.</p>
<p>Keep in mind that the new head of security for the rebels has <a href="http://haeha.net/2011/09/05/terrific-libyas-new-security-head-admits-to-al-qaeda-ties-human-events/" target="_blank">admitted that he is al-Qaeda</a>. Freeing fellow jihadists from Libyan prisons and shipping looted Libyan weapons to al-Qaeda factions solidify the claim. The very thugs that we are supposedly battling in the war on terrorism, and now not only has Obama installed them as a regime in Libya, but the United Nations has invited them to have a voice in international affairs.</p>
<p>The United States contributes by far more money to the U.N. than any other country. Now al-Qaeda will have a say where that money goes. You can&#8217;t make this up. Currently, it is the Republicans that hold the purse strings to the U.N. What will they do? Don&#8217;t ask John McCain, he thinks the rebels are just great. Luckily he can&#8217;t cut a check to the rebels. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen is the chair of the U.S. House Foreign Affairs Committee. Her committee could recommend a cut off today. Do you think Boehner and golfing buddy Obama would let that happen?</p>
<p>The next president-should Barry be deposed will have more to deal with than just domestic issues. I know, you&#8217;ve heard <i>nothing</i> else from them, but unraveling what Obama has wrought in the Middle East is going to take someone with brains and knowledge of what is actually happening there. Do any of the candidates sound like they fit that bill? Not to me, and maybe that&#8217;s why they&#8217;re getting a pass on anything but the economy in the debates.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sounding the alarm right now. The rebels unfortunately are <i>exactly</i> who they appear to be and it looks like Obama and his handlers at the U.N. are putting them on a pedestal while our troops fight them in two other wars in different parts of the world. Speak up candidates. If you need an advisor, shoot me an e-mail. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rjjrdq.com/2011/09/17/al-qaeda-joins-the-united-nations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Hands Libya to al-Qaeda</title>
		<link>http://rjjrdq.com/2011/07/17/obama-hands-libya-to-al-qaida/</link>
		<comments>http://rjjrdq.com/2011/07/17/obama-hands-libya-to-al-qaida/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 03:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rjjrdq</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[al Qaeda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ghadaffi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjjrdq.com/?p=4596</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>While the bitching and moaning over how much more money we can spend rages in Washington, the United States the Obama regime has given an entire country to the enemies that we are supposedly at war with.</p> <p>Despite the fact that the Libyan rebels are soaked in Hezbollah and al-Qaeda thugs, the administration has [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While the bitching and moaning over how much more money we can spend rages in Washington, the <del datetime="2011-07-18T03:45:36+00:00">United States</del> the Obama regime has given an entire country to the enemies that we are supposedly at war with.</p>
<p>Despite the fact that the Libyan <i>rebels</i> are soaked in Hezbollah and al-Qaeda thugs, the administration has given them <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/middle-east/western-arab-leaders-meet-in-turkey-on-libyas-future/2011/07/15/gIQAZLbjFI_story.html?hpid=z3" target="_blank"><i>full diplomatic recognition</i></a> as the governing authority in Libya. In other words, they have given the country over to terrorists. No, Ghadaffi is no saint. Noone in the Middle East and North Africa is, but the monsters that just received Libya as a gift are even worse.<span id="more-4596"></span></p>
<p>All the Obama regime needed was a <i>promise</i> that these rebels won&#8217;t be even worse than Ghadaffi. That was good enough for Hillary Clinton, one of the highest ranking dhimmis in the world.</p>
<blockquote><p>The rebels’ Transitional National Council “has offered important assurances today, including the promise to pursue a process of democratic reform that is inclusive both geographically and politically,” Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton said in an explanation of the decision to other foreign ministers.</p></blockquote>
<p>We promise, now give us some money. That money is on the way. This decision opens the door for the rebels to get their hands on $30 billion of Libyan assets. Al-Qaeda bank accounts will be ringing all over the world.</p>
<p><a href="/2011/04/01/libyan-rebels-may-be-al-qaida/" target="_blank">I&#8217;ve talked before</a> about how <i>all</i> the rebel fighters may be Hezbollah and al-Qaeda. Yes, all of them.</p>
<p>John Lee Anderson, staff writer for the <i>New Yorker</i> was on the ground in Libya in April, and he said the rebels numbered no more than 1000. He was there and that was his assessment. $30 billion? I questioned then the idea of supporting these goons. It looked to me like all terror, all the time.</p>
<blockquote><p>NATO Supreme Commander Admiral James Stavridis said that there were flickers of al-Qaida in the rebel ranks. Noman Benotman, al-Qaeda affiliate in Libya (although he claims to have renounced them) went even further, saying that there were 1000 jihadists fighting in Libya, including members of al-Qaeda and Hezbollah. Let’s do the math. Anderson says that there are no more than 1000 rebels in the fight. Benotman says that there are 1000 jihadists there right now. If these numbers are accurate, then the entire rebel force is made up of al-Qaeda and Hezbollah jihadists.</p></blockquote>
<p>Yet they are now recognized as the legitimate government in Libya.</p>
<p>Keep in mind that out troops are still in Iraq and Afghanistan. Obama is about to bankroll enough bullets to pile up the bodybags. Where is the so-called counterweight GOP? Troops will die because of this, and on a lesser note, Libya will be no better off. In fact, NATO has warned the <i>rebels</i> to stop whacking civilians. Correct, the same thing Ghadaffi was accused of.</p>
<p>You can&#8217;t replace crap with more crap and expect a different result. Or, you could say you can&#8217;t replace this Islam with that Islam and expect change. Don&#8217;t tell that to Obama though. Remember, he ignored Congress in pursuit of this. I think he planned to recognize the rebels al-Qaida all along. After all, he cleared the way for the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, so this should come as no suprise.</p>
<p>535 members of Congress (with a full house), and nobody has anything to say about this? Obama has handed an oil rich nation to the very thugs that would destroy America. Now they will have an endless supply of financing to do just that. Obama the destroyer-with a little help from his friends. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rjjrdq.com/2011/07/17/obama-hands-libya-to-al-qaida/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Global Cooling Explained</title>
		<link>http://rjjrdq.com/2011/07/05/global-cooling-explained/</link>
		<comments>http://rjjrdq.com/2011/07/05/global-cooling-explained/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2011 20:03:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rjjrdq</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[New World Order]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global warming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjjrdq.com/?p=4543</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>First we had global cooling. Remember that? Once that turned out to be bogus, they turned to global warming. Well, once the cooling trend started, they had to come up with something else. Climate change was that something. Now, any kind of change in the climate for any reason could be attributed to man. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First we had global cooling. Remember that? Once that turned out to be bogus, they turned to global warming. Well, once the cooling trend started, they had to come up with something else. Climate change was that something. Now, any kind of change in the climate for any reason could be attributed to man. Unfortunately for the climate goons, climates change naturally. They call it the four seasons. Finally they seemingly settled on their latest fraud, <i>Climate disruption.</i> The term has become such a butt of jokes though that they are now coming full circle and going back to global warming. Only the earth isn&#8217;t warming, it&#8217;s in a cooling trend, by their own admission. Well, they have an answer for that. Pollution is causing <i>global cooling.</i><span id="more-4543"></span></p>
<p>That is correct. The very same excuse they gave for global warming is now the exact same one they are using for global cooling. They-I say <i>they</i> but, does it matter who? <i>They</i> have decided that it is the evil <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2011/jul/04/sulphur-pollution-china-coal-climate" target="_blank">coal plants</a> that are <del datetime="2011-07-05T20:02:22+00:00">contributing</del> causing global cooling. The sulphur emissions apparently cause the atmosphere to cool. According to these geniuses, virtually all of it is coming from China. Once the communist nation cleans up those sulphur emissions, the global warming <i>trend</i> will continue. What a coincidence that Obama has promised to run coal companies out of business, and now he has <i>scientific</i> data to back him up.</p>
<p>Of course, these great scientists can&#8217;t even get their lies straight.</p>
<blockquote><p>The last decade was the hottest on record and the 10 warmest years have all occurred since 1998. But within that period, global surface temperatures did not show a rising trend, leading some to question whether climate change had stopped.</p></blockquote>
<p>Wait a minute? How can we have the 10 warmest years on record, and at the same time have the average temperatures <i>not rise?</i> Simple math would show that the temperatures would rise. Not according to these great thinkers. It&#8217;s the sulphur that&#8217;s cooling the earth-even though the temperatures are the hottest on record. Well, tied with the 1880&#8242;s. I guess there was global warming then as well&#8230;</p>
<p>This should sum it up. The report was given the thumbs up by none other than Michael Mann. You remember Michael, he&#8217;s the one that came up with the infamous &#8220;hockey stick&#8221; graph that showed a spike in world temperatures. He&#8217;s since been proven a fraud, so no surprise he condones this particular study.</p>
<p>The U.N. wants $45 trillion to combat <i>global</i> whatever. It doesn&#8217;t matter to them either. The goal is wealth redistribution, but if they don&#8217;t get their lies straight, not even the sheep are going to continue to fall for it. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rjjrdq.com/2011/07/05/global-cooling-explained/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

