<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>rjjrdq&#039;s America II &#187; North American Union</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rjjrdq.com/category/new-world-order/north-american-union/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rjjrdq.com</link>
	<description>Still good, still bad, and still absurd...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 10:59:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Mexican Trucks to Roll In U.S. Next Week</title>
		<link>http://rjjrdq.com/2011/10/20/mexican-trucks-to-roll-in-u-s-next-week/</link>
		<comments>http://rjjrdq.com/2011/10/20/mexican-trucks-to-roll-in-u-s-next-week/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 05:04:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rjjrdq</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[North American Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Duncan Hunter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jimmy Hoffa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NAFTA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Teamsters]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjjrdq.com/?p=4856</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve asked the question before, for all those that support the Obama social justice, open borders, Marxist nightmare. You might love what he&#8217;s doing in a dreamy, ignorant sort of way, but what happens the day he comes for you? The day that you stand to lose as a result? Well, we&#8217;re getting a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve asked the question before, for all those that support the Obama social justice, open borders, Marxist nightmare. You might love what he&#8217;s doing in a dreamy, ignorant sort of way, but what happens the day he comes for you? The day that <i>you</i> stand to lose as a result? Well, we&#8217;re getting a taste of that right now.<span id="more-4856"></span></p>
<p>While union thugs cracked skulls at town hall meetings during the Obamacare <i>debate</i>, and then tormented Wisconsin earlier this year, with a <i>get out of Obamacare free</i> card now in their pockets, they probably never thought Obama would throw <i>them</i> under the bus. But, as Obama tends to do with useful idiots over time, that&#8217;s just what he&#8217;s done.</p>
<p>The ugly head of NAFTA has reared its ugly head once again, and as a result, Mexican trucks are <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/1st-mexican-truck-enter-us-interior-within-days-184747565.html" target="_blank">set to roll</a> on American soil next week. Instead of handing off loads to union truckers at the border, Mexican truckers can now drive their smoking death traps <i>door to door</i>-with whatever their delivery might be. The result will be a loss of American jobs-and a new way for drug traffickers to get their goods into the United States. This caught the attention of Rep. Duncan Hunter (R-Ca), and none other than the Teamsters head thug, Jimmy Hoffa. Yes, the same one that encouraged crowds to <i>take these sons of bitches out</i>, in reference to the tea party, stood along side Hunter, who is as tea party minded as anybody. I put Hunter right up there with Tom Tancredo on border security, and he would have been my second pick after Tancredo in the 2008 Republican primaries. Now Hunter stands side by side with Hoffa, something you wouldn&#8217;t expect to see in this political climate. But Hunter is standing for the sovereignty of America. Hoffa is trying to preserve the Teamsters. In the end though, they were both at the border in an effort to save American jobs.</p>
<p>NAFTA is a &#8220;free trade&#8221; agreement that was signed into law by Bill Clinton, championed by George Bush, and now being put into overdrive by Barack Obama. All without the consent or the voice of the American people. NAFTA has cost thousands of American jobs already, and this move will cost thousands more, with estimates being as high as 100,000.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s just part of the problem. The cartels will use this program to their advantage, shipping in more drugs and <i>human cargo</i> than ever before. The United States couldn&#8217;t-or wouldn&#8217;t stop it before, so what is there now to make us believe they will stop it now on an even bigger scale?</p>
<blockquote><p>Criminal activity has been a problem for years even within the U.S. government&#8217;s strictest trusted carrier programs. Drug trafficking organizations have smuggled tons of drugs inside trucks driven by approved truckers coming from inspected and certified facilities inside Mexico.</p></blockquote>
<p>Not to mention the weapons. Now, <i>Fast and Furious</i> can continue with no oversight at all. Drugs in, weapons out. And who&#8217;s going to stop it? the $40,000 a year inspector at the border that was just either threatened or bought off?</p>
<p>No rhetoric, no political posturing, no <i>xenophobia</i> accusations. Two individuals that are diametrically opposed on almost every issue can agree on this. Mexican trucks rolling into the U.S. is a bad idea. It&#8217;s dangerous, it will cost American jobs, and it will enrich drug cartels who will use the program as their own personal transportation line. Hunter can&#8217;t overturn NAFTA on his own, but he and Peter DeFazio (a Democrat) are sponsoring a bill the would require Congress to continually approve this program to keep it going. Given the unpopular nature of the program, the bill sounds like a good idea.</p>
<p>No, not even the libs can stomach this one. I ask you socialists again: What happens when Obama comes for you? Hate to say I told you so, but I did. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rjjrdq.com/2011/10/20/mexican-trucks-to-roll-in-u-s-next-week/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mexican Citizens to Bypass TSA Screening</title>
		<link>http://rjjrdq.com/2010/12/11/mexican-citizens-to-bypass-tsa-screening/</link>
		<comments>http://rjjrdq.com/2010/12/11/mexican-citizens-to-bypass-tsa-screening/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Dec 2010 06:30:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rjjrdq</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[North American Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amnesty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Janet Napolitano]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjjrdq.com/?p=3833</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The border with Mexico may have already been erased. While American citizens stand in line at the airport waiting to be groped by TSA personnel, Mexican citizens will be able to chuckle and bypass the entire process.</p> <p>Janet Napolitano went down to Mexico and signed an agreement that would allow millions of Mexican citizens [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://rjjrdq.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/flag_north_american_union.jpg"><img src="http://rjjrdq.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/flag_north_american_union-150x150.jpg" alt="" title="flag_north_american_union" width="150" height="150" class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-3840" /></a>The border with Mexico may have already been erased. While American citizens stand in line at the airport waiting to be groped by TSA personnel, Mexican citizens will be able to chuckle and <a href="http://bunkerville.wordpress.com/2010/12/10/trusted-traveler-program-lets-mexicans-skip-airport-security/" target="_blank"><i>bypass</i> the entire process</a>.</p>
<p>Janet Napolitano went down to Mexico and signed an agreement that would allow millions of Mexican citizens to travel to the United States and avoid the TSA gauntlet that American citizens are subjected to. A <i>trusted traveler</i> agreement was signed amid a party-like atmosphere in Mexico City that would, by Mexican estimates, allow up to 84 million Mexicans to freely travel to the United States and avoid the TSA in the process. You saw that number right. According to <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_Mexico" target="_blank"><i>Wikipedia</i></a> the <i>entire</i> population of Mexico last year was 110,201,789. Do the math. Under this scheme, nearly the entire country would be eligible to come to the United States, and would be allowed to bypass the humiliating security measures that most Americans have no choice but to endure.</p>
<p><span id="more-3833"></span></p>
<blockquote><p>A key part of the agreement is a trusted traveler program that allows airline passengers who have undergone rigorous background checks to bypass lengthy screenings at airport checkpoints. They also must provide biometric information – such as fingerprints – that can be encoded onto trusted traveler cards and run through electronic card readers.</p></blockquote>
<p>Rigorous background checks. Keep in mind that Mexico is the country that issues the <i>Matricula Consular Card,</i> identification that easily reproduced with a laptop and <i>PhotoShop</i> software. There is a way for certain Americans to get on a trusted traveler list, but how that is done is anybody&#8217;s guess. You can be sure though, that the Mexican government will educate their citizens on how to get one of these cards, just like they educated them on how to avoid the Border Patrol while crossing illegally into the United States.</p>
<p>Speaking of the border, there was also a <i>letter of intent</i> signed to develop a plan to protect those that cannot get a trusted traveler designation.</p>
<blockquote><p>The Mexican government occasionally has expressed anger at the way illegal immigrants are robbed, beaten or murdered but are given no protection by U.S. law enforcement agents.</p></blockquote>
<p>You saw that right. The Mexican government is angry that the United States isn&#8217;t doing enough to protect the illegal alien while they are being taken advantage of <i>by their own.</i></p>
<p>What Napolitano has done is to all but erase the border. Mexicans will now be able to pour into the United States, and when they get here, many will be <i>here to stay</i>. Pass an anmesty with the support of all the new illegal voters and&#8230;the end of the United States. That isn&#8217;t rhetoric. They <i>signed an agreement.</i></p>
<p>I said before that it was only a matter of time before the border was erased. With this agreement, it looks like that time has arrived. We can talk about the economy, we can talk about jobs, homeland security, the Constitution-whatever, but it will soon be in the context of a North American Union, <i>not</i> the United States as a sole entity. Once again, a front page story, and it is ignored by the media, and Washington alike. While the debate allegedly rages over the DREAM Act, this has occurred. Much much worse than any version of the act Harry Reid came up with.</p>
<p>This agreement will tilt the country <i>permanently</i> to the left. How many years until meltdown? 2? 3? 10? It&#8217;s not a matter of if, but when. The deal has been struck. And with that deal you can expect race based politics to explode, and civil rights cases to clog the court. Remember, the Justice Department will not pursue civil rights injustices against whites. 84 million Mexicans? That&#8217;s <i>different.</i></p>
<p>I don&#8217;t see how we remain the United States much longer. We will look like a European Union type setup, but our union will be with a third world narco state. If the Republicans coming in can&#8217;t reverse this and find a way to get some serious immigration enforcement done, we&#8217;re finished. I don&#8217;t see that happening. In fact, some Republicans actually wanted the DREAM Act to pass. As engineered demographics change the culture, history will be rewritten to suit whoever is in charge. Our grandchildren will have no concept of what the United States once was. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rjjrdq.com/2010/12/11/mexican-citizens-to-bypass-tsa-screening/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mexican Company Tapped to Issue American ID&#8217;s</title>
		<link>http://rjjrdq.com/2010/11/26/mexican-company-tapped-to-issue-american-ids/</link>
		<comments>http://rjjrdq.com/2010/11/26/mexican-company-tapped-to-issue-american-ids/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Nov 2010 10:12:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rjjrdq</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[North American Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[illegal aliens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oakland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SF Mexico Services LLC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjjrdq.com/?p=3732</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>These ID cards are not meant for American citizens, these are for their own. With Barack Obama in Washington and a Democrat clean sweep in the latest state elections, Califonia has now become a ASINO, American state in name only. We have moved from fighting to preserve the integrity of our union to having [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These ID cards are not meant for American citizens, these are for <i>their own.</i> With Barack Obama in Washington and a Democrat clean sweep in the latest state elections, Califonia has now become a ASINO, American state in name only. We have moved from fighting to preserve the integrity of our union to having to take it back.</p>
<p>Following the lead of Nancy Pelosi&#8217;s San Francisco, the city of <a href="http://www.insidebayarea.com/oaklandtribune/localnews/ci_16694568" target="_blank">Oakland has approved a city ID card</a> that will allow the user to not only be able to present it as valid ID in that city, but will also be able to use it as a debit card in case they cannot open a bank account of their own. <a href="http://www.transfercel.com/" target="_blank">SF Mexico Services LLC</a>, a Mexican company, will be issuing these cards <i>at no charge to the city.</i> According to the company, they aren&#8217;t in it for the money.<span id="more-3732"></span></p>
<p>The company expects to issue about 30,000 cards a year. According to <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oakland,_California" target="_blank">Wikipedia</a>, Oakland is the 41st-largest city in the USA with a population of 446,901. If this company is issuing 30,000 ID&#8217;s a year-do the math. Do you think there are that many people in the city without ID? As city officials gushed at their treasonous act, the real reasons they did this started to leak out. City Council member Ignacio De La Fuente was pretty clear.<!--more--></p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;We have to provide some way for people to identify themselves so that people don&#8217;t get arrested. &#8220;&#8230;</p></blockquote>
<p>Just to add insult to injury, if you thought groups like ACORN were no more, guess again.</p>
<blockquote><p>The company will set up the infrastructure with community-based organizations to accept and process applications and issue the cards, as well as establish the banking relationship to support the cards.</p></blockquote>
<p>In order to get one of these cards, all you need is a driver&#8217;s license, passport, green card or consular card. That&#8217;s right a <i>Matricula Consular</i> Card, that can be easily duplicated by anybody. In fact, I can go downtown and get one for <i>myself</i> today. Apparently, not all illegal aliens have the brains to do something like that, and that&#8217;s what started the push for the bogus ID&#8217;s in San Francisco. Immigration raids in San Francisco years ago (it would have to been long ago) led to deportations for those that had no valid ID in that city. <i>They got it now.</i></p>
<p>A spokesman for the company made it even more clear.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;It&#8217;s in the absolute best interest of all Oakland residents, regardless of immigration status, that everyone has identification,&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>And that&#8217;s the crux, the real reason behind all this. It is identification and banking services for illegal aliens, and it <i>must be honored</i> in the city. Illegal aliens will have <i>valid</i> ID and will have no fear of being arrested and deported as a result. This is aiding and abetting criminals. Jerry Brown is still the Attorney General and could put a stop to this. Of course he won&#8217;t. Incoming AG Kamala Harris is from San Francisco and has absentee illegal alien votes to thank for her victory this month. No, she won&#8217;t do anything either. We can expect drivers licenses for illegals in the coming months. Those that cannot drive will have to settle for the city ID&#8217;s. The rest will be free to do <i>business</i> in your town with a license valid in all 49 states.</p>
<p>You can be sure that SF Mexico Services LLC, which is no doubt an arm of the Mexican government will be turning its sights on Los Angeles, San Diego and Sacramento. With a more than accommodating state government, they should have no trouble setting up shop in those cities as well. Where they go from there is anybody&#8217;s guess.</p>
<p>These illegal aliens-whoever they are, have safe haven in Oakland and when amnesty comes down the pike they can just pop up and claim the prize. We have lost a state in the union. The unthinkable has happened. California caters to a foreign country against the laws of the land, and American taxpayers are footing the bill for it. The costs of illegal immigration are staggering and are especially extreme in California. Look for that to get even worse with this brazen flouting of immigration law.</p>
<p>Will Republicans address this issue in January? This is an <i>entire state</I> being handed to Mexico. Or will they focus on tax cuts for the rich and belt tightening-important things yes, but even to fail in those efforts, we would still have 50 states at the end of the day. That is not the case here. Canada is balkanized with their French Quebec, but they aren&#8217;t third world. I hear Quebec is quite nice actually. We would have <i>Mexico D.F.</i> complete with drug gangs, government corruption and third world poverty, all of it illegally rammed down our throats. The Justice Department needs to come after California, not Arizona. A few more years of Obama and there may not be a California to go after though. There is the very real option of secession, although the loss of federal funds would make that unlikely. Of course, I though America losing a state without a shot being fired was unlikely too. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rjjrdq.com/2010/11/26/mexican-company-tapped-to-issue-american-ids/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mexico Building Border Wall</title>
		<link>http://rjjrdq.com/2010/11/22/mexico-building-border-wall/</link>
		<comments>http://rjjrdq.com/2010/11/22/mexico-building-border-wall/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2010 09:51:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rjjrdq</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[North American Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[border]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guatemala]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjjrdq.com/?p=3704</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>You heard that right. The same country that chastised the United States for considering such a thing is now doing what they claim to be a violation of basic human rights. Remember though, Congress gutted funding for an effective border fence, and what we have on the border is little more than a joke. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://my.opera.com/cwbywz/blog/president-gives-the-go-ahead-for-building-the-fence-on-southern-border" target="_blank"><img src="http://rjjrdq.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/border-150x150.jpg" alt="" title="border" width="150" height="150" class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-3707" /></a>You heard that right. The same country that chastised the United States for <i>considering</i> such a thing is now doing what they claim to be a violation of basic human rights. Remember though, Congress gutted funding for an effective border fence, and what we have on the border is little more than a joke. What Mexico is building though, will be no joke at all.</p>
<p>In case you thought Mexico had a change of heart about its citizens streaming into the United States unchecked, guess again. <a href="http://www.examiner.com/immigration-reform-in-national/hypocritical-mexico-is-now-building-their-own-wall-on-border-with-guatemala-press-ignores" target="_blank">Their wall will be on the <i>Southern border</i></a> to keep out the Guatemalans. It&#8217;s estimated that 500,000 Guatamalans cross illegally every year, most destined for the United States, but some remaining in Mexico. According to Raul Diaz, head goon of the <i>Mexican Superintendency of Tax Administration</i>, the aim is to stop contraband from being illegally shipped into Mexico from Guatamala. He concedes though that it will work just great to keep illegal aliens out as well.<span id="more-3704"></span></p>
<blockquote><p>The official reason is to stop contraband from coming into Mexico, but as Diaz admitted: “It could also prevent the free passage of illegal immigrants.”</p></blockquote>
<p><i>It could,</i> huh? It will. Mexico knows how effective a border wall can be, and that&#8217;s why they are so upset about the idea of the United States securing its own borders with one. Blocking the Southern border would ensure that the flow of illegal aliens into the United States would be almost exclusively from Mexico. I&#8217;ve talked about the <i>North American Union</i> before. The United States, Mexico and Canada joined as one. Mexico is actively seeking to make that a reality.</p>
<p>So we have amnesty and the resulting chain migration on the docket in Washington, deportation cases being dismissed by <i>the thousands</i>, the feds challenging any kind of immigration laws proposed by states, sanctuary cities abounding, and now Mexico sealing off their Southern border to make sure any amnesty bill will become <i>Mexican amnesty.</i> Do you think that&#8217;s rhetoric? It&#8217;s happening <i>as we speak.</i></p>
<p>We need a wall <i>now,</i> we need troops on the border (and I&#8217;m not talking about unarmed National Guardsman stringing barbed wire), we need E-Verify, we need workplace enforcement, and we need the Justice Department investigated for their handling of states like Arizona who saw all this a mile away. We&#8217;ve heard about the DREAM Act from the Democrats, but so far, we&#8217;ve heard nothing from the Republicans, save a <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/11/20/dream-act-allow-illegals-criminal-records-gain-residency-gop-says/" target="_blank">common sense analysis by Jeff Sessions</a> and <a href="/2010/11/20/scott-brown-selling-out/" target="-blank">Scott Brown talking about</a> how he actually wants to work with that crowd on immigration reform.</p>
<p>Well, I just outlined reform. If it&#8217;s good enough for Mexico, it&#8217;s certainly good enough for the United States. No longer does Mexico have a legitimate gripe about any kind of border wall (as if they ever had one). To make bad even worse though, the Dems still have that huge majority until January. They can conceivably shove through the DREAM Act with no help from Republicans <i>at all.</i> Now that the elections are over, the Democrats that survived the bloodbath earlier in the month are much less likely to listen to the American people now. They have at least a few more years to divert their attention from what they are considering. Another front page story buried by the media.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rjjrdq.com/2010/11/22/mexico-building-border-wall/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama, Mexican Cartels Defacto Partners</title>
		<link>http://rjjrdq.com/2010/04/05/obama-mexican-cartels-defacto-partners/</link>
		<comments>http://rjjrdq.com/2010/04/05/obama-mexican-cartels-defacto-partners/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 03:10:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rjjrdq</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[North American Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amnesty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[border]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cartels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[El Porvenir]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjjrdq.com/?p=2820</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>This couldn&#8217;t have worked out better for Barack Obama if he had planned this himself. Then again, he may have done just that.</p> <p>With the Southern border of the United States wide open , the drug cartels in Mexico are engaged in a bloody war for control of the drug routes into the country. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This couldn&#8217;t have worked out better for Barack Obama if he had planned this himself. Then again, he may have done just that.</p>
<p>With the Southern border of the United States wide open , the drug cartels in Mexico are engaged in a bloody war for control of the drug routes into the country. In fact, the borders are so wide open, that the most effective barrier to the flood of illegal aliens from Mexico is the gauntlet of cartel violence they have to traverse to get here. <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/us/2010/04/01/mexicans-facing-drug-war-violence-seek-political-asylum/" target="_blank">A new tactic</a> by the cartels may now make that trip worth the risk.</p>
<p>El Porvenir, Mexico, a town of 10,000 just across the border is being cleaned out by one of the cartels. They have given residents one month to pack up and get out. It&#8217;s not clear why they want the entire town to themselves, but what is clear is <i>that they do want it.</i> This has caused a stream of Mexican citizens to flock to Texas and either legally or illegally escape into the United States. It has also caused a new phenomenon that could have far reaching implications. There are those that are now claiming <i>political asylum.</i> That&#8217;s right. Fearing violence, or in this case certain death from the cartels have driven some to claim political aslyum in the United States. Yes, the original intent of political asylum was to offer citizens of other countries protection from their own governments, but that has now morphed into a threat of any kind, in this case, coming from the cartels. There is now talk of tent cities being set up in case of a major run to the border by the residents of El Porvenir. This couldn&#8217;t have worked out better for Barack Obama. With his popularity in free-fall, and fresh over an enraging health care mess rammed down the throat of America, his amnesty agenda faces maybe even more fierce opposition than his socialized health care bill did. Handing political asylum to anybody that claims the threat of violence in Mexico would be defacto amnesty, because the fact is, that once they&#8217;re here, they will not be going back. Potentially, millions of Mexican citizens could make the claim that cartel violence was imminent and needed political asylum. The problem is that this was never the intention of political asylum. Mexico is a narco-state, and many countries in the hemisphere have citizens that could make the same claim as those in El Porvenir. Where does it stop? where do you draw the line?</p>
<p>This is a direct result of not enforcing border security. Those cartels are fighting over drug routes. If there were no drug routes this would not be occurring. Instead, the Obama regime is facilitating not only this drug war, but the resulting displacement-into the United States of Mexican citizens. Let&#8217;s be fair. George Bush was no border sentry either. Obama is just continuing the march to erase the border and turn Mexico, Canada and the United states into one country. Bush actually got that ball rolling. Makes you wonder who is actually in charge&#8230; But Obama could stop it today. Build the double fencing, put the military on the border, and effectively cut off the source of contention between drug cartels. They would have to peddle their wares somewhere else. And they would, it just wouldn&#8217;t be a hop, skip and a jump across the border.</p>
<p>It remains to be seen how the whole political asylum situation plays out. We already know that the borders will remain wide open, and internal enforcement will be virtually non-existent. Ramming through amnesty after potentially hundreds of thousands of asylum seekers are safely in the United States would be an Obama dream. Of course that was a Bush dream as well. Again, it makes you wonder who&#8217;s really in charge. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rjjrdq.com/2010/04/05/obama-mexican-cartels-defacto-partners/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Napolitano Admits Border Security Is A Fraud</title>
		<link>http://rjjrdq.com/2010/03/18/napolitano-admits-border-security-is-a-fraud/</link>
		<comments>http://rjjrdq.com/2010/03/18/napolitano-admits-border-security-is-a-fraud/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 02:53:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rjjrdq</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[North American Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amnesty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boeing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homeland Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Janet Napolitano]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SBInet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjjrdq.com/?p=2771</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Well this dovetail&#8217;s just perfectly with Obamacare coming down the pike and the upcoming amnesty push. Confirming what everyone already knew, the Mexican border is, and has been wide open.</p> <p>When congress mandated a border fence few years back, a response to the cries of angry Americans who not only throttled the McCain/Kennedy amnesty [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well this dovetail&#8217;s just perfectly with Obamacare coming down the pike and the upcoming amnesty push. Confirming what everyone already knew, the Mexican border is, and has been <i>wide open</i>.</p>
<p>When congress mandated a border fence  few years back, a response to the cries of angry Americans who not only throttled the McCain/Kennedy amnesty bill, but demanded border security in a manner that a superpower like the United States could provide, the idea was clear. Double layer fencing and patrols that would make the fence virtually inpenetrable. Instead, we got single layer fencing that is being dismantled from the Mexican side for scrap, and <i>virtual fencing</i>, electronic surveillance that was useless in theory and even more useless in practice.</p>
<p> The virtual boondoggle, a plan called SBInet, is a scheme for cameras and sensors along the border, to be provided by Boeing. Yes, the same Boeing that rakes in billions in defense contracts, were tapped to come up with this waste of time. And waste of time is was. Finally, Homeland Security head goon Janet Napolitano (speaking of waste of time) <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0310/34528.html" target="_blank">has scrapped the SBInet</a>, citing cost overruns missed deadlines. She forgot to mention that half the junk that was installed didn&#8217;t work. She&#8217;s witholding millions in stimulus funds which will effectively kill the project. That won&#8217;t do <i>anything</i> about the money already spent.</p>
<p>Excuse me. Are we to believe that Boeing, the makers of jet airplanes, the architects of cutting edge military technology, <i>can&#8217;t install a freakin&#8217; camera?</i> The guy at the 7-11 put his in just fine. But Boeing just can&#8217;t figure out how to do it. We&#8217;ve been had once again. Assuming this thing worked as advertised, in the end it is just virtual fencing. In other words, all we could do is watch the people coming across, but we couldn&#8217;t do anything about it. Why not? Obama has <a href="/2010/02/20/mexican-law-enforcement-integrated-into-border-patrol/" target="_blank">integrated Mexico with the border patrol</a>. The Mexican government itself had indicated they have no intention of securing the border. We know that the border patrol has also been infiltrated with drug cartels. Honest border agents are looking at prison for possibly violating civil rights of illegal aliens. There are enough rules and blocks to make the jobs of those agents nearly impossible anyway. Not only that, these guys now not only have to watch out for what is coming at them, but they have to watch their backs as well. With a corrupt Mexico intertwined in the border patrol, you <i>just can&#8217;t tell</i> who the good guy is anymore.</p>
<p>That border is wide open, despite the <a href="/2009/05/30/chuck-schumer-claims-border-fence-almost-done/" target="_blank">flat out lies</a> you hear from open border zealots in Washington. They&#8217;ll be using that same lie when the amnesty push comes, and with health care winding down&#8230;one way or another, the way will be clear for a full out amnesty attack. And yes, they&#8217;ll use that same at least decade old estimate of 10-12 million illegals. That just can&#8217;t be possible.</p>
<p>Amnesty, a total takeover of health care, and a rigged census will not only turn this country <i>permanently</i> to the left, but will create a 3rd world nightmare, with political power in the hands of those that only know the 3rd world mindset. I&#8217;ve said before that immigration dwarfs all other issues, because it affects all other issues. We are more integrated with Mexico than you think, and I&#8217;ve said before that at a certain point the problem cannot be solved. The numbers would be too huge. Take California for instance. Explosive immigrant birth rates-and most needing those entitlement programs the taxpayer provides will turn California into a Mexican state within 20 years. With amnesty, it will be more like 20 minutes.   </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rjjrdq.com/2010/03/18/napolitano-admits-border-security-is-a-fraud/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mexican Law Enforcement Integrated Into Border Patrol</title>
		<link>http://rjjrdq.com/2010/02/20/mexican-law-enforcement-integrated-into-border-patrol/</link>
		<comments>http://rjjrdq.com/2010/02/20/mexican-law-enforcement-integrated-into-border-patrol/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 02:09:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rjjrdq</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[North American Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amnesty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Border Patrol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[illegal aliens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Janet Napolitano]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjjrdq.com/?p=2661</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>One more front page story buried in cyberspace. If you thought the borders weren&#8217;t secure before, then have a seat because this this will make you dizzy. With a half-assed incomplete fence at the border, pandering RINO&#8217;s abound, amnesty on docket for the Obama social justice regime, reconquistas in full attack mode, and Homeland [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One more front page story buried in cyberspace. If you thought the borders weren&#8217;t secure before, then have a seat because this this will make you dizzy. With a half-assed incomplete fence at the border, pandering RINO&#8217;s abound, amnesty on docket for the Obama <i>social justice</i> regime, reconquistas in full attack mode, and Homeland Security now a macabre joke, this latest scheme not only obliterates the border, but will actually enable the futher Northward flow of drugs, guns, gangsters, and illegal aliens.</p>
<p>Compliments of Janet Napolitano, the Muslim terrorist loving nitwit at Homeland Security, a deal has been penned with the Mexican goverment to <a href="<br />
http://www.latimes.com/news/nation-and-world/la-na-border18-2010feb18,0,4941697.story?page=1" target="_blank">fuse the Border Patrol with Mexican law enforcement</a> to ostensibly interdict the flow of guns and narcotics across the the U.S./Mexican border. Mexican law enforcement personnel will train with, and <i>have access to</i> Border Patrol intelligence in order to battle the drug gang war at the border. Some Mexican agents will be stationed in the U.S., and vice-versa. That&#8217;s right, these Mexican <i>agents</i> will be freely moving back and forth across the border, all in the name of <i>law enforcement.</I> Since many of these agents will be operating on American soil, it isn&#8217;t clear what authority they will have regarding American citizens. In theory they should have <i>no authority.</i> In theory. We know that Barack Obama signed and executive order giving Interpol free reign in the United States, and dominion over American citizens. What has he done here?</p>
<p>For the sake of brevity, let&#8217;s narrow in on just <i>some</i> of the potential problems with this partnership. The problem is that Mexican law enforcement has a long history of corruption. Hardly a week goes by that there isn&#8217;t another story out of Mexico where entire police forces, or entire army units turn out to be goons for the drug cartels. Now some of these same goons will be joined at the hip with U.S. Border Patrol, and have access to where they will be, when they will be there, and what kind of firepower they will have available. Not only that, they will have access to whatever intelligence the Border Patrol might have on specific drug gang targets. All that information in theory could end up in hands of the drug cartels before they even make a move. I say in theory, but in Mexico, <i>it&#8217;s not a theory.</i> Even if these Mexican agents have the best intentions as far as stopping the cartels&#8217; activities, they <i>are not</i> inclined to stop illegal aliens from crossing the border. In fact, they may be providing a safe route in an otherwise dangerous border war zone.</p>
<blockquote><p>However, Trevino said that while his officers aggressively pursue smugglers, they do not intend to interfere with Mexicans crossing north illegally if there is no evidence of other criminal activity. The policy is dictated by longtime Mexican political sensitivity and public opinion, experts say.</p></blockquote>
<p><i>Political sensitivity.</i> What the hell does that mean? So what kind of dilemma do you think this will present when a joint Border Patrol/Mexican law enforcement contingent stumbles across a gaggle of illegal aliens? You can just guess. With Napolitano cracking down on ICE agents, and sheriffs like Joe Arpaio in the United States, you have to believe that the order has gone out to leave the illegal border crossers alone. Former border agents Ramos and Campeon can tell you what will happen if they are not left alone. After all, Napolitano has already stated that crossing the border illegally is not illegal. <i>Go look up the statement.</i><br /><BR>So what is the point here? It could be that Barack Obama wants to give the appearance that they really are cracking down at the border, but in fact, they are just exacerbating the problem. They can still come up with some numbers though that may give the appearance that they&#8217;re doing something. A drug bust here, an arrest there, but that has <i>always</i> been going on. That was never an indication that the border was secure, and this latest scheme will guarantee that border is not only insecure, but logistically in the hands of drug cartels on the one hand, and the the Mexican goverment on the other hand, who actually want their citizens to leave Mexico. They want their citizens to go to the United States and send back remittances to Mexico. I wonder how effective this new plan will be for those trying <i>to return to Mexico.</i> I wonder.</p>
<p>And the line at the border, if not completely gone, is so blurred that it cannot be recognized. We can talk about border security, amnesty, this and that, but at a certain point, the things <i>they are doing now</i> will cause a tipping point where there will be a point of no return. How many people with allegiance to another country can be allowed into another country before there are no longer two countries? They aren&#8217;t going to tell us the answer, <i>they&#8217;re going to show us.</i>   </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rjjrdq.com/2010/02/20/mexican-law-enforcement-integrated-into-border-patrol/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Geraldo Rivera Race Baiting In Overdrive</title>
		<link>http://rjjrdq.com/2009/11/26/geraldo-rivera-race-baiting-in-overdrive/</link>
		<comments>http://rjjrdq.com/2009/11/26/geraldo-rivera-race-baiting-in-overdrive/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 08:40:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rjjrdq</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North American Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amnesty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geraldo Rivera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjjrdq.com/?p=2042</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Once again, hispanics are slapped across the face by those that supposedly advocate for them. The push for amnesty is on, and at the same time, two countries face devastation as a result.</p> <p>Amnesty stooge Geraldo Rivera was at it again, this time advocating border demolition at the U.S.-Mexico Congressional Border Issues Conference, a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once again, hispanics are slapped across the face by those that supposedly advocate for them. The push for amnesty is on, and at the same time, two countries face devastation as a result.</p>
<p>Amnesty stooge <a href="http://cnsnews.com/news/article/45316" target="_blank">Geraldo Rivera was at it again</a>, this time advocating border demolition at the U.S.-Mexico Congressional Border Issues Conference, a reconquista, socialist, race baiting party that has only one solution for the problems that Mexico faces: amnesty. At the conference, Rivera tacitly admitted that amnesty would be devastating to America. He said that the hispanic community should give Barack Obama <i>a little slack</i> in dealing with the <del datetime="2009-11-26T08:26:57+00:00">path to citizenship</del> amnesty issue. What does <i>hispanic community</i> mean? Do latinos think as a mob Geraldo? Or do you just tell them what to think? He cited other issues such as the economy and the health care debacle. I agree Geraldo. Throw amnesty on top of that mess and it can only spell disaster.</p>
<p>That isn&#8217;t really what he meant though. He just means that the president is preoccupied right now, but he <i>will</i> get to amnesty. He did mention things that Obama could do right now though. How about stopping ICE raids? <i>I thought they already did that Geraldo?</i> In fact, the most successful sheriff in rounding up illegals, Joe Arpaio of Arizona, is <i>the only sheriff</i> in the country that <a href="http://cnsnews.com/news/article/55966" target="_blank"><i>is not</i> authorized</a> to operate task forces that can enforce federal immigration laws under the 287g program. They hear you loud and clear, Geraldo. He also said ICE must be redirected to the mandate that Congress established for ICE in the wake of the 9/11 attacks. Oh? What about the double layer fence that had the funding gutted? That must have slipped this idiot&#8217;s mind.</p>
<p>What amnesty conference would be complete without the obligatory race baiting. According to Geraldo, when asked how the media could get on board with the amnesty push (I thought they already were), Geraldo pulled the race card.</p>
<blockquote><p>When asked by a participant at the event what could be done to get the media to support comprehensive immigration reform, Rivera said people who are against it have a “truly hateful, deep sentiment” and a “deep nativist thing.”</p></blockquote>
<p>Yep, you&#8217;re either for amnesty, or you&#8217;re a racist. A nativist even. This buffoon is pulling out all the stops. He knows that once the 2010 elections roll around, this issue dies like it did a few years ago. Obama knows it too. Get ready, because here it comes, and you can expect the same bi-partisanship that you got with the health care debate. Once again, open borders advocates will denigrate Mexican citizens (this is all about Mexico and the North American Union, who are we kidding) by suggesting that Mexicans cannot govern themselves, they don&#8217;t have the intellectual capacity to run a country and the only alternative is to go to the United States, where the citizens can be taxed into oblivion to fund the freebies that await them. Well, Geraldo you jackass, if you continue to beat that message into the Mexican people, at a certain point <i>it will become the truth.</I> Is that what you want? To take the youngest and strongest of Mexican society and dump them into the United States <i>as is</i> with the message they just aren&#8217;t good enough? That is a recipe of destruction for not one, but two countries. Geraldo and his pals are blinded by race and just can&#8217;t see it.   </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rjjrdq.com/2009/11/26/geraldo-rivera-race-baiting-in-overdrive/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cultural Racism Part Of The Amnesty Package</title>
		<link>http://rjjrdq.com/2009/11/14/cultural-racism-part-of-the-amnesty-package/</link>
		<comments>http://rjjrdq.com/2009/11/14/cultural-racism-part-of-the-amnesty-package/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 05:51:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rjjrdq</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North American Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amnesty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Memin Pinguin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[racism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vicente Fox]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjjrdq.com/?p=1951</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>For all you hopey-changey bots that want to back Barack Obama in his amnesty bid, you should understand that those &#8220;good folks that just want to work&#8221; will be bringing with them a culture that is ingrained with racism.</p> <p>Remember a few years back when Mexico came up with postage stamps commemorating one of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.the-two-malcontents.com/2008/07/08/mexican-comic-character-draws-charges-of-racism/"><img src="http://rjjrdq.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/memin-pinguin-150x150.jpg" alt="memin-pinguin" title="memin-pinguin" width="150" height="150" class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-1953" /></a>For all you <i>hopey-changey</i> bots that want to back Barack Obama in his amnesty bid, you should understand that those &#8220;good folks that just want to work&#8221; will be bringing with them a culture that is ingrained with racism.</p>
<p>Remember a few years back when Mexico came up with postage stamps commemorating one of that country&#8217;s comic book characters Memín Pinguín? At the time there was an uproar in United States regarding the stereotypical depiction of blacks in the character. Take a look at that picture. I thought it was a <i>monkey</i> too, but it isn&#8217;t, it is supposed to be a little black boy. The Mexican president at the time, open borders advocate Vicente Fox, defended the release of stamps, citing Memin Pinguin as <i>a beloved character</i> in Mexican culture. Finally, after howls of outrage from the North, and even a visit from ethno-hustlers Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson, Fox had the stamps removed from circulation. He only did it under pressure though. To this day, Fox sees nothing wrong with the depiction.<span id="more-1951"></span></p>
<p>Of course not. That&#8217;s how he was raised. He can&#8217;t see anything wrong with the depiction, because for him, <i>there is nothing wrong</i>. Remember his comment, <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,156730,00.html" target="_blank">Mexicans will do the work <i>not even blacks will do</i>.&#8221;</a> Not even those blacks. That raised some eyebrows here as well, but not in Mexico. Black people are what they are to him, and apparently, to many in Mexican culture. Are what they are? And what would that be, you say?</p>
<p>Fast forward to today, where a popular Mexican television show, <i>Cero En Conducta</i> currently runs on one of the Spanish language stations that is broadcast here in the United States. The set is supposed to be an elementary school, although all the actors are adults. A recent episode on a new student joining the class showed just how ingrained racism is in that culture. <a href="http://www.diggersrealm.com/mt/archives/003271.html" target="_blank">Check the link</a> if you want to see this. I didn&#8217;t watch the entire thing. I didn&#8217;t have to. A scene starts off with a guy dragging the black &#8220;kid&#8221; into the class. He exclaims &#8220;I found Jorge playing in the mud,&#8221; or something to that effect. When the teacher, who continually beats students with a stick throughout the program says that the kid isn&#8217;t Jorge, the guys tells her that he thought is was, and that he had just been covered in black roofing tar. Enter the canned laughter. The scene goes on, and the teacher mentions that he is from Africa. Monkey jokes, hurling of bananas, and other racist activity draw howls of canned laughter. It went on and on. Again, I didn&#8217;t need to see it all.</p>
<p>If you looked at the video, tell me what would happen if a show like that were broadcast in English. There would be riots in the streets-blood in the streets. Even on an academic level, what self-respecting black man or woman would take anything like that? Yet in Spanish, there has been no fallout whatsoever. Has no one seen this? Where is Jackson? Sharpton? Wright? Obama even? While the Hispanic caucus claws at Obama and demands amnesty, he should realize what this group thinks of him as a man, as a human being. Look at that Memin Pinguin again. That&#8217;s what they think. A stupid, lower form of life stooge that will give away the country to racist reconquistas. I&#8217;m not saying that there aren&#8217;t good people in Mexico. Not at all. What I&#8217;m saying is that this is a cultural issue, and after the struggles the United States has had over the years with racism and civil rights, it would be a shame at the very least to to erase so much blood, sweat, and tears with a swipe of the pen. It would be a lot more than a shame to those that were in the trenches turning this country in the right direction. Is this how Barack Obama will return the favor to 98% of the black voters casting for him? Looks that way.    </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rjjrdq.com/2009/11/14/cultural-racism-part-of-the-amnesty-package/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Amnesty Next On The Obama Agenda</title>
		<link>http://rjjrdq.com/2009/11/14/amnesty-next-on-the-obama-agenda/</link>
		<comments>http://rjjrdq.com/2009/11/14/amnesty-next-on-the-obama-agenda/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 22:34:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North American Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amnesty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homeland Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Janet Napolitano]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjjrdq.com/?p=1944</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>With a failed stimulus plan, unemployment in double digits (and those are just the ones they&#8217;re still counting), a crippling cap and trade tax plan, a disastrous and unaffordable health care takeover looming, and a skyrocketing national debt, the Obama regime has decided that this is the perfect time to introduce amnesty.</p> <p>Homeland hack [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With a failed <i>stimulus plan</i>, unemployment in double digits (and those are just the ones they&#8217;re still counting), a crippling cap and trade tax plan, a disastrous and unaffordable health care takeover looming, and a skyrocketing national debt, the Obama regime has decided that this is the perfect time to introduce <i>amnesty</i>.</p>
<p>Homeland hack freak <a href="http://www.dhs.gov/ynews/speeches/sp_1258123461050.shtm" target="_blank">Janet Napolitano reintroduced the plan during a speech</a> to the radical <i>think tank</i>, Center for American Progress. Her lies, obfuscations, and contradictions would have been amusing if not for the possible ramifications. Lie #1: She is still using that <i>12 million</i> number of illegals. I&#8217;ve pointed this out before: That&#8217;s the same number that <i>W</i> was using in his <i>first term.</i> Is she saying nobody has crossed since at least 2000? Not even Napolitano would dispute that, even though she obviously has no problem contradicting herself in the next sentence. We know that Bear Stearns put the number at closer to 20 million (which I think may be a low ball number as well), but Napolitano/Obama don&#8217;t want to stop there. In her speech she talks about improved legal flows for immigrants <i>and their families.</i> Their families? Now how many people are we talking about?<span id="more-1944"></span></p>
<p>She self congratulates herself on the improvement of border security, and the fencing that has gone up since 2006. Well, the fence is not done, and in fact, what was originally envisioned never materialized. Not only have illegal aliens, which included violent gang members, drug smugglers, human smugglers, and <i>terrorists</i> (yes, remember them?) just moved to unbordered areas to cross, the fence that in place is little more than a joke. What happened to the double fencing that was supposed to go up? Gutted by Congress. So now we have single fencing, vehicle barriers that anyone can just walk past, and virtual fencing, that may or may not work. Even when the technology is working, there may not be any Border Patrol to move in and make any arrests. If they do move in, <a href="http://rjjrdq.wordpress.com/2008/11/15/border-patrol-agents-continue-to-rot-in-prison/" target="_blank">Ramos and Campeon</a> can tell what  they may be facing. As for the &#8220;fencing&#8221;, we now know that it is starting to be <a href="http://www.apbweb.com/featured-articles/1346-border-fence-recycling.html" target="_blank">dismantled on the Mexican side for scrap metal</a>. That&#8217;s right, they&#8217;re tearing it down as we speak. If that isn&#8217;t enough to steam you, some of the border fence was <a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=6626823" target="_blank">built by the very illegal aliens is was designed to keep out</a>. That&#8217;s right, companies contracted to build the fence had illegal aliens doing the job <i>that Americans won&#8217;t do.</i> Are you telling me they can&#8217;t find Americans to build the border fence?</p>
<p>Napolitano also mentions that they have reduced the back log of immigrations background checks. They haven&#8217;t <i>ever</i> been able to do this. How did they pull it off so fast. <i>Use your imagination.</i> She also mentions that they are encouraging businesses to use E-Verify. Why doesn&#8217;t she <i>demand it</i>? Why does she ignore santuary cities? Why does she prevent her own DHS agent from conducting raids? Why did she strip <a href="/2009/08/homeland-security-trying-to-shut-down-joe-arpaio/" target="_blank">Sheriff Joe Arpaio</a> of federal authority to make arrests? She&#8217;s even looking to reduce penalties for those that cross illegally. Remember, it was Napolitano that said that crossing the border wasn&#8217;t a crime. That is how she really feels.</p>
<blockquote><p>Moreover, some current laws covering immigration-related fraud have to be brought more in line with common sense. Right now, a corrupt immigration attorney who facilitates hundreds of immigration violations by knowingly helping aliens fraudulently seek asylum or permanent residence is treated almost the same as an alien who buys a single fake green card.</p></blockquote>
<p>What is she saying there? Lessen the penalties for illegal aliens. Yes, there is need for reform. Yes, the system is broken. I just outlined why it&#8217;s broken. Current laws are not being enforced. Amnesty doesn&#8217;t fix the problem. In fact it will make it worse by encouraging further illegal immigration. We can&#8217;t afford an influx of people from a failed state down South. We don&#8217;t have the money. We are out of money. Erasing a border and opening the door to a failed narco state that boasts a population of over 100 million would be a disaster that would dwarf cap and trade and health care. This is bigger folks. This will change the face of America with a swipe of a pen. Broke, sagging infrastructure, skyrocketing unemployment, a bleak job market, outsourcing (no that never stopped folks), and a collapsing dollar on the world market are not the conditions that facilitate amnesty. Do you still have a doubt as to what Obama wants to do this country?  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rjjrdq.com/2009/11/14/amnesty-next-on-the-obama-agenda/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

