<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>rjjrdq&#039;s America II &#187; Globalization</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rjjrdq.com/category/new-world-order/globalization/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rjjrdq.com</link>
	<description>Still good, still bad, and still absurd...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 05:25:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>China Warns Of Future Military Confrontation</title>
		<link>http://rjjrdq.com/2012/04/23/china-warns-of-future-military-confrontation/</link>
		<comments>http://rjjrdq.com/2012/04/23/china-warns-of-future-military-confrontation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 05:52:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rjjrdq</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjjrdq.com/?p=5161</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Against my vehement protests, the Republicans have put all their eggs in one basket, and all it will take is a few statisitical ticks-whether manufactured or not, and Barack Obama waltzes into a second term. The talk has been almost exclusively about the economy, the only deviations coming when the left dictates what social [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Against my vehement protests, the Republicans have put all their eggs in one basket, and all it will take is a few statisitical ticks-whether manufactured or not, and Barack Obama waltzes into a second term. The talk has been almost exclusively about the economy, the only deviations coming when the left dictates what social issues the Republicans will stumble over. At the same time, whoever ends up president after November, will have to deal with foreign policy. We&#8217;ve seen what Obama has done, handing the Middle East over to the Muslim Brotherhood and al-Qaeda, and continuing to line the coffers of an increasingly belligerent China. In fact, China has become so emboldened that they apparently no longer fear a military confrontation with the United States.<span id="more-5161"></span></p>
<p>Certainly the rise of China cannot be blamed on Barack Obama  alone. George Bush just loved shipping jobs overseas. But Obama is here now, and he&#8217;s accelerated the passing of the torch to the point where <i>they</i> consider themselves the superpower of the world. The Obama regime cleared China of charges of currency manipulation, even as American companies ship jobs to that country to take advantage of the manipulation that Obama says doesn&#8217;t exist. He then invited Hu Jin Tao to the White House and gave him exclusive access to CEO&#8217;s from the biggest American companies in order to ship out even more jobs. He&#8217;s funded <i>green</i> companies who turned around and shipped out jobs created with the dollars of American taxpayers. Now Obama wants to pare down the military, even as China builds theirs at a breakneck pace. With all the technology they&#8217;ve stolen-and continue to steal, they&#8217;re making great progress. And if you think Obama&#8217;s plan to gut the military was a domestic issue, guess again. China has taken note, and they like what they hear.</p>
<p>The U.S. is currently <a href="http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Southeast_Asia/ND24Ae01.html" target="blank">conducting joint naval exercises</a> with the Philippines near a disputed area of the South China Sea that China claims as their territory. One look at a map and you can see why countries such as the Philippines, Laos and Vietnam are balking at the claim. To further increase the already boiling tension in the region, the joint exercises consisted of retaking seized offshore oil and natural gas platforms. Yes, there is oil in the South China Sea, and China wants it all.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-17809959"><img src="http://rjjrdq.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/54145268__48951920_south_china-sea_1_466-11-300x225.gif" alt="" title="_54145268__48951920_south_china-sea_1_466-1" width="300" height="225" class="alignright size-medium wp-image-5164" /></a>In response to the exercises, a state run Chinese military newspaper warned of armed conflict, with the United States being the instigator.</p>
<p>It wasn&#8217;t that long ago that top brass in the Chinese military bragged that <a href="/2009/09/22/china-announces-they-can-kick-our-ass/" target="_blank">they could match</a> the United States bullet for bullet, even dangling the fact that most of the technology that fuels their military is directly stolen from our military. They said they could <i>match</i> our technology, not exceed it. They are also developing a missile that can <a href="/2010/12/29/start-treaty-debacle-emboldens-china/" target="_blank">sink an aircraft carrier</a>. Who would that be for? Obama is helping this along, praising the START treaty with Russia, even as China has conducted unprecedented miltary drills with our cold war foes.</p>
<p>Do you think Mittens will deal with this? We see what Obama is doing. Obama&#8217;s dream of no one country over another has backfired, and now a country that has no problem exterminating millions of its own people will soon be the biggest-and the baddest. Obama is so focused on his Alinskyan dream that he can&#8217;t see that his scheme has already failed. All he-and his predecessors have done is created yet another superpower, one you can be sure is not as benevolent as the United States. He&#8217;s already failed yet he pursues his goal like a handicapped machine, incapable of changing course.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, we&#8217;re along for Rainman&#8217;s ride, and the day China decides they don&#8217;t need our worthless dollar anymore they&#8217;ll pretty much do what they want, when they want. Remember, our military will be gutted, and our economy decimated. Not so with China. Add to that the fact that they manufacture 95 percent of rare earths, a critical component of advanced military weaponry, and if they should decide to cut that off-we&#8217;ll be back to sticks and stones.</p>
<p>Turn on the tube. You&#8217;ll hear about the economy and how much these boobs know how to create jobs. So far Mittens has ignored this giant hole in the boat. We can&#8217;t keep bailing much longer. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rjjrdq.com/2012/04/23/china-warns-of-future-military-confrontation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Karzai Brands The United States As &#8220;Demons&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://rjjrdq.com/2012/03/21/karzai-brands-the-united-states-as-demons/</link>
		<comments>http://rjjrdq.com/2012/03/21/karzai-brands-the-united-states-as-demons/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2012 04:23:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rjjrdq</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hamid Karzai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjjrdq.com/?p=5124</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The foreign policy that passes as Barack Obama&#8217;s world strategy can only be described as planned buffoonery. Hosni Mubarak was ridden out of Egypt with the United States cracking the whip behind him, all the while knowing the Muslim Brotherhood would be the beneficiary of this exercise in democracy. With permission from the U.N., [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The foreign policy that passes as Barack Obama&#8217;s world strategy can only be described as planned buffoonery. Hosni Mubarak was ridden out of Egypt with the United States cracking the whip behind him, all the while knowing the Muslim Brotherhood would be the beneficiary of this exercise in <i>democracy.</i> With permission from the U.N., Moammar Ghadaffi was deposed in Libya and ultimately executed by the al-Qaeda elements who have since assumed power. Iran is steaming towards nuclear weapons technology, while Obama tells Israel to hold tight. Of course he also told them to go back to 1967 borders and tear down settlements. He sits idly by while his pals in Syria slaughter their own people. Well, on the other hand, the alternative to Assad in Syria is probably much like the alternative in Egypt and Libya. We walked out of Iraq without so much as a drop of oil. The same cannot be said for China though. They got some pretty sweet deals, and none of it would have been possible without the blood of American soldiers. That brings us to Afghanistan. Yes, <i>we are</i> still there, and unless there is some kind of ulterior motive, makes absolutely no sense. Ironically, Hamid Karzai agrees.<span id="more-5124"></span></p>
<p>After the <i>accidental</i> burning of Korans in Afghanistan, the response was expected, but nonetheless abhorrent. People died as a result of the destruction of a cover to cover manual of intolerance and hate. Well, it all makes sense then. Shortly after that though, and incident that should justifiably piss off the Afghan people took place, and although tragic, you could make the case of a soldier going on a shooting rampage and killing innocent civilians was not entirely unexpected either.</p>
<p>Feigning outrage at the killings, Hamid Karzai met with relatives of the victims and through crocodile tears, <i>once again</i> <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/18/world/asia/gulf-widens-between-us-and-an-increasingly-hostile-karzai.html?_r=4&#038;pagewanted=all" target="_blank">expressed his contempt</a> for the United States.</p>
<blockquote><p>The strongest such outburst came Friday. “Let’s pray for God to rescue us from these two demons,” Mr. Karzai said, apparently holding back tears at a meeting with relatives of the massacre victims, and clearly referring to the United States and the Taliban in the same breath. “There are two demons in our country now.”</p></blockquote>
<p>He&#8217;s still taking those bags of money though. This is the same guy that threatened to join the Taliban if the United States didn&#8217;t bend to his will. This is the guy who has imposed <a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/nov/16/us-troops-battle-taliban-afghan-rules/" target="_blank">rules of engagement</a> that are so restrictive, that it would be almost impossible to be victorious in an armed conflict. Oh, what a coincidence, we&#8217;ve been in Afganistan over a decade and there&#8217;s no end in sight. We go back to the crazed soldier that went on the killing spree. Related?</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve said before that the mistake the West is making is thinking they are dealing with the West. They are not. Places like Afganistan are backward, corrupt, and live by the Koran-when it suits them. When it comes to infidels on their soil, <i>it suits them just fine.</i> If Karzai thinks the U.S. are a pack of demons and wants us to leave, we should oblige. Trying to bring that hell-hole into the 19th century will take decades, and that&#8217;s only if they want to go. So far, <i>they do not.</i> We should pack our gear, and leave a few F-16&#8242;s in the area to slap the Taliban around if they have any ideas of reforming a terror colony in Afghanistan.</p>
<p>But even Republicans-save Ron Paul, are talking about <i>conditions on the ground,</i> and other kinds of crazy things reserved for civilized countries. Over a decade in Afghanstan and they can&#8217;t even get a rag tag army together. Our troops are ready to go in 6-8 weeks. Compare and contrast. Again, unless there&#8217;s something about Afghanistan that the public is unaware of, we are just wasting time and American lives there.</p>
<p>When Karzai spoke of demons, he wasn&#8217;t clear as to whether it was the current demon, or the previous one he was referring to. The policies of both Bush and Obama in Afghanistan are almost identical, although Obama slobbers all over himself to apologize more often than Bush did. But that&#8217;s what Barry does in general. Here&#8217;s one more apology Barry should make: Telling Karzai we&#8217;re leaving. Sorry, but you&#8217;re on your own. Keep in touch. But we won&#8217;t get that. And unless Ron Paul becomes president, we won&#8217;t get it from Republicans either. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rjjrdq.com/2012/03/21/karzai-brands-the-united-states-as-demons/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.N. Climate Fraudsters Reach Latest Deal</title>
		<link>http://rjjrdq.com/2011/12/11/u-n-climate-fraudsters-reach-latest-deal/</link>
		<comments>http://rjjrdq.com/2011/12/11/u-n-climate-fraudsters-reach-latest-deal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 06:15:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rjjrdq</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Globalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjjrdq.com/?p=4971</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Other than Mr. Waffle Mitt Romney straddling the fence and the carbon nightmare Newt Gingrich rolling around on the couch with Nancy Pelosi, we haven&#8217;t heard the Republican presidential candidate address the issue of climate change with much vigor. However, they are all skeptics now, even if they had to flip-flop to get there. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Other than Mr. Waffle Mitt Romney straddling the fence and the carbon nightmare Newt Gingrich rolling around on the couch with Nancy Pelosi, we haven&#8217;t heard the Republican presidential candidate address the issue of <i>climate change</i> with much vigor. However, they are all <i>skeptics</i> now, even if they had to flip-flop to get there. With  the kind of money the socialists are talking about, it still doesn&#8217;t generate much reaction from the candidates. Strange, considering it is the engine that the global socialists are using to redistribute wealth. Which reminds me, none of the canidates have addressed the United Nations and their actions either. Well, we could make the Newt/Bolton connection, but other than that&#8230;Meanwhile, the climate fraudsters are hard at work, and have come up with their latest wealth redistribution <i>agreement.</i><span id="more-4971"></span></p>
<p>A United Nations <i>climate conference</i> in the AIDS wracked murder capital known as South Africa <a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2011/12/11/MN171MAVV2.DTL" target="_blank">has concluded</a>, and like other climate conferences, the issue centered around money.</p>
<p>This was basically an update to the expiring Kyoto Protocol, something George Bush pulled out of. Any nation that did sign on were <i>legally binded</i> to destroy themselves in an effort to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Of course, China and India weren&#8217;t on board then, and they weren&#8217;t on board this time either. Even they can recognize that this is a scam, but if they can pass themselves off as one of the <i>poor</i> countries designated in the agreement, there may be some money in it for them. It&#8217;s always about the money, and the U.N. always gives that away at some point. They have to if it&#8217;s a <i>legally binding</i> agreement.</p>
<blockquote><p>The deal also set up the bodies that will collect, govern and distribute tens of billions of dollars a year to poor countries to help them adapt to changing climate conditions and to move toward low-carbon economic growth.</p></blockquote>
<p>Remember, this is the same U.N. that wants $45 trillion to fight the <i>scourge</i> of global warming. Apparently, that tens of billions is <i>annually.</i></p>
<p>Folks, it is the United States that is funding its own demise. We can turn the spigot off to the United Nations, although we won&#8217;t get any help from the Muslim in chief in the White House. The Republicans do hold the purse strings in congress though, and if they really wanted to pay for that payroll tax cut, they could go a long way towards doing that by gutting the U.N. budget. So far, nothing from the congress or any prodding from the presidential candidates.</p>
<p>India has already balked at the <i>deal</i>, meaning they won&#8217;t honor anything. If China goes the same way, that leaves Barack Obama to unilaterally destroy manufacturing and energy production in the United States, while <i>simultaneously</i> redistributing American tax dollars to regimes all over the world.</p>
<p>I wonder if they would ever let me moderate a presidential debate. I bet Newt wouldn&#8217;t be leading in the polls if I did, and John Huntsman wouldn&#8217;t even be a candidate. Until then, we&#8217;ll have to deal with the half-assed pre-screened questions that tell us almost nothing of how a candidate will conduct themselves as president. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rjjrdq.com/2011/12/11/u-n-climate-fraudsters-reach-latest-deal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Bashes U.S. at APEC Conference</title>
		<link>http://rjjrdq.com/2011/11/14/obama-bashes-u-s-at-apec-conference/</link>
		<comments>http://rjjrdq.com/2011/11/14/obama-bashes-u-s-at-apec-conference/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 01:47:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rjjrdq</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Globalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[APEC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeffrey Immelt]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjjrdq.com/?p=4916</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Has this guy ever said anything good about the United States when he&#8217;s gone overseas? I can&#8217;t think of a time where he hasn&#8217;t bashed this country in one form or another in front of a foreign audience. This week was no exception, and the gall of it all is that he was complaining [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has this guy ever said anything good about the United States when he&#8217;s gone overseas? I can&#8217;t think of a time where he hasn&#8217;t bashed this country in one form or another in front of a foreign audience. This week was no exception, and the gall of it all is that he was complaining that foreign investment was stagnating in the U.S., even as he was looking to give away what is left of the United States.<span id="more-4916"></span></p>
<p>Barack Obama <a href="http://politics.blogs.foxnews.com/2011/11/13/president-obama-us-gotten-bit-lazy-attracting-businesses" target="_blank">made his way to the APEC conference</a> this weekend in Hawaii, the land of his phony birth certificate (I haven&#8217;t forgotten). The idea was to <del datetime="2011-11-14T01:33:13+00:00">discuss</del> give away jobs to Asia, and there were plenty of takers there. He brought along with him executives from some of the biggest companies based in the United States, as he did when he went to India, and when he went to Brazil. This included GE&#8217;s Jeffrey Immelt, who&#8217;s company has <a href="http://www.sustainablebusiness.com/index.cfm/go/news.display/id/21390" target="_blank">invested millions</a> in countries like Brazil and China. In fact, GE just shut down the headquarters of its 115 year old X-Ray division in Waukesha, Wisconsin and shipped the jobs to Beijing. Now Obama gives him-and other execs, a seat at the table with China&#8217;s Hu Jin Tao at this conference. How many more jobs will be lost as a result of this <i>conference</i> remains to be seen. We can be sure though, that jobs <i>will be lost.</i> That may not be all though. There are growing concerns that GE is <a href="http://www.allgov.com/US_and_the_World/ViewNews/Is_GE_Helping_Chinese_Communists_Develop_Advanced_Military_Aviation_Technology_111107" target="_blank">sharing sensitive military applicable technology</a> with the Chinese. Yeah, Obama&#8217;s jobs Czar.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, Obama is showing nothing but contempt for the American worker, even as he replaces them with low wage immigrants-legal or otherwise. I&#8217;ve already gone over where the good jobs are going.</p>
<p>Obama said at the conference that the United States has <i>gotten lazy</i> in attracting foreign investment. The companies he&#8217;s referring to are the mom and pops that are competing with the likes of GE. Walmart has been very successful in running small businesses out of town-and out of the country for that matter, and companies like GE, known in business circles as <i>pioneers</i> of outsourcing are doing the same. What Obama was saying was just a continuation of the America bashing he engaged in last month in San Francisco.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Anybody been to Beijing Airport lately? Or driven on high-speed rail in Asia or Europe? What&#8217;s changed? Well, we&#8217;ve lost our ambition, our imagination, and our willingness to do the things that built the Golden Gate Bridge and Hoover Dam and unleashed all the potential in this country.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Really? Is that it? Our ambition? He continued on, and&#8230;I don&#8217;t know if he was joking around, or he thought he could BS the world. He bragged that his regime has <i>made it easier</i> to navigate the spider web of regulations that any company has to traverse in order to set up shop in the United States. He&#8217;s the king of strangling regulations, but he actually stood there and tried to convince guys like Hu Jin Tao, that the onerous, expensive proposition of setting up shop in the United States was not only worth it, but not that difficult.</p>
<p>Well, China has taken advantage of investment opportunities in the U.S., but instead of hiring American workers, they ship in their own. Not exactly a win-win. If you ask guys like Jeffrey Immelt though, the future <i>is there,</i> not here.</p>
<p>Once again, Barack Obama has made an ass out of himself and embarrassed America at the same time. Countries like China and Brazil must falling off their proverbial chairs seeing how badly Obama and his gaggle of execs want to gut the U.S. and turn bloody, communist and Marxist nightmares into economic and military powerhouses. Four more years? Can we even afford four more months? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rjjrdq.com/2011/11/14/obama-bashes-u-s-at-apec-conference/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gadhaffi Death Perfectly Timed</title>
		<link>http://rjjrdq.com/2011/10/22/gadhaffi-death-perfectly-timed/</link>
		<comments>http://rjjrdq.com/2011/10/22/gadhaffi-death-perfectly-timed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Oct 2011 07:51:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rjjrdq</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arab Spring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Egypt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moammar Gadhafi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjjrdq.com/?p=4859</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I say, give credit where credit is due. Apparently, Barack Obama doesn&#8217;t feel the same way. He has no problem taking credit for somebody else&#8217;s plan. Well, why not? Taking credit for his own plans would be a disaster. That&#8217;s all right Barry, I&#8217;ll give you all the credit you deserve.</p> <p>The timing of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I say, give credit where credit is due. Apparently, Barack Obama doesn&#8217;t feel the same way. He has no problem taking credit for somebody else&#8217;s plan. Well, why not? Taking credit for his own plans would be a disaster. That&#8217;s all right Barry, I&#8217;ll give you all the credit you deserve.<span id="more-4859"></span></p>
<p>The timing of all this must seem extraordinary even to the most hardcore social justice pundits and useful idiot minons. Egyptians magically revolts against Hosni Mubarak after 30 years, and as the Muslim Brotherhood spread their wings across the rest of the Arab Street, Bin Laden suddenly ends up dead, although his body was <i>disposed</i> of so quickly, there is no way to confirm the event actually occurred. We have the Palestinians-a group of thugs that even other Muslim nations can&#8217;t seem to stomach, make their pitch for statehood at the expense of Israel&#8217;s borders. Obama encouraged it, and now the Palestinians are on the verge of having the United Nations unilaterally declare them a state. Then we had the illegal war in Libya, where Obama violated the <i>War Powers</i> act. After a few days of barking from the Republicans, it suddenly became a non-issue. Even clowns like John McCain jumped on board with the al-Qaeda led rebels in that country. Anything to get rid of Gadhaffi, eh, John? Well, he got his wish, apparently. We&#8217;ve all heard the news now, that Moammar <i>the man with a thousand spellings</i> Gadhaffi, has been not only overthrown, but killed. Graphic images purport to show the former Libyan dictator in his final seconds. Something we <i>didn&#8217;t</i> get with Bin Laden.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s all happening so fast, democracy is taking hold at breathtaking speed, Obama&#8217;s policies are so wondrous-let&#8217;s put some icing on the cake. Barry has announced that the last troops will leave Iraq at the end of the year. It&#8217;s a promise he made, and he&#8217;s sticking to it. The problem is, that the <i>promise</i> was made under George Bush in 2008. The agreement then was to have <i>all troops</i> out of Iraq before 2012. That is exactly the plan Obama is implementing. He&#8217;s getting the credit, but it isn&#8217;t his plan at all. However, it fits nicely with the rest of the events in the Middle East this year.</p>
<p>Sounds <i>just great</i>, doesn&#8217;t it? Well, here&#8217;s what has been left in the wake of this <i>Arab Spring.</i> The Muslim Brotherhood is set to take over in Egypt, with the largest army in the Middle East and control of the Suez Canal. The Coptic Christians being slaughtered in Egypt aren&#8217;t too happy about it, but hey, the pangs of democracy can be painful&#8230;Iran is on the verge of nuclear capability, and they&#8217;ve already expressed their intent to use nuclear weapons. A defenseless Iraq must be happy about that. I blame George Bush for that fiasco. Now we have al-Qaeda in oil rich Libya. There&#8217;s still a no-fly zone there for now. Why is that? These <i>rebels</i> have been warned by NATO that <i>they themselves</i> will be subject to bombing raids unless they knock off the brutal human rights abuses they are currently committing. Nice Job Barry.</p>
<p>We can&#8217;t forget Afghanistan. With no plan at all, and the Taliban just waiting for us to leave, Barry&#8217;s plan is to negotiate with <i>moderate</i> elements. Head chopping, female circumcising, woman stoning, anti-Western monsters see <i>negotiation</i> as weakness. They&#8217;ll just wait it out in Pakistan until the troops leave.</p>
<p>Oh, yeah, Pakistan. The same country that handed nuclear technology over to North Korea and Syria&#8230;Oh yeah, Syria, who&#8217;s leader is engaging in a slaughter that would make Gadhaffi proud. Barry&#8217;s done nothing there.</p>
<p>If there was ever a better example of destabilization, it would be Barack Obama&#8217;s Middle East policy. Long after he leaves, the rest of the world will have to deal with the mess he&#8217;s left. Only this time, al-Qaeda and its parent, the Muslim Brotherhood will have billions of dollars in oil revenue, and financial aid from the dhimmi West in order to continue their conquest of the world. That&#8217;s not rhetoric that&#8217;s the stated goal of the <i>brotherhood.</i></p>
<p>Do you think Mitt Romney can clean that up? I haven&#8217;t heard much from him on foreign policy. What about Rick Perry? Right. Herman Cain even admits he has no foreign policy knowledge. Any of the rest of them? Well, you never know who will step up to the plate when the game is on the line, but right now, I don&#8217;t see anyone equipped to deal with mess Obama has left. Even more disturbing is that Obama could get another four years to turn the Arab Spring into a worldwide spring, like the <i>occupy Wall Street</i> debacle, the anarchist encrusted WTO protests, the million man illegal immigration marches-what do you know, those things are already occurring.</p>
<p>If the timing of these events doesn&#8217;t convince you they are contrived, I don&#8217;t know what to say to convince you. Anybody on the right will be better than Obama, but at the same time, we can&#8217;t afford the lesser of two evils. Obama has wrought havoc on not only the United States, but the world. We need someone who can do a cleanup of historic proportions. Who&#8217;s going to step up? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rjjrdq.com/2011/10/22/gadhaffi-death-perfectly-timed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#8217;s Palestinian Debacle</title>
		<link>http://rjjrdq.com/2011/09/20/obamas-palestinian-debacle/</link>
		<comments>http://rjjrdq.com/2011/09/20/obamas-palestinian-debacle/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 02:24:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rjjrdq</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palestinian Authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjjrdq.com/?p=4788</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Well, he shot his mouth off, calling on Israel to unilaterally return to its indefensible 1967 borders. The demand was met with, depending on who you asked, with mild irritation, or outrage from Israel and any supporters. The Palestinians, realizing what a stupid request it was in the first place, took matters into their [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, he shot his mouth off, calling on Israel to <i>unilaterally</i> return to its indefensible 1967 borders. The <i>demand</i> was met with, depending on who you asked, with mild irritation, or outrage from Israel and any supporters. The Palestinians, realizing what a stupid request it was in the first place, took matters into their own hands. Botched foreign policy in action.<span id="more-4788"></span></p>
<p>Since Obama took office, he has shown nothing but contempt for Israel. He couldn&#8217;t come out and outright demonize the tiny country, because he had the Jewish vote on his side in the United States. That bode well in states like Florida. He also had the Muslim albatross around his neck, which caused him to move slower than he would have liked to. How that albatross translated into Jewish votes is anybody&#8217;s guess. My guess is it&#8217;s a party thing, not an Obama infatuation. He&#8217;s moved fast enough though. Bankrolling the <i>Arab spring,</i> letting Iran continue their nuclear weapons program, funding the Palestinian Authority to the tune of $390 million a year, all the while admonishing Israel over building settlements on what is their land-not the Palestinians. Obama backs a Palestinian state. He backs one with Israel shrunk to its 1967 borders, with a now hostile Egypt next door. <i>Remember 1973?</i> Now Abbas and the rest of the goons at the PO are forcing his hand. It&#8217;s put up or shut up.</p>
<p>It looks like the Palestinian Authority has the votes in the U.N. to declare themselves a state. A state within Israel as well. Remember, the PO wants Israel pushed back, and if this votes goes through as expected, they will assume that land is theirs. It is not, and Israel will make that very clear. You can see what&#8217;s going to happen here. Mahmoud Abbas has already stated he will not recognize an Israeli state. Now he&#8217;s going for statehood, sending the the mother of four suicide bombers to the U.N. as an emissary. You can&#8217;t make this up. He&#8217;s going to try and wrench sympathy from the U.N. with the mother of suicidal thugs. It looks like it might work too. That means problems, certainly for Israel, but for Barack Obama as well.</p>
<p>He set this up, he coaxed the PO, and now that these unpredictable savages have gone off the rails, Obama is realizing that he doesn&#8217;t have the control that he thought. Funny, he made that same mistake domestically. If the U.S. vetoes the PO bid, it will go against everything Obama promised. The difference is, Obama wanted Israel to capitulate. Now it&#8217;s going to get bloody. Not only that, congress is for the most part pro-Israel, and Abbas and co. would see their gravy train from the U.S. cut off in such a case. There&#8217;s even legislation floating around that would gut the money going to the U.N. Well, if there was anything positive about the PO declaring themselves a state, its that the United States would save a boatload of what is now wasted money.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ll see what the Muslim empty suit does. It&#8217;s going to take a real leader to step up now, and as we know, Obama is no leader. But he is a Muslim, and to throw his people under the bus now would be a disaster for him. He knows he can&#8217;t stop Israel from defending itself. I&#8217;m sure the Muslim street expects him to try. I wish he would. Maybe we could get rid of him even faster. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rjjrdq.com/2011/09/20/obamas-palestinian-debacle/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>al-Qaeda Joins the United Nations</title>
		<link>http://rjjrdq.com/2011/09/17/al-qaeda-joins-the-united-nations/</link>
		<comments>http://rjjrdq.com/2011/09/17/al-qaeda-joins-the-united-nations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Sep 2011 06:14:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rjjrdq</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[al Qaeda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjjrdq.com/?p=4782</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not the first person to suggest that Barack Obama is not only taking orders from the United Nations, but that ultimately, he may run for Secretary General of the corrupt, socialist dictrocracy. As self-destructive as they are dangerous, their latest move, facilitated by all the resources Barack Obama could heap upon them (courtesy [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not the first person to suggest that Barack Obama is not only taking orders from the United Nations, but that ultimately, he may run for Secretary General of the corrupt, socialist dictrocracy. As self-destructive as they are dangerous, their latest move, facilitated by all the resources Barack Obama could heap upon them (courtesy the U.S. taxpayer) shouldn&#8217;t be surprising given the honors they&#8217;ve bestowed on thugs in the past.<span id="more-4782"></span></p>
<p>The U.N. General Assembly <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/world/2011/09/16/libyas-united-nations-seat-approved/" target="_blank">voted overwhelmingly</a> to hand what was formerly Libya&#8217;s seat in the world body to the rebels that now control that country. Yes, Libya did have a voice in the international matters of the United Nations. Remember when they invited him to New York to blather on and on? Well, now they&#8217;ve voted the rebels to do the same.</p>
<p>The rebels-or transitional council (whatever they call themselves) are being led by a guy named <a href="http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2011/09/14/rebel_rupture?page=0,<a href="http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2011/09/14/rebel_rupture?page=0,0" target="_blank">Mustafa Abdel Jalil</a>. Don&#8217;t know him? He was the former justice minister under Ghadaffi. You saw that right, an ex Ghadaffi thug is now <i>the head of the rebels.</i> Justice Minister. Of course, we know what kind of justice Ghadaffi exacted on his people, and now the administer himself has maneuvered himself into the graces of the United Nations. Not all the various tribes in Libya are happy with this guy, nor should they be. But just in case things get out of hand in Libya between the various rebel factions, Jalil has created a brutal buffer between himself and the unwashed masses.</p>
<p>Keep in mind that the new head of security for the rebels has <a href="http://haeha.net/2011/09/05/terrific-libyas-new-security-head-admits-to-al-qaeda-ties-human-events/" target="_blank">admitted that he is al-Qaeda</a>. Freeing fellow jihadists from Libyan prisons and shipping looted Libyan weapons to al-Qaeda factions solidify the claim. The very thugs that we are supposedly battling in the war on terrorism, and now not only has Obama installed them as a regime in Libya, but the United Nations has invited them to have a voice in international affairs.</p>
<p>The United States contributes by far more money to the U.N. than any other country. Now al-Qaeda will have a say where that money goes. You can&#8217;t make this up. Currently, it is the Republicans that hold the purse strings to the U.N. What will they do? Don&#8217;t ask John McCain, he thinks the rebels are just great. Luckily he can&#8217;t cut a check to the rebels. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen is the chair of the U.S. House Foreign Affairs Committee. Her committee could recommend a cut off today. Do you think Boehner and golfing buddy Obama would let that happen?</p>
<p>The next president-should Barry be deposed will have more to deal with than just domestic issues. I know, you&#8217;ve heard <i>nothing</i> else from them, but unraveling what Obama has wrought in the Middle East is going to take someone with brains and knowledge of what is actually happening there. Do any of the candidates sound like they fit that bill? Not to me, and maybe that&#8217;s why they&#8217;re getting a pass on anything but the economy in the debates.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sounding the alarm right now. The rebels unfortunately are <i>exactly</i> who they appear to be and it looks like Obama and his handlers at the U.N. are putting them on a pedestal while our troops fight them in two other wars in different parts of the world. Speak up candidates. If you need an advisor, shoot me an e-mail. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rjjrdq.com/2011/09/17/al-qaeda-joins-the-united-nations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Hands Libya to al-Qaeda</title>
		<link>http://rjjrdq.com/2011/07/17/obama-hands-libya-to-al-qaida/</link>
		<comments>http://rjjrdq.com/2011/07/17/obama-hands-libya-to-al-qaida/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 03:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rjjrdq</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[al Qaeda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ghadaffi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjjrdq.com/?p=4596</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>While the bitching and moaning over how much more money we can spend rages in Washington, the United States the Obama regime has given an entire country to the enemies that we are supposedly at war with.</p> <p>Despite the fact that the Libyan rebels are soaked in Hezbollah and al-Qaeda thugs, the administration has [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While the bitching and moaning over how much more money we can spend rages in Washington, the <del datetime="2011-07-18T03:45:36+00:00">United States</del> the Obama regime has given an entire country to the enemies that we are supposedly at war with.</p>
<p>Despite the fact that the Libyan <i>rebels</i> are soaked in Hezbollah and al-Qaeda thugs, the administration has given them <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/middle-east/western-arab-leaders-meet-in-turkey-on-libyas-future/2011/07/15/gIQAZLbjFI_story.html?hpid=z3" target="_blank"><i>full diplomatic recognition</i></a> as the governing authority in Libya. In other words, they have given the country over to terrorists. No, Ghadaffi is no saint. Noone in the Middle East and North Africa is, but the monsters that just received Libya as a gift are even worse.<span id="more-4596"></span></p>
<p>All the Obama regime needed was a <i>promise</i> that these rebels won&#8217;t be even worse than Ghadaffi. That was good enough for Hillary Clinton, one of the highest ranking dhimmis in the world.</p>
<blockquote><p>The rebels’ Transitional National Council “has offered important assurances today, including the promise to pursue a process of democratic reform that is inclusive both geographically and politically,” Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton said in an explanation of the decision to other foreign ministers.</p></blockquote>
<p>We promise, now give us some money. That money is on the way. This decision opens the door for the rebels to get their hands on $30 billion of Libyan assets. Al-Qaeda bank accounts will be ringing all over the world.</p>
<p><a href="/2011/04/01/libyan-rebels-may-be-al-qaida/" target="_blank">I&#8217;ve talked before</a> about how <i>all</i> the rebel fighters may be Hezbollah and al-Qaeda. Yes, all of them.</p>
<p>John Lee Anderson, staff writer for the <i>New Yorker</i> was on the ground in Libya in April, and he said the rebels numbered no more than 1000. He was there and that was his assessment. $30 billion? I questioned then the idea of supporting these goons. It looked to me like all terror, all the time.</p>
<blockquote><p>NATO Supreme Commander Admiral James Stavridis said that there were flickers of al-Qaida in the rebel ranks. Noman Benotman, al-Qaeda affiliate in Libya (although he claims to have renounced them) went even further, saying that there were 1000 jihadists fighting in Libya, including members of al-Qaeda and Hezbollah. Let’s do the math. Anderson says that there are no more than 1000 rebels in the fight. Benotman says that there are 1000 jihadists there right now. If these numbers are accurate, then the entire rebel force is made up of al-Qaeda and Hezbollah jihadists.</p></blockquote>
<p>Yet they are now recognized as the legitimate government in Libya.</p>
<p>Keep in mind that out troops are still in Iraq and Afghanistan. Obama is about to bankroll enough bullets to pile up the bodybags. Where is the so-called counterweight GOP? Troops will die because of this, and on a lesser note, Libya will be no better off. In fact, NATO has warned the <i>rebels</i> to stop whacking civilians. Correct, the same thing Ghadaffi was accused of.</p>
<p>You can&#8217;t replace crap with more crap and expect a different result. Or, you could say you can&#8217;t replace this Islam with that Islam and expect change. Don&#8217;t tell that to Obama though. Remember, he ignored Congress in pursuit of this. I think he planned to recognize the rebels al-Qaida all along. After all, he cleared the way for the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, so this should come as no suprise.</p>
<p>535 members of Congress (with a full house), and nobody has anything to say about this? Obama has handed an oil rich nation to the very thugs that would destroy America. Now they will have an endless supply of financing to do just that. Obama the destroyer-with a little help from his friends. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rjjrdq.com/2011/07/17/obama-hands-libya-to-al-qaida/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama to Hand Afghanistan to Taliban</title>
		<link>http://rjjrdq.com/2011/06/22/obama-to-hand-afghanistan-over-to-taliban/</link>
		<comments>http://rjjrdq.com/2011/06/22/obama-to-hand-afghanistan-over-to-taliban/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 08:55:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rjjrdq</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taliban]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjjrdq.com/?p=4500</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>While the United States scrambles to put out the flames on the domestic front, the guy with the match, Barack Obama has shown us that he can do damage on an international level as well. In order to divert attention to the possible gutting of his corrupt Justice Department, Obama will give a speech [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While the United States scrambles to put out the flames on the domestic front, the guy with the match, Barack Obama has shown us that he can do damage on an international level as well. In order to divert attention to the possible gutting of his corrupt Justice Department, Obama will <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/06/22/us-usa-afghanistan-idUSTRE75L0QD20110622" target="_blank">give a speech</a> today outlining how he will withdraw a portion of the troops that he sent over to Afghanistan. Yeah, great idea on the surface. You haven&#8217;t heard the whole plan.</p>
<p><a href="http://rjjrdq.wordpress.com/2009/03/08/obama-looks-to-surrender-in-afghanistan/" target="_blank">I said last year</a> that Obama was surrendering to the Taliban. It seemed pretty clear from his language then that any peace agreement would include integrating the Taliban back into the Afghan government. He also wanted Iran to help pull off this surrender. Well, well, well.<span id="more-4500"></span></p>
<p>Afghan puppet goon Hamid Karzai confirmed what I already knew last year. The Obama regime is <a href="http://www.dailynews.com/breakingnews/ci_18308925" target="_blank">talking with the Taliban</a>. With rules of engagement so restrictive for our troops that it would be almost impossible to deal a decisive blow anyway, this sets the stage for the Taliban to take control of Afghanistan once again, under the tooteledge of none other than Iran. The State Department is not denying the Karzai allegations. They have no comment at all on the Iran aspect.</p>
<p>Karzai does though. <a href="http://paktribune.com/news/index.shtml?240564" target="_blank">He met with Iran`s Defence Minister</a> Brigadier General Ahmad Vahidi to talk Islam, infidels, and the complete mockery they have made of our military. Don&#8217;t blame it on the military though. Unleash them and this thing would be over. But <i>over</i> to Obama is quite different than it is for us. That&#8217;s just fine with Karzai. He will continue to take <i>literally</i> <a href="http://www.newser.com/story/103727/karzai-iran-us-give-me-bags-of-money.html" target="_blank">bags of money</a> from the United States and cozy up to Iran at the same time. They give him bags of cash as well.</p>
<blockquote><p>Karzai expressed gratitude for Iran`s support of Afghanistan during the past 32 years, and called for the continuation of Tehran`s help in reconstructing the country and strengthening security.</p></blockquote>
<p>So why are our troops there? First it was to destroy al-Qaeda training camps, as if there was no other place on the globe those could pop up. Then it was to get Bin Laden, who allegedly ended up in Pakistan. We still only have Obama&#8217;s word on that. Then  it was <i>security</i> so that the Taliban would not retake the country. Now we&#8217;ve come full circle, and Obama wants to hand the country over the same forces our troops have been fighting for 10 years.</p>
<p>Obama&#8217;s scheme will make the sacrifices our troops made worthless. He sent 30,000 troops over himself, and kept thousands more there as target practive for the Taliban. Now, he doesn&#8217;t want to just leave, he wants to give the country back to the Taliban as if nothing had happened. Karzai is okay with it. So is the Taliban obviously. And Iran is just ecstatic. Pakistan is probably happy too, at least some elements in their government and security forces.</p>
<p>My plan would have worked. Some well placed F-16&#8242;s would have wreaked havoc on the Taliban. Hell, we could have done that forever. Much cheaper than what the last 10 years cost. Instead, Obama will claim a victory for himself by pulling out troops, and a victory for the Taliban who took on the great Satan-and won. With a gigantic helping hand from the White House. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rjjrdq.com/2011/06/22/obama-to-hand-afghanistan-over-to-taliban/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Palestinians to Create Their Own State</title>
		<link>http://rjjrdq.com/2011/05/21/palestinians-to-create-their-own-state/</link>
		<comments>http://rjjrdq.com/2011/05/21/palestinians-to-create-their-own-state/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 May 2011 10:36:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rjjrdq</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hamas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palestinian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjjrdq.com/?p=4410</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The Palestinians, like the Israeli&#8217;s, rejected the Obama peace scheme immediately, albeit for different reasons. For Israel, it was a recipe for war with indefensible borders, and for the Palestinians, it was a call to unnecessarily concede Israel&#8217;s right to exist. No need for any of that. They&#8217;ll just create a state out of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Palestinians, like the Israeli&#8217;s, rejected the Obama <i>peace</i> scheme immediately, albeit for different reasons. For Israel, it was a recipe for war with indefensible borders, and for the Palestinians, it was a call to <i>unnecessarily</i> concede Israel&#8217;s right to exist. No need for any of that. They&#8217;ll just create a state out of thin air, and have the United Nations make it happen.</p>
<p>It was a ridiculous plan. Have Israel revert to pre-1967 borders and attempt to negoatiate a peaceful settlement with the Palestinians. The same Palestinians that <i>freely</i> elected HAMAS to represent them. HAMAS has only one function: The destruction of Israel. It&#8217;s in their charter, that&#8217;s why they were formed, and to this minute, that&#8217;s all they want. That is who the Palestinians chose to lead them.</p>
<p>The Palestinians knew that Israel would reject such a plan, so they&#8217;re going ahead with a plan of their own, a plan that was in place before Obama&#8217;s disastrous foreign policy speech. They plan to petition the United Nations for <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20110521/ap_on_re_mi_ea/ml_israel_palestinians;_ylt=As.NeFfVYOYKyiQFGTwPE9th24cA;_ylu=X3oDMTNodDgwYXZwBGFzc2V0A2FwLzIwMTEwNTIxL21sX2lzcmFlbF9wYWxlc3RpbmlhbnMEY2NvZGUDcmRuYmV0b3AyMDBwb29sBGNwb3MDMTAEcG9zAzEwBHNlYwN5bl90b3Bfc3RvcmllcwRzbGsDcGFsZXN0aW5pYW5z" target="_blank">recognition of a Palestinian state</a>. With the number of anti-Semitic trolls over at the U.N., it is a real possibility. The result would be Palestinians claiming Israeli land as their own, with the backing of the U.N., of which of course, the United States is a member. It&#8217;s not likely that Obama would go along with this plan though. After all, his nose was bloodied from two sides yesterday. That&#8217;s what you get for sticking it where it doesn&#8217;t belong.<span id="more-4410"></span></p>
<p>Keep in mind that the Palestinians don&#8217;t just want Gaza, the West Bank and East Jerusalem, which they had pre-1967, but they want Palestinian <i>refugees</i> to be able to <i>return</i> to other parts of Israel as well. It doesn&#8217;t take spatial intelligence to get the picture of what would happen. Israel would be inundated with Muslims who&#8230;do not recognize their right to exist. Mahmoud Abbas claims that it is he who would be negotiating and deal with Israel, but I don&#8217;t know how he can make that claim with HAMAS controlling Gaza. I would put that in the category of <i>full of crap.</i> HAMAS would never agree to anything where they weren&#8217;t part of the negotiations, and as <del datetime="2011-05-21T10:30:37+00:00">I</del> they said, Israel&#8217;s right to exist is not recognized.</p>
<p>All Obama did yesterday was pour $4 gasoline on an already incendiary situation. Nobody is happy with the proposal, or the fact that a third party suggested it. Another third party, in the form of the U.N. is much more likely to be sympathetic with the Palestinian scheme. Obviously, that isn&#8217;t going to fly with Israel, and you can predict what the results will be. Palestinians claiming Israeli territory with the backing of the U.N. Obama should have addressed that instead of coming up with his own boneheaded plan. Well, actually he did address that. It was more like a lecture on the world stage. We see how that worked out. Now he has the two sides back in the ring, and neither is listening to him.</p>
<p>Michelle says Barry quit smoking. Maybe he should take up the habit again. He&#8217;s going to need something to help him relax after the hornet&#8217;s nest he&#8217;s stirred up.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rjjrdq.com/2011/05/21/palestinians-to-create-their-own-state/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

