<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>rjjrdq&#039;s America II &#187; Socialist</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rjjrdq.com/category/new-world-order/socialist/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rjjrdq.com</link>
	<description>Still good, still bad, and still absurd...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 05:25:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Global Warming Fraudsters Grasping At Straws</title>
		<link>http://rjjrdq.com/2012/04/16/global-warming-fraudsters-grasping-at-straws/</link>
		<comments>http://rjjrdq.com/2012/04/16/global-warming-fraudsters-grasping-at-straws/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 03:56:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rjjrdq</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Socialist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global warming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjjrdq.com/?p=5156</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>And if they get a hold of one of those straws, you paycheck is likely to be attached. Barack Obama is trying to pick our pockets while attempting to get us to ride bicycles to the local mosque, Democratic operatives are bashing Mitt Romney&#8217;s wife in what was previously off limits according to Obama, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And if they get a hold of one of those straws, you paycheck is likely to be attached. Barack Obama is trying to pick our pockets while attempting to get us to ride bicycles to the local mosque, Democratic operatives are bashing Mitt Romney&#8217;s wife in what was previously <i>off limits</i> according to Obama, Executive orders are enveloping existing industry while tax dollars go to industries that don&#8217;t exist, Republicans are standing silent unless it involves pandering for a vote, much to the delight of Democrats. While the circus is indeed in town, keep in mind what the ultimate plan is. The communist left, currently figureheaded by Barack Obama wants to make the United States a 19th century <i>hellopoly,</i> where the one percent carry a hammer and sickle and the 99 percent struggle just to get from A to B. Only the most dire emergency would dictate using every resource available-in this case our money and freedom of movement. Yes, the myth of global warming is still being perpetuated, but it looks like they&#8217;re running out of new lies. So they&#8217;re using old ones.<span id="more-5156"></span></p>
<p>The <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/key-ice-shelf-antarctica-shrunk-85-percent-esa-154218035.html;_ylt=AmXwJrxHUBsxTPp7c9tZAjwbANEA;_ylu=X3oDMTRwNDUzNGhwBGNjb2RlA2dtcHRvcDEwMDBwb29sd2lraXVwcmVzdARtaXQDTmV3cyBmb3IgeW91BHBrZwNhNGQ0ZDEwOS01YjZiLTNhMjAtYTA4NS1mYTY0ZjNhYWJkMTYEcG9zAzEwBHNlYwNuZXdzX2Zvcl95b3UEdmVyA2JlN2E0NTEwLTgxMjYtMTFlMS1iZWY3LTc5ZTE0MzJiYjY0OA--;_ylg=X3oDMTMwbWh1M2dtBGludGwDdXMEbGFuZwNlbi11cwRwc3RhaWQDZGY1ZDMwZjItNjcxNC0zMWQ4LTg2MzktMTk1NWEzMzE2OWNkBHBzdGNhdANzY2llbmNlBHB0A3N0b3J5cGFnZQR0ZXN0Aw--;_ylv=3" target="_blank">big headline</a> was that a <i>key</i> ice shelf in Antarctica has shrunk by 85 percent. Even worse, it only took 17 years for it to happen. Sounds dire doesn&#8217;t it? This <i>must</i> be proof of global warming. How much longer before the venerable Larson B ice shelf is no more? It&#8217;ll probably be a while. The story ran April 6 of this year but the original story-ran in 2002.</p>
<p>That is correct. The MSM is running stories from 10 years ago to promote the global warming hoax. What the story doesn&#8217;t say, is after that heavy <i>tongue</i> of ice broke off years ago, that the area actually regenerated itself and <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2008/09/12/us-climate-polar-idUSLC65229120080912" target="_blank">is <i>growing.</i></a></p>
<blockquote><p>In the southern hemisphere winter, when emperor penguins huddle together against the biting cold, ice on the sea around Antarctica has been increasing since the late 1970s, perhaps because climate change means shifts in winds, sea currents or snowfall.</p></blockquote>
<p>They even lie when they print the truth. <i>Increasing since the &#8217;70&#8242;s.</i> On the other side of the world, the Arctic has seen some <i>natural</i> ebb and flow, but even there, the levels were lower in the 1970&#8242;s. So whether it&#8217;s cold, it&#8217;s warm, ice is increasing, decreasing, whatever-it&#8217;s all due to global warming.</p>
<p>This post isn&#8217;t just about bashing the myth of global warming. <i>Well, maybe a little.</I> This post is really a reminder of what global socialists want to accomplish by perpetuating the myth. Remember, the U.N. wants <a href="m/2010/02/27/u-n-global-warming-price-tag-45-trillion/" target="_blank">$45 trillion</a> to combat the scourge. China and India have already balked, although China has agreed to sell us all the windwills we can handle. Talk about not letting a crisis go to waste.</p>
<p>Although the majority of Americans recognize the scam, Obama is going ahead as if people actually believe global warming is real. He&#8217;s already declared war on the coal industry, has strangled offshore drilling (while bankrolling the same kind of drilling off the shores of Brazil to the <a href="/2009/08/23/obama-lining-the-pocket-of-george-soros/" target="_blank">financial gain of George Soros</a>), and now <a href="http://bunkerville.wordpress.com/2012/04/16/obamas-executive-order-control-of-natural-gas-production/" target="_blank">according to Bunkerville</a> has taken over the natural gas industry. Using the past as an indicator we can surmise how that will turn out. Chinese windmills and Solyndra. How does that sound?</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know if Mittens will bring this up during the campaign. Of course he was a believer before he was a skeptic, so like Obamacare, he <i>can&#8217;t</i> make much of an argument. That&#8217;s too bad because <i>trillions</i> of dollars-our dollars are at stake here, and if Barry gets another four years you can be sure he&#8217;ll do everything possible to take every last dime we have.</p>
<p>A centralized nightmare while spreading the wealth among the new one percent: The ones that steal rather than earn. And all of it based on lie of global warming. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rjjrdq.com/2012/04/16/global-warming-fraudsters-grasping-at-straws/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Climate Fraud is Alive and Well</title>
		<link>http://rjjrdq.com/2011/11/03/climate-fraud-is-alive-and-well/</link>
		<comments>http://rjjrdq.com/2011/11/03/climate-fraud-is-alive-and-well/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 04:19:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rjjrdq</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Socialist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Muller]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjjrdq.com/?p=4896</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Remember the global warming hockey stick graph, the alleged final word of proof that the earth was warming at such an ungodly rate that we should all be dead already? It&#8217;s baaack, but this time with a different face, and for the global warming fraudsters perpetuating this myth, hopefully a little less laughable than [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://rjjrdq.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/si-berkeley-earth-graph.jpg"><img src="http://rjjrdq.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/si-berkeley-earth-graph.jpg" alt="" title="si-berkeley-earth-graph" width="220" height="173" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-4898" /></a>Remember the global warming <i>hockey stick</i> graph, the alleged final word of proof that the earth was warming at such an ungodly rate that we should all be dead already? It&#8217;s baaack, but this time with a different face, and for the global warming fraudsters perpetuating this myth, hopefully a little less laughable than the last scheme. This time, they&#8217;ve tapped a Berkeley liberal who has apparently pretended to be a skeptic all along. Suddenly though, he has seen the light.<span id="more-4896"></span></p>
<p>Richard Muller, a Berkeley University physics professor has come up with <a href="http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/manitoba/story/2011/11/03/climate-change-berkley-muller.html"target="_blank">yet another study</a> that shows the earth warming at such an alarming rate, that his graph resembles Michael Mann&#8217;s infamous hockey stick graph that has been proven a fraud. His conclusion is that the earth is warming right in line with the United Nation&#8217;s predictions, although one of the co-authors of the study disputes the assertion.</p>
<p>This isn&#8217;t the only story I&#8217;ve seen on <i>climate change</i> in the last few days. The AP, who has been in the tank on the global warming fraud from the beginning are <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/biggest-jump-ever-seen-global-warming-gases-183955211.html" target="_blank">sounding the alarm</a> bells, equating man made greenhouse gases with global warming. Not only has this not been proven to be the case, the <i>climategate</i> scandal exposed how <i>scientists</i> actively sought to cover up data that would prove otherwise. Nevertheless, the bogus numbers that came out of the University of East Anglia made it into the IPCC report and suddenly that became the bible of global warming. Never mind that the U.N. themselves acknowledge the bad numbers and false attributions in the report. Most people don&#8217;t even know about that.</p>
<p>Did you think the social justice engineers were just going to let this die? The U.N. wants $45 <i>TRILLION</I> for this fraud. We aren&#8217;t talking about nickels and dimes here. We&#8217;re talking about a massive shift of wealth not seen in human history. Even Phil Jones at East Anglia concedes we&#8217;re entering a cooling phase. Doesn&#8217;t matter. This Muller character has decided that we&#8217;re warming, and contrary to the evidence that&#8217;s what the mainstream line will be. What a coincidence, just in time for a major U.N. meeting on climate change in a few weeks. We know what report they&#8217;ll be touting this time around.</p>
<p>So while the mainstrem media diverts us with Herman Cain&#8217;s adventures with the ladies, this multi-trillon dollar fraud is still at full tilt. If Barack Obama gets another four years, we can expect to see the United States gutted in the name of social justice, citing data from NASA and the NOAA that even <i>they admit</i> is <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2010/03/30/nasa-data-worse-than-climategate-data/" target="_blank">even more faulty</a> than the crap from East Anglia!</p>
<p> Socialists can&#8217;t create anything. They can only <i>redistribute</i> as they see fit. Anybody with even a reasonable I.Q. can see how eventually, that translates into everyone eventually being broke. Well, almost everyone. While we will ride bicycles and stand in line for green batteries, guys like Obama will be cruising in limousines and Lear Jets the rest of his life. This global warming <i>revolution</i> is for us, not for them. And who&#8217;s going to put a stop to this? Hell, we even have Republicans on board with this fraud. Open borders and money being siphoned out of the country faster than a job being shipped to China. This is Obama&#8217;s first term. It&#8217;s the second round where the action happens. No accountability, and no worries about reelection.</p>
<p>We don&#8217;t have another election cycle. The Republican establishment are pushing Mitt Romney as their man. A global warming believer. Do you think he&#8217;s the man for the job? All I can say is that he probably won&#8217;t be as gung ho as Obama. But, he&#8217;ll keep the myth alive. And like a Friday the 13th sequel, it&#8217;ll just keep coming back. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rjjrdq.com/2011/11/03/climate-fraud-is-alive-and-well/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Climate Fraudsters: Halt Economic Growth</title>
		<link>http://rjjrdq.com/2010/11/30/climate-fraudsters-halt-economic-growth/</link>
		<comments>http://rjjrdq.com/2010/11/30/climate-fraudsters-halt-economic-growth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2010 09:03:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rjjrdq</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Socialist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cancun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjjrdq.com/?p=3755</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>And the best way to do that will be to redistribute wealth to regimes around the world that will either steal the money, use it to start their own carbon emission party or fritter it away on something unrelated. The science really is settled on this fraud, but as I&#8217;ve said before, this isn&#8217;t [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And the best way to do that will be to redistribute wealth to regimes around the world that will either steal the money, use it to start their own carbon emission party or fritter it away on something unrelated. The science really is settled on this fraud, but as I&#8217;ve said before, this isn&#8217;t about science at all.</p>
<p>194 nations marching in lock step with the corrupt United Nations spewed tons of carbon on their way to Cancun, Mexico for yet another <del datetime="2010-11-30T09:18:35+00:00">global warming </del>wealth redistribution conference. Once again, the main topic is not global warming, climate change or whatever name they&#8217;re giving it this week, but how to divide up the money. Most of those countries came marching in with collection baskets on their shoulders. The lies have become more dramatic and the <i>cure</i> has been become ever more extreme for those countries that would fund this scheme. The United States is at the top of the list of those that stand to lose the most. Up and coming countries like China and India have balked at the prospect of choking off economic growth in the name of socialist fraud.<span id="more-3755"></span> That leaves the U.S. to spread as much wealth as humanly possible to countries like Mexico, Venezuela, Sudan, Saudi Arabia, and yes, even <i>developing countries</i> such as China and India. Yes, we are to borrow money from China and then hand it right back to them so they can fight global warming. <i>You can&#8217;t make this up.</i> Of course, ballot stuffing Mexican President Felipe Caulderon has indicated that his country is switching over to energy saving light bulbs. Maybe I have it all wrong about those third world hell-holes.<!--more--></p>
<p>The consequences for countries like the United States have already been mapped. out. Influential <i>academics</i>, (not sure who they actually influence) such as Kevin Anderson of the <i>Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research</i> knocks the country back 70 years. He advocates <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/copenhagen-climate-change-confe/8165769/Cancun-climate-change-summit-scientists-call-for-rationing-in-developed-world.html" target="_blank">World War II style rationing</a> in the United States, along with a halt to economic growth. You saw that right, <i>a halt</i> to economic growth. But only for us. This would be a halt while allowing <i>poor nations</i> to grow.</p>
<p>Assuming global warming actually existed, how would such a scheme do <i>anything</i> to address the problem? You are correct, it would do nothing. We can see an example of that now. China has become fat on American wealth, and at the same time has become the number one carbon emitter. India is right behind and coming up fast. But again, this isn&#8217;t about the climate at all.</p>
<p>Remember that the <a href="/2010/02/27/u-n-global-warming-price-tag-45-trillion/" target="_blank">United Nations wants <i>$45 trillion</i></a> to fight <i>climate change.</I> Only a fool could believe that giving the likes of Hugo Chavez billions of dollars would save us all from the scourge of climate change. Think about it. That&#8217;s the premise. If the United States and other formerly wealthy countries would return to the 1940&#8242;s while third world dictators pocket their redistributed money, we&#8217;ll all be saved. The whole climate scheme has been proven to be a fraud, and as of now, I don&#8217;t hear a whole lot of Republicans making noise about it. Once that money has been redistributed, it will never be back. Just ask China and India. But then, that&#8217;s the plan, isn&#8217;t it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rjjrdq.com/2010/11/30/climate-fraudsters-halt-economic-growth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Socialist France Hit With Strikes</title>
		<link>http://rjjrdq.com/2010/10/19/socialist-france-hit-with-strikes/</link>
		<comments>http://rjjrdq.com/2010/10/19/socialist-france-hit-with-strikes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 06:55:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rjjrdq</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Socialist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[France]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[socialism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjjrdq.com/?p=3273</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people&#8217;s money-Margaret Thatcher.If you don&#8217;t think that&#8217;s true, just take a trip to France. Running out of other people&#8217;s money is the reason for the rioting in the streets.</p> <p>France is the ultimate nanny society, groomed to accept limitation, and dependent on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://rjjrdq.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/france.jpg"><img src="http://rjjrdq.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/france-150x150.jpg" alt="" title="French police pass by burning car during student demonstration in Nanterre" width="150" height="150" class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-3274" /></a><i>&#8220;The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people&#8217;s money</i>-Margaret Thatcher.<br />If you don&#8217;t think that&#8217;s true, just take a trip to France. Running out of other people&#8217;s money is <i>the</i> reason for the rioting in the streets.</p>
<p>France is the ultimate nanny society, groomed to accept limitation, and dependent on government for survival. The philosophy of socialism has always been predicated on living on borrowed time, and when the money ran out, then the system would collapse, as it has throughout history. For France, <i>the money has run out.</i><span id="more-3273"></span></p>
<p>Like a scene out of an SEIU playbook, <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20101018/ap_on_bi_ge/eu_france_retirement_strikes" target="_blank">strikes are currently gripping France</a>, an explosion of anger over a government proposal to raise the retirement age from 60 to 62. Currently, this is something unheard of in America, but for France, Retiring at 60 means a lifetime pension from the government. Not like Social Security; apparently you can actually live off this pension. The problem is that the government doesn&#8217;t have the money.The strikers from the oil industry either aren&#8217;t buying it, or don&#8217;t care. After all, the only thing they have to look forward to is that government stipend. Taking away two years worth is unacceptable to them. The result are strikes across the country that has either disrupted the normal functioning of the country, or in some cases, ground it to a halt.</p>
<p>Oil tankers sit idly offshore, causing a fuel shortage in the country. Garbage is piling up in the streets, and truckers are blocking traffic all in a show of solidarity against the government proposal. Throw in the looters and the vandals, and you have a country in crisis. You could easily ask the protesters, &#8220;What part of no money do you not understand?&#8221; but at the same time, with a socialist system thrust upon them, they have come to depend on the government taking care of them. When they see the possibility of their handouts being jeopardized, this is the result, as it has been wherever socialism has collapsed.</p>
<p>You think it can&#8217;t happen in the United States? The banks, the mortgage industry, the healthcare system, the car industry have all been annexed by the Obama regime. The borrowing party that is propping up this scheme is bound to come to an end, and when it does, we&#8217;ll be in the same situation as France. Already we see the government not willing or able to provide extended unemployment benefits, and the same goes for Social Security. For the second consecutive year, the elderly and retired will get no benefits increase. The government will tell you where you can work and how much you can make, but when the money runs out, there will be nothing for you.</p>
<p>At least the United States has the opportunity to reverse the damage Obama is causing.<a href="http://rjjrdq.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/burn.jpg"><img src="http://rjjrdq.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/burn-150x150.jpg" alt="" title="burn" width="100" height="100" class="alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-3312" /></a> <i>At least some of it.</i> For France, the damage has been done, and we now see the fruits of their labor. Trying to tell those people now that they&#8217;ll get less and they&#8217;ll like it is being met with unfortunate, if not an expected reaction.</p>
<p>Yet Obama, and those like him still think socialism can work. We see once again that it does not, nor has it ever. How many times does this scenario have to play out? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rjjrdq.com/2010/10/19/socialist-france-hit-with-strikes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Climate Fraudsters Claim 2010 Hottest Year Ever</title>
		<link>http://rjjrdq.com/2010/10/18/climate-fraudsters-claim-2010-hottest-year-ever/</link>
		<comments>http://rjjrdq.com/2010/10/18/climate-fraudsters-claim-2010-hottest-year-ever/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2010 21:07:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rjjrdq</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Socialist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NOAA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjjrdq.com/?p=3249</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Too bad the facts don&#8217;t back it up. But since this isn&#8217;t about climate change at all, the facts don&#8217;t really matter.</p> <p>Global warming. Climate change. Climate disruption. Whatever name it is being called this week, the facts remain the same: It&#8217;s all a scam. It was a cornerstone of Hitler&#8217;s propaganda campaign, the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.freefoto.com/index.jsp" target="_blank"><img src="http://rjjrdq.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/9908_01_2_prev-150x150.jpg" alt="" title="9908_01_2_prev" width="150" height="150" class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-3254" /></a>Too bad the facts don&#8217;t back it up. But since this isn&#8217;t about climate change at all, the facts don&#8217;t really matter.</p>
<p><i>Global warming. Climate change. Climate disruption.</i> Whatever name it is being called this week, the facts remain the same: It&#8217;s all a scam. It was a cornerstone of Hitler&#8217;s propaganda campaign, the <i>big lie</i>, where if you told a lie long enough, people would start to believe it, even if they knew empirically that it wasn&#8217;t true. That is the tactic that the socialist redistributionists are using to part us from our money and control our behavior. Even if you don&#8217;t fall for the scam though, they&#8217;re going to ram it down our throat anyway. After all, it&#8217;s just a front for the real agenda.<span id="more-3249"></span></p>
<p>The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/livescience/20101018/sc_livescience/2010tiedforwarmestonrecordsofar#mwpphu-container" target="_blank">released data</a> that shows that 2010 is tied for the warmest year <i>ever.</i> <a href="http://articles.latimes.com/2010/sep/21/news/la-summerchill21-m" target="_blank">This conflicts</a> with daily news and weather reports throughout the year, but since few actually keep track of that, they can release this bold face lie with relative impunity. <i>I&#8217;ll make sure everyone knows how accurate the report is NOAA.</i></p>
<p>Forget the numbers they came up with. They&#8217;re all concocted. I&#8217;ve said it before, and I&#8217;ll say it again because the agenda is still the same: This is about wealth redistribution. <a href="/2009/12/07/climate-fraud-party-underway-in-copenhagen/" target="_blank">We saw in Copenhagen</a> and <a href="/2010/09/03/redistribution-conference-held-in-geneva/" target="_blank">later in Geneva</a> that the <i>discussion</i> centered around money and not science. We know that the United Nations <a href="/2010/02/27/u-n-global-warming-price-tag-45-trillion/" target="_blank">wants a staggering $45 trillion</a> to dole out to tinpot dictatorships. Their front story is that the money will be used to fight climate change. You don&#8217;t actually need an I.Q. to see through that one. Barack Obama wants to start by <a href="/2010/10/10/taxpayers-to-fund-social-justice-agenda/" target="_blank">handing over $100 billion</a> to the U.N. While unemployment hovers near 10%, unemployed Americans are exceeding the 99 week maximum unemployment benefit amount, and the national debt rises by the hour. Apparently the argument is that your kids can starve as long as we save the planet.</p>
<p>This has been proven a fraud, <a href="/2010/01/22/climate-fraudsters-admit-their-data-is-bogus/" target="_blank">and even admitted</a> as such by the fraudsters themselves. But when we&#8217;re talking about this kind of money you can be sure the lie will continue until somebody pulls the plug. That somebody needs to be the Republicans. They&#8217;ll have their chance in November, and one of their first orders of business is to cut this redistribution scam off at the pass. As if the United States wasn&#8217;t bleeding enough wealth with a massive trade deficit with China, borrowing money that can&#8217;t possibly be repaid, outsourcing of millions of jobs, and being billed for all kinds of U.N. mandates, the U.S. cannot afford such a scheme. Cloward and Piven would agree. This will collapse the United States, and the government will swoop in with a minimum stipend for all. It won&#8217;t matter how productive you are, you will get what the government doles out to you. We see that with the U.N. backed scheme now.</p>
<p>The Republicans need to stand up and call this scam the theft that it is, and then get us the hell out of the U.N. So far, a few murmurs, but the <i>climate change</i> steam roller keeps on coming.   </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rjjrdq.com/2010/10/18/climate-fraudsters-claim-2010-hottest-year-ever/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Health Care Passage Paves The Way For Rest Of Agenda</title>
		<link>http://rjjrdq.com/2010/03/22/health-care-passage-paves-the-way-for-rest-of-agenda/</link>
		<comments>http://rjjrdq.com/2010/03/22/health-care-passage-paves-the-way-for-rest-of-agenda/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 23:59:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rjjrdq</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Socialist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amnesty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[communist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vote]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjjrdq.com/?p=2785</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>We already know all the arguments over the health care bill so there&#8217;s no use in going over that again. If you don&#8217;t know what they are, several blogs on the right can fill you in.</p> <p>Here are the consequences of Bart Stupak bowing to his Marxist king. Now that they have this thing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We already know all the arguments over the health care bill so there&#8217;s no use in going over that again. If you don&#8217;t know what they are, several blogs on the right can fill you in.</p>
<p>Here are the consequences of Bart Stupak bowing to his Marxist king. Now that they have this thing passed, they are more than willing to put up with the legal challenges. Meanwhile, it will be the law of the land. The fact is that it&#8217;s now out of the way (for them), and the table is clear for the rest of the socialist agenda.</p>
<p>Watching Fox last night, it looked as if Geraldo Rivera was going to have an orgasm right there in the studio. As the tally of votes moved towards passage, he knew, as we all knew, that millions of illegal aliens were about to obtain health insurance-compliments the American taxpayer. Step 1. Now the amnesty that Obama has been promising can move full speed ahead. We can fight, write our representatives, rally in the streets, make our views know at town halls, throw the bums out in November, but in the end&#8230;it won&#8217;t make any difference. It made no difference here. These clowns are going to ram their agenda through <i>no matter what</i> the people say. And by the time November rolls around you can expect Obamacare, amnesty, and cap and trade to be the law of the land.</p>
<p>Assuming that the predicted bloodbath in congress comes to fruition, we can&#8217;t assume that it will be so bad that there will be the kinds of numbers that could override a presidential veto. The best we can hope for is to not let bad bills end up on Obama&#8217;s desk. That won&#8217;t change what will occur between now and November. No amount of outrage was able to stop this. So while we follow the rules and play it straight with Washington, they do whatever the hell they want. Once these things are in place, even a titanic effort may not be enough to close the wounds. Take amnesty for example. Once the illegals have been legalized, that&#8217;s it. They, and their families will be here, end of story. Same with the health care. States can sue all they want, but it may be wishful thinking to think that a judge will issue an injunction on the implementation of this bill. No denial of pre-existing conditions go in effect immediately. What do you think is about to happen to premiums? Who will stop that?</p>
<p>I had to vent. We have to fight, but if feels like spitting in the wind. There may not be enough of us. There are those that will walk off the cliff for those socialists, and those that just aren&#8217;t interested in the debate. They&#8217;re lost. Open up the border and we are permanently outnumbered. Look how it&#8217;s working out for us now. There must be some kind of game changer <i>before</i> November. I don&#8217;t think we will have the kind of political power it will take to undo this mess. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rjjrdq.com/2010/03/22/health-care-passage-paves-the-way-for-rest-of-agenda/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Department Of HHS Destroys Obamacare</title>
		<link>http://rjjrdq.com/2009/12/15/department-of-hhs-destroys-obamacare/</link>
		<comments>http://rjjrdq.com/2009/12/15/department-of-hhs-destroys-obamacare/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 06:58:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rjjrdq</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Socialist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjjrdq.com/?p=2238</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Apparently, Obamacares sucks so badly, they can&#8217;t even fake it now. But then, this isn&#8217;t about health care reform, it&#8217;s about Cloward-Piven. Look it up.</p> <p>With a growing majority of Americans opposing the disastrous health care reform that is oozing its way through congress, Harry Reid and his band of idiots are still trying [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apparently, Obamacares sucks so badly, they can&#8217;t even fake it now. But then, this isn&#8217;t about health care reform, it&#8217;s about <i>Cloward-Piven.</i> Look it up.</p>
<p>With a growing majority of Americans opposing the disastrous health care reform that is oozing its way through congress, Harry Reid and his band of idiots are still trying to push what the government now admits is a failed plan. <a href="http://www.investors.com/NewsAndAnalysis/Article.aspx?id=515257" target="_blank">According to the head actuary</a> at the Department of Health and Human Services, under Obamacare (for lack of a worse name) health care costs would <i>rise</i> more than if there was no reform at all. In addition, even after 10 years, there would <i>still</i> be 24 million people uninsured.</p>
<p>Not only that, <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2009/09/03/news/economy/health_care_class_act.fortune/?postversion=2009090310" target="_blank">the Dems have inserted <i>the Class Act</i> into the bill</a>, a Ted Kennedy fiasco that would provide benefits for those that could not perform such simple daily tasks as bathing or feeding themselves. The average buy in would be around $65 per month. The sicker folks that opt-in would eventually be using approximately $75 per day in services. You don&#8217;t need to a math major to see what will happen there. The HHS didn&#8217;t mince words either.</p>
<blockquote><p>According to HHS, because &#8220;individuals with health problems or who anticipate a greater risk of functional limitation would be more likely to participate than those in better-than-average health,&#8221; premiums would rise and rise, causing an &#8220;insurance death spiral&#8221; and making the program &#8220;unsustainable.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>When even the government refers to this thing as <i>a death spiral</i>, you know it&#8217;s bad news. $2.5 trillion, and the costs <i>rise</i> from there. This is Obama&#8217;s idea. I say again, <i>Cloward-Piven.</i> This is all about destroying the system, and I guess it depends what your ideology is as to whether you would consider it <i>reform.</i> You can tell this is all about ideology because they are not listening to the American people. All the protests, all the glaring poll numbers opposing this beast mean nothing to the socialists in Washington. They are going to ram this thing through no matter what we think. If they don&#8217;t have votes in the senate, you know what Harry Reid is going to do. He&#8217;s going for the <i>reconciliation</i> that will only require 50 votes. Not sure why that option even exists. Then again, there may be some consciences in Washington and the specter of this thing being torn apart piece by piece after 2010 even if it does pass. There may be those that feel it isn&#8217;t worth passing. It may not be worth the political damage, not only to individual candidates, but to the Democratic party. Barack Obama obviously doesn&#8217;t care about the party; he cares about the agenda his puppet string holders want.</p>
<p>They&#8217;ve already admitted that this thing is a disaster and will do just the opposite of what they are saying publicly. Let&#8217;s see if the goons in Washington stumble over reality and put this thing to bed, or continue with my theory of aborting a free market democracy, and remaking the country into the bastard child of a 1000 socialists. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rjjrdq.com/2009/12/15/department-of-hhs-destroys-obamacare/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AP Continues To Spew Global Warming Lie</title>
		<link>http://rjjrdq.com/2009/12/03/ap-continues-to-spew-global-warming-lie/</link>
		<comments>http://rjjrdq.com/2009/12/03/ap-continues-to-spew-global-warming-lie/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 02:52:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rjjrdq</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Socialist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjjrdq.com/?p=2115</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Global warming is a myth and a fraud. The whole world knows it now, except, apparently, the AP.</p> <p>As if the IPCC never had their e-mail system hacked into, the AP continues to report on the absolute inevitability of global warming, and the only way to deal with it is to spend money. That&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Global warming is a myth and a fraud. The whole world knows it now, except, apparently, the AP.</p>
<p>As if the IPCC never had their e-mail system hacked into, the <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091204/ap_on_sc/sci_climate_adapting" target="_blank">AP continues to report</a> on the absolute <i>inevitability</i> of global warming, and the only way to deal with it is to spend money. That&#8217;s right. Since we&#8217;ll all have be on stilts in order to avoid drowning in the rising seas, the infrastructure adaptation will cost money, and lots of it. To offer proof of the looming disaster, the AP quotes the chairman of the.. you guessed it, the very same IPCC that have been exposed as frauds. In fact, this may be the biggest fraud of all time if you take into account how much money has been spent, and proposed future spending.</p>
<blockquote><p>Adapting to rising seas and higher temperatures is expected to be a big topic at the U.N. climate-change talks in Copenhagen next week, along with the projected cost — hundreds of billions of dollars, much of it going to countries that cannot afford it.</p></blockquote>
<p>Now we&#8217;re getting to the crux of the issue. This is about redistribution. If the global warming disaster is going to have such dire circumstances for the world, don&#8217;t you think that the economic powers, the wealth that societies globally depend on would have priority? Yes, that would make sense. But this isn&#8217;t about global warming. This is about draining the coffers of wealthy nations and <i>redistributing</i> to poorer nations in order to &#8220;level the playing field. So instead of creating wealth, the UN/socialist plan is to divvy up what exists, and we&#8217;ll all be poor and happy. Apparently these guys have never run a hot dog stand. If they did they would realize what kind of economic suicide this is.</p>
<p>They don&#8217;t realize though, and that&#8217;s the danger. For the UN, the criminal IPCC, Barack Obama, Al Gore, and the rest of fraud perpetuators, their vision of a socialist utopia is blinding them to common sense. As in the past, this crop of boobs are certain <i>it will work this time</i>. Of course, when this plan falls on its face, they&#8217;ll be gone, and the rest of the world will be left holding the bag. The AP will continue to promote the lie as long as they can though, which in the face of damning evidence shouldn&#8217;t be that much longer. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rjjrdq.com/2009/12/03/ap-continues-to-spew-global-warming-lie/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>White House Visitors A Who&#8217;s Who Of Radicals</title>
		<link>http://rjjrdq.com/2009/11/02/white-house-visitors-a-whos-who-of-radicals/</link>
		<comments>http://rjjrdq.com/2009/11/02/white-house-visitors-a-whos-who-of-radicals/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 05:45:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rjjrdq</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Socialist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjjrdq.com/?p=1891</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Barack Obama himself said that you could tell a lot about a person by the people around him. Or something similar to that. Well, let&#8217;s get an idea of what kind of person Obama is. No surprises here.</p> <p>After months of stalling, the White House finally released a partial list of visitors that have [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Barack Obama himself said that you could tell a lot about a person by the people around him. Or something similar to that. Well, let&#8217;s get an idea of what kind of person Obama is. No surprises here.</p>
<p>After months of stalling, the White House finally released a <a href="http://www.floppingaces.net/2009/10/30/white-house-visitor-list-reveals-ayers-other-terrorists-and-radicals-not-just-idle-acquaintances/" target="_blank">partial list of visitors</a> that have stopped by 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. since Barack Obama was installed in January. The list covers many of the usual suspects, those that you would expect to see visiting the president, but other names on the list you wouldn&#8217;t want to meet in an alley, much less the <i>oval office</i>.</p>
<p>Included on the list is one William Ayers. The White House claims that it isn&#8217;t <i>that</i> Bill Ayers. After all, Obama hardly knew him, right? Also on the list was Jeff Jones. There was a co-founder of the <i>Weather Underground</i> named Jeff Jones, who now trolls the Apollo Alliance. Is it <i>that</i> Jeff Jones? How about Jeremiah Wright? Again, the White House claims it it some other guy, and not Obama&#8217;s <i>spiritual mentor.</i> Sure, it was probably some other Jeremiah Wright that just happens to know Barack Obama. Sure. There are verifiable race hustlers on the list though. Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson visited Barry, two goons that are neck and neck in their desire to damage race relations. It was probably some other Angela Davis on the list as well, not the radical communist murderer by the same name.</p>
<p>One name that can&#8217;t be denied is Andy Stern, head of the thug SEIU. We all know what they did to try and fracture tea party protests this summer. He registered 22 visits with Barry. George Soros weighed in as well, and speaking of weighing in, so did Michael Moore. Oh, wait the White House once again claims <i>not that Michael Moore.</i> Stunning coincidences here. No coincidence is that the upper echelon (or lowest, depending on how you see it) have visited the White House. Everyone from Bill Gates to Jeff Immelt, CEO of General Electric. Well, those could have been legitimate meetings. After all, Wall Street has a lot to say when it comes to the economy. In fact, they said plenty during the presidential campaign, funneling more money to Obama than any other candidate. Now Timmy the tax cheat Geithner, a Goldman Sachs thug, has his hands wrapped around the throat of the U.S. Treasury. Just an observation.</p>
<p>This is only a partial list, and even that is muddled with denials of just who is who by the White House. That is the White House position. You can&#8217;t prove who these people are, so we will tell you whatever we want. In my opinion, we really didn&#8217;t need the list. Barack Obama&#8217;s radical associations are well documented, and this list of names just helps confirm what is already known. We already know Barry. Might be interesting to see the names they <i>didn&#8217;t</i> release though.    </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rjjrdq.com/2009/11/02/white-house-visitors-a-whos-who-of-radicals/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Socialist Dems May Go It Alone&#8230;Again</title>
		<link>http://rjjrdq.com/2009/08/20/socialist-dems-may-go-it-alone-again/</link>
		<comments>http://rjjrdq.com/2009/08/20/socialist-dems-may-go-it-alone-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 04:01:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rjjrdq</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Socialist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[socialism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjjrdq.com/?p=1407</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Is anybody surprised? That was probably the plan all along. Barack Obama seemingly conceded that point when he said get out of the way.</p> <p>When did Obama seek bipartisanship since January? The stimulus bill? Cap and tax? Gitmo? Iran? North Korea? Israel? And now with the health care debacle, he&#8217;s going to slap the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is anybody surprised? That was probably the plan all along. Barack Obama seemingly conceded that point when he said <i>get out of the way</i>.</p>
<p>When did Obama seek bipartisanship since January? The <i>stimulus bill</i>? Cap and tax? Gitmo? Iran? North Korea? Israel? And now with the health care debacle, he&#8217;s going to slap the 85% of people who are happy with their current health insurance and force them on a government plan. Yes, force. When you lowball the competition with the help of subsidies from the pocket the insured themselves, you&#8217;ll have employers jumping on the government plan left and right in order to save money. Those same companies will be taxed by Obama, so they&#8217;ll have to cut corners <i>somewhere</i>.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s where the tax paying insurance holding American comes in. There&#8217;s no way private industry can compete with a subsidized program that will have all the efficiency of the U.S. Post Office. Even Obama admitted that it will be a disaster using the post office as an example (came out wrong didn&#8217;t it Barry), but he has an agenda. He&#8217;s looking 10, 15, 20 years down the road when the <i>utopia</i> will finally be realized. In the meantime, lives will be shattered, but as Obama indicated to auto workers facing layoffs, <i>it&#8217;s a sacrifice you&#8217;ll have to make</i>&#8230;for the greater good.</p>
<p><a href="http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2009/08/obamademocrats-to-americans-drop-dead.html" target="_blank">The corrupt, socialist cabal in Washington has no love for the American people</a>. To them we&#8217;re just a bunch of un American <i>evil mongers</i>, the type that should be turned in. Well, at least they dumped that idea. <i>That&#8217;s what I hear anyway.</i></p>
<p>Barack Obama has admitted that he&#8217;s open to a one term presidency. I don&#8217;t think he really wants the job. It&#8217;s the agenda he&#8217;s interested in. And he&#8217;s got unions, but pharma, Wall Street, race based illegal alien advocates, and most of the socialist/fascist dictators on the planet backing him up. Some of those fascists are prone to slapping him around though. Worth it though, isn&#8217;t Barry? Not bad for a pot smoking punk that can&#8217;t even produce a birth certificate. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rjjrdq.com/2009/08/20/socialist-dems-may-go-it-alone-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

