<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>rjjrdq&#039;s America II &#187; Religion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rjjrdq.com/category/religion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rjjrdq.com</link>
	<description>Still good, still bad, and still absurd...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 05:25:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Sharia Law Imposed in Pennsylvania</title>
		<link>http://rjjrdq.com/2012/02/26/sharia-law-imposed-in-pennsylvania/</link>
		<comments>http://rjjrdq.com/2012/02/26/sharia-law-imposed-in-pennsylvania/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2012 11:03:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rjjrdq</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Islam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Martin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Muslim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjjrdq.com/?p=5103</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Of all the Republican presidential candidates, only Herman Cain touched on the subject of creeping sharia in the United States. He was promptly attacked by both the media and radical Islamists alike. The other candidates turned tail and ran from the controversy, more interested in gaining favor with any voter than actually dealing with [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of all the Republican presidential candidates, only Herman Cain touched on the subject of creeping sharia in the United States. He was promptly attacked by both the media and radical Islamists <i>alike.</i> The other candidates turned tail and ran from the <i>controversy</i>, more interested in gaining favor with <i>any</i> voter than actually dealing with a real issue. Let me share a tale of what happens when you don&#8217;t deal with the issue of Islam in America.<span id="more-5103"></span></p>
<p>Oklahoma passed SQ755 <i>overwhelmingly</i>, which would guarantee sharia law would never be imposed in an Oklahoma courtroom. The law was immediately challenged the terror coddling criminals at CAIR, the very kind of organization that would impose sharia law in the United States. A court blocked the law, citing that there had never been a case of sharia law practice in an American courtroom. Of course this was false. There was a <a href="http://rjjrdq.com/2011/03/24/sharia-law-taking-hold-in-america/" target="_blank">case in Florida</a> where a judge forced a party <i>against its will</i> to go to trial under sharia law. There was yet another case in Chris Christie&#8217;s New Jersey where the same thing happened. We can be naive and presume the appeals court in Oklahoma were unaware of this. <i>They could have asked me.</i></p>
<p>Now we have a <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/judge-dismisses-charges-against-muslim-man-attacked-atheist-204051912.html;_ylt=AhsV_m3Nu_RypAI4jz3GGHU1y8F_;_ylu=X3oDMTMyOW9wZmp1BG1pdANBcnRpY2xlIFJlbGF0ZWQgSUIEcGtnA2ZhMTczZDljLWM2NDEtMzIyOS1hM2ZmLWNjN2MxMTI5Y2JlMwRwb3MDMgRzZWMDTWVkaWFJbmZpbml0ZUJyb3dzZQR2ZXID;_ylg=X3oDMTJ2NjQ5bDdyBGludGwDdXMEbGFuZwNlbi11cwRwc3RhaWQDOTAzMTRmMmQtYWE5MC0zN2FjLTkxNmMtYWUyNGZkYWM1YjI2BHBzdGNhdAN1c3x5Y24EcHQDc3RvcnlwYWdlBHRlc3QD;_ylv=3" target="_blank">case in Pennsylvania</a>, birthstate of the Constitution. During a Halloween parade, members of <i>Parading Atheists of Central Pennsylvania</i> posed as <i>zombie Mohammed</i> and <i>zombie pope.</i> A Muslim man in the crowd took umbrage with the zombie Mohammed depiction and attacked Ernest Perce while ignoring zombie pope. He was arrested, and the case went to court. That&#8217;s where it really got ugly.</p>
<p>Judge Mark Martin threw out the case, despite the fact that there was video evidence of the attack and the attacker, Talaag Elbayomy admitted to the attack. Apparently, this idiot thought is was illegal to depict Mohammed. Not here, not yet&#8230;</p>
<p>Not only did Martin throw out the case, he tore into Perce as if <i>he</i> were the criminal.</p>
<blockquote><p>Martin further dressed down Perce for his insensitive behavior, going so far as to call him a doofus and telling him that in Muslim societies he could have been put to death for mocking Muhammad.</p></blockquote>
<p>It turns out that the judge himself is a convert to Islam and went out of his way to impose sharia law as best he could. He couldn&#8217;t impose the death penalty, but made it clear to Perce that if he had the authority he would have.</p>
<p>Remember when Newt Gingrich said he would haul judges before congress and make them explain their activist decisions? It sounded crazy at the time, but after reading about this-it still sounds crazy, but not as much now. This clown Martin needs to be held accountable. He needs to be hauled in to explain himself, but as far as I know, there is no mechanism at all that would facilitate that.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not familiar with Pennsylvania law, so I&#8217;m not sure whether Perce can appeal this decision. If not, sharia lives. If so, Perce may face yet another Islamic sympathizer that will uphold the decision. Save Herman Cain, not a word from the other GOP candidates. Not enough spine between the four that are left to deal with Islam here, on our shores. They talk tough about extremists <i>over there</i>, but here, in our courtrooms, they&#8217;re silent. Pray that you never get wrapped up in litigation with a Muslim. And <i>God</i> help you if you follow the wrong <i>religion</i>. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rjjrdq.com/2012/02/26/sharia-law-imposed-in-pennsylvania/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#8217;s National Prayer Debacle</title>
		<link>http://rjjrdq.com/2012/02/03/obamas-national-prayer-debacle/</link>
		<comments>http://rjjrdq.com/2012/02/03/obamas-national-prayer-debacle/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 07:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rjjrdq</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Prayer Breakfast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjjrdq.com/?p=5066</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The big surprise is that Barack Obama actually showed up at the National Prayer Breakfast this year. What comes as no surprise is some of things he said. If you recall, he lambasted middle America for being anti-immigrant, who clung to &#8216;guns and religion,&#8217; and is now using the bible that those folks are [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The big surprise is that Barack Obama actually showed up at the National Prayer Breakfast this year. What comes as no surprise is some of things he said. If you recall, he lambasted middle America for being anti-immigrant, who clung to &#8216;guns and religion,&#8217; and is now using the bible that those folks are clinging to in order to justify his agenda. How Saul Alinsky reconciles with the <i>King James</i> version of the bible can only be described as perverted at its most benign. At the National Prayer Breakfast, Obama <a href="http://www.buzzfeed.com/zekejmiller/obama-i-pushed-dodd-frank-and-health-care-reform" target="_blank">gave a lesson</a> in perversion 101.<span id="more-5066"></span></p>
<p>The Obama regime is so entangled with Wall Street that it&#8217;s hard to tell them apart sometimes. Tim Geithner will tell you, as well as the Citi Bank hack Jack Lew that is now his <i>chief of staff.</i> There are many other nameless Wall Street types that troll the administration. But at the prayer breakfast, Obama professed to believe that you should <i>love thy neighbor as thyself</i>. Indeed, he has done just that. So while he lectures Wall Street in front of the rest of us, the conversation is very different behind the scenes. I don&#8217;t care that Obama surrounds himself with Wall Street; he should stop pretending that he doesn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>That was just for starters. He moved on to taxes, specifically for the wealthy, which so far, has been a fuzzy line with this regime. He took <a href="http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Luke%2012:35-48;&#038;version=NIV;" target="=blank">a parable</a> from the Gospel of Luke out of context for this one. Unwittingly, Obama used a line from the parable that should be applied to him. It is a parable about the consequences of abusing authority that has been bestowed upon you. It has <i>nothing</i> to do with money, or the rich <i>paying their fair share.</i></p>
<p>He even defended his foreign policy, once again perverting a passage from the bible to do so.</p>
<p><i>Speak up for those who cannot speak for themselves, for the rights of all who are destitute</i></p>
<p>This is the guy that championed the rise of the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, even now routing new aid to the regime. He installed al-Qaeda in Libya, who&#8217;s atrocities are being ignored by the msm. At the same time he stands by and does nothing about Syria. Maybe it&#8217;s better if he doesn&#8217;t do anything. He does nothing about Iran, even when the opposition begged for some kind of support a few years back. Barry didn&#8217;t want to interfere in an internal country&#8217;s affairs. Unless it was Egypt of Libya of course.</p>
<p>It was a brazen perversion of the bible in order to further his unpopular agenda. As unpopular as it is though, he could still win in November. That speaks more to the Republicans than to him. This should have been the easiest road Republicans ever had to the White House. The people were fired up in 2010, there was a bloodbath in congress, and all the Repubicans had to do is grab the brass ring. Instead, we got Newt and Mitt, who are making this a down to the wire drama.</p>
<p>You can add blasphemy to the list of Obama gaffes, and still he might win in November. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rjjrdq.com/2012/02/03/obamas-national-prayer-debacle/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Merry Christmas</title>
		<link>http://rjjrdq.com/2011/12/25/merry-christmas/</link>
		<comments>http://rjjrdq.com/2011/12/25/merry-christmas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2011 07:59:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rjjrdq</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christmas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjjrdq.com/?p=5000</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I know it&#8217;s a little late here, but Merry Christmas to all. I&#8217;m going to complain a little, but not too much, because this has been a great Christmas season for me and my family.</p> <p>Merry Christmas. Seems like a simple enough statement, but not everyone is on board with it. While shopping this [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://rjjrdq.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/the_birth_of_christ.jpg"><img src="http://rjjrdq.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/the_birth_of_christ.jpg" alt="" title="the_birth_of_christ" width="200" height="150" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-3902" /></a>I know it&#8217;s a little late here, but Merry Christmas to all. I&#8217;m going to complain a little, but not too much, because this has been a great Christmas season for me and my family.<span id="more-5000"></span></p>
<p><i>Merry Christmas.</i> Seems like a simple enough statement, but not everyone is on board with it. While shopping this season, when I wished the cashier a Merry Christmas, usually I get a <i>Happy Holidays</i> to you, or <i>to you as well</i> in return. A few bucked the trend and reciprocated though.</p>
<p>Then there was the ban on any kind of religious symbology at work this season. Anything coming from the company had to do with Happy Holidays in the most generic kind of way. Most of the employees were of the Merry Christmas persuasion though.</p>
<p>Then there was the news report I saw tonight. People flocked to<br />
Bethlehem to see the <i>what Christians believe to be</i> the birthplace of Jesus Christ. I hadn&#8217;t heard it described like that before.</p>
<p>As I posted last year, Christmas means different things to different people, and although I&#8217;m tempted to rant on, that fact is that this holiday season has been very nice, and Christmas was a festive, joyful experience this year. Not even what I consider attacks on the traditional American Christmas could dampen the spirit of  this season. I just want to say that I hope that all of you are enjoying this time as I am and that nothing will rise to the level of spoiling that.</p>
<p>Merry Christmas, and God bless you all. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rjjrdq.com/2011/12/25/merry-christmas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lowe&#8217;s, Hertz Take On Islam</title>
		<link>http://rjjrdq.com/2011/12/18/lowes-hertz-take-on-islam/</link>
		<comments>http://rjjrdq.com/2011/12/18/lowes-hertz-take-on-islam/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2011 10:41:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rjjrdq</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hertz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Islam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lowe's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Muslim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ron Paul]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjjrdq.com/?p=4980</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>When put on the spot, most companies in America will bend to the will of Islam, accommodating the whiners in a variety of ways. A few companies have had enough of the march to an Islamic caliphate and are fighting back. They won&#8217;t get much support from the United States government, and certainly not [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When put on the spot, most companies in America will bend to the will of Islam, accommodating the whiners in a variety of ways. A few companies have had enough of the march to an Islamic caliphate and are fighting back. They won&#8217;t get much support from the United States government, and certainly not from this current administration. Even Ron Paul has jumped on the dhimmi bandwagon, portraying Muslims as just good folks being harassed by the West. For the companies that are standing up to Islam, they will need our support, because they can&#8217;t realistically expect to get any from their government.<span id="more-4980"></span></p>
<p>A program being run by <i>The Learning channel</i> (TLC) chronicles the <i>ordinary</i> lives of five Muslim families in the United States. The show is meant to show that Muslims are <i>just like us</i> and are as true blue American as anybody else. Lowe&#8217;s decided to pull their advertising from the show, and the reaction of the Muslim community in America shows that they are not like the rest of us at all. The story is that some fringe evangelical group down South essentially bullied Lowe&#8217;s into pulling their ads. You know, if all it took was a few e-mails we could have all the jobs sent to China and India back here by next year. Lowe&#8217;s saw that it might do more harm than good in running ads during that program. The reaction from Islam was swift.</p>
<p>A <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/lowes-stores-face-protests-pulling-ads-american-muslim-141100552.html" target="_blank">protest was scheduled</a> for Saturday at the Lowe&#8217;s in Dearborn Michigan, a city saturated with Muslims who showed they are American in name only. Well, we can only assume they will all be Americans at the protest. Dhimmi groups like the racist NAACP and terror coddlers and unindicted co-conspirators CAIR will be on hand as well. Yeah. Ask Eric Holder why CAIR was <i>unindicted.</i></p>
<p>As with most businesses, they&#8217;ll sell to anybody. Lowe&#8217;s has a store in Dearborn. That&#8217;s not good enough for Islam, or the dhimmis that support them. Leave it to a California politician to <a href="http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-1212-lowes-muslims-20111212,0,5764837.story" target="_blank">embarrass the state</a> over this matter.</p>
<blockquote><p>California Sen. Ted Lieu (D-Torrance) said he was considering a boycott.</p>
<p> Calling Lowe&#8217;s decision &#8220;un-American&#8221; and &#8220;naked religious bigotry,&#8221; Lieu said he may seek legislative action if Lowe&#8217;s doesn&#8217;t apologize to Muslims and reinstate its ads. The senator sent a letter outlining his complaints to Lowe&#8217;s Chief Executive Robert A. Niblock.</p></blockquote>
<p>A boycott, <i>and legislative action.</i> Not sure what they could legally do to Lowe&#8217;s, but then, the law doesn&#8217;t mean much in America anymore. I wonder if the reaction would have been the same if this had been a Jewish or a Catholic program. Actually, I don&#8217;t wonder. It wouldn&#8217;t have been news at all.</p>
<p>Lowe&#8217;s isn&#8217;t the only target of Islam though. <a href="http://www.jihadwatch.org/2011/10/hertz-fires-25-muslim-drivers-in-dispute-over-clocking-out-for-prayer-breaks.html" target="_blank">Hertz fired 25 Muslims</a> who refused to clock out for their alleged prayer breaks, and took longer than the alotted break time to do-whatever it is they were doing. Apparently, the break time these Muslim cab drivers were taking were being used for all kinds of other activities. Hertz went out of their way to accommodate these workers, and they took advantage of the company.</p>
<p>In fact, two years ago, several of these same individuals sued Hertz for religious discrimination. Under an agreement reached then, these workers were to clock out for their prayer breaks, with access to a prayer room <i>provided by Hertz.</i> Once again, not good enough for Islam. The union representing the workers have filed a grievance with the National Labor Relations Board.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know about you, but if I was taking a break <i>whenever</i> for any length of time I would have my job very long. Apparently, these Muslims want special accommodations just for them. <i>Just like us.</I> The issue is currently pending.</p>
<p>As if the non-stop attacks on American companies wasn&#8217;t bad enough, <a href="http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Elections/President/2011/1216/GOP-candidates-blast-Ron-Paul-over-Iran-policy.-Is-one-side-crazy" target="_blank">Ron Paul gets up on stage</a> at the last debate and basically bashes America in defense of Islam.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;To declare war on 1.2 billion Muslims and say all Muslims are the same, this is dangerous talk. Yeah, there are some radicals. But they don&#8217;t come here to kill us because we&#8217;re free and prosperous. Do they go to Switzerland and Sweden? I mean, that&#8217;s absurd. If you think that is the reason, we have no chance of winning this. They come here and they explicitly explain it to us. The CIA has explained it to us. They said they come here and want to do us harm because we&#8217;re bombing them.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Where do I begin? Who declared war on 1.2 billion Muslims? Unless it is Ron Paul himself that has declared that <i>all Muslims are the same.</i> <i>We have no chance of winning this.</i> Interesting statement, Ron. Yes, even Ron Paul acknowledges a war. He just doesn&#8217;t want to fight it. Most of the 9-11 hijackers were from Saudi Arabia. I don&#8217;t recall bombing them recently Ron. Do they go to Switzerland and Sweden? Yes, they do Ron. In fact, the Swiss passed a referendum banning minarets in the country, a sign of Muslim dominance. There are areas in that country that are now off-limits to a non-Muslims. As is the case in France, as is the case in England&#8230;</p>
<p>They want to come here and harm us because we&#8217;re bombing them, eh, Ron? It is you Ron, that has lumped <i>all of Islam</i> into a single group. <i>Bomb one of us and you bomb all of us.</i> You know what Ron, you might have something there. You want to deny it, but inadvertently made a case for Muslims being a dangerous mob. And as for actually believing any propaganda that was fed to the CIA-there&#8217;s that cotton candy and unicorn, <i>we can all talk this out</i> attitude. Ask Lowe&#8217;s and Hertz if they think that&#8217;s true.</p>
<p>Herman Cain stood up to Islam, but he&#8217;s gone now. Bachmann sounded pretty good regarding Iran, but I don&#8217;t know how <i>accommodating</i> these candidates would be towards Islam.</p>
<p>Demanding, intolerant, and hands down the most violent &#8220;religion&#8221; on the globe, at least a few companies are taking a stand and at least, if not fighting the scourge of Islam, are at minimum defending their right to conduct business as they see fit. That&#8217;s not the way it works in a totalitarian theocracy though, and companies like Lowe&#8217;s and Hertz are finding that out now. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rjjrdq.com/2011/12/18/lowes-hertz-take-on-islam/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Herman Cain Exposes Islam-Again</title>
		<link>http://rjjrdq.com/2011/11/15/herman-cain-exposes-islam-again/</link>
		<comments>http://rjjrdq.com/2011/11/15/herman-cain-exposes-islam-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 05:05:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rjjrdq</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Herman Cain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Islam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjjrdq.com/?p=4923</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately, his campaign fell into slimy politician mode shortly afterwards. One of the things that endears Herman Cain to voters is his off the cuff style, and say what he means approach. Of course, with such an approach, there&#8217;s plenty of damage control that needs to be done, but in the case of Islam, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately, his campaign fell into slimy politician mode shortly afterwards. One of the things that endears Herman Cain to voters is his off the cuff style, and say what he means approach. Of course, with such an approach, there&#8217;s plenty of damage control that needs to be done, but in the case of Islam, the damage control is needless and just adds to the perception-perhaps rightly so, that Herman Cain isn&#8217;t ready for the national stage.<span id="more-4923"></span></p>
<p>Earlier this year <a href="/2011/03/31/herman-cain-slams-creeping-sharia/" target="_blank">Herman Cain stated</a> that he would not have a Muslim in his presidential cabinet, nor would he appoint one as a federal judge. He slammed the creeping sharia in the United States and said it had no place in our government. He&#8217;s absolutely right. He later apologized to the Muslim community for those remarks, but to his credit, stood by them. In that case, not only was there no need for damage control, the actions that he took didn&#8217;t diffuse what apparently, his campaign thought was an affront to Islam. It was no affront. Whiners like CAIR know for a fact that Cain spoke the truth. They just want him to shut up.</p>
<p>Well, Cain won&#8217;t shut up, and that is causing headaches for his campaign. Cain has plenty of issues to deal with, but this shouldn&#8217;t be one of them. In a recent <a href="http://www.gq.com/news-politics/politics/201111/herman-cain-interview-alan-richman-chris-heath-devin-gordon?currentPage=1" target="_blank">interview with GQ</a>, Cain stated that <i>the majority</i> of Muslims in the United States share extremist views.</p>
<blockquote><p>And I have had one very well known Muslim voice say to me directly that a majority of Muslims share the extremist views.</p>
<p>Chris Heath: A majority?</p>
<p>Herman Cain: Yes, a majority.</p>
<p>Devin Gordon: Do you think he’s right?</p>
<p>Herman Cain: Yes, because that’s his community. That’s his community. I can’t tell you his name, but he is a very prominent voice in the Muslim community, and he said that.</p>
<p>Chris Heath: I just find that hard to believe.</p>
<p>Herman Cain: I find it hard to believe.</p>
<p>Chris Heath: But you’re believing it?</p>
<p>Herman Cain: Yes, because of the respect that I have for this individual. Because when he told me this, he said he wouldn’t want to be quoted or identified as having said that.</p>
<p>Alan Richman: Are you talking about the Muslim community in America? Or the world?</p>
<p>Herman Cain: America. America.</p></blockquote>
<p>His campaign later <i>clarified</i> his statement, saying that Cain really meant <i>outside of America.</i></p>
<p>Really? He sounded pretty clear he was talking about the U.S. of A there. I have no reason to doubt what Cain asserted. Why would he make up such a thing? He wouldn&#8217;t. There was no need to appease those that aren&#8217;t going to vote for him anyway. Cain is falling into political correctness, a fatal trap for conservatives.</p>
<p>Cain has <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5i7sJb_u94R10zdNTEGWEw0sxgEZw?docId=c951d43f82cf4ffb8623c4919ea9105c" target="_blank">plenty of issues</a> to deal with, especially in the foreign policy arena. Chris Wallace over at FOX had to school him on the air about the Palestinian <i>right of return</i>, and what a return to the 1967 borders would mean to Israel. Even more recently he botched a question on whether he supported Obama&#8217;s actions in Libya. He seemed embarrassingly confused, contradicting himself in the process. He literally had no clue. C&#8217;mon Herm, I could have answered that question for you. The Libyan <i>rebels</i> are al-Qaeda. <i>They admit it.</i> The Muslim Brotherhood is taking over in Egypt. The Palestinians refuse to recognize Israel&#8217;s existence, Iran is building nukes, Karzai in Afghanistan says he&#8217;ll back Pakistan in a war with the U.S., and the list goes on. You could have gotten all that from the New York Times. I hate to say it, but he would be torn apart in a debate with Obama. He doesn&#8217;t know anything.</p>
<p>Cain has issues-big issues; he&#8217;s clueless on foreign policy, his 999 plan has been torn to shreds, and he seemed to be mishandling the harassment scandal until the left trotted out Gloria Allred to destroy any semblance of viability. Cain has it right on Islam. I hope they pound him on it in the next debate, just like I hope they pound Rick Perry on immigration. Get those issues front and center. Of course the left is going to scream and howl. That&#8217;s how we know we&#8217;re making progress. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rjjrdq.com/2011/11/15/herman-cain-exposes-islam-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Michelle Bachmann Re-Exposes Obama&#8217;s Islamist Agenda</title>
		<link>http://rjjrdq.com/2011/10/30/michelle-bachmann-re-exposes-obamas-islamist-agenda/</link>
		<comments>http://rjjrdq.com/2011/10/30/michelle-bachmann-re-exposes-obamas-islamist-agenda/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 01:07:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rjjrdq</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Islam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Lieberman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MIchelle Bachmann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Muslim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjjrdq.com/?p=4883</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Presidential candidate Michelle Bachmann has already been branded as a nut by the left, so in my opinion, it doesn&#8217;t matter what she says. Her latest comments happen to be right on the mark, but since the MSM is part of the left wing attack on Bachmann, they&#8217;ve twisted her remarks, and even diverted [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Presidential candidate Michelle Bachmann has already been branded as a nut by the left, so in my opinion, it doesn&#8217;t matter what she says. Her latest comments happen to be right on the mark, but since the MSM is part of the left wing attack on Bachmann, they&#8217;ve twisted her remarks, and even diverted from what she said.<span id="more-4883"></span></p>
<p>When <a href="/2011/03/31/herman-cain-slams-creeping-sharia/" target="_blank">Herman Cain stated</a> that he would not have a Muslim in his administration, the Alinskyites and the rest of the MSM attacked him mercilessly. He currently tops the polls among GOP presidential contenders. He spoke the truth, and people liked what they heard. All except the dhimmis that bow to Islam and are like deer in the headlights facing the movement to Islamize the world. Not everyone is waiting for that to happen.</p>
<p>It was <a href="/2010/04/12/joe-lieberman-hammers-obama-on-national-security/" target="_blank">Joe Liberman that first voiced his outrage</a> to the Obama regime&#8217;s plans to remove all references to <i>Islamic terror</i> and <i>Islamic extremists</i> from the national security lexicon. Basically any references that shed a negative light on Islam was to be removed <i>from all documents.</i> Now Michelle Bachmann is attempting to make the issue headline news, something it should have been all along. She accuses the Obama regime of succumbing to pressure from Islamic groups to remove the accurate language from national security documents.</p>
<blockquote><p>“And now Obama is allowing terror suspect groups to write the FBI’s terror training manual,” she told about 75 Republican activists in an eastern Iowa hotel conference room.</p></blockquote>
<p>I would go a step further and suggest that Obama is actually working with these groups to help the spread of sharia law on a global scale. He&#8217;s done a hell of a job in the Middle East and North Africa in that regard. Egypt, Tunisia, Libya, his willingness to bow to the Taliban in Afghanistan? I&#8217;ve made my case, and Michelle Bachmann has made hers.</p>
<p>Of course, the MSM has their own case. <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/in-accusing-administration-of-deferring-to-pro-islamic-groups-bachmann-exaggerates-directive/2011/10/28/gIQAlMtSQM_story.html" target="_blank">I&#8217;ve provided a link</a> to an article because that&#8217;s where I saw Bachmann&#8217;s comments. The story itself&#8230;well, let&#8217;s say it deviates from what Bachmann actually said. Of course, it&#8217;s an AP article, and can be found from WaPo to ABC to the New York Times. Same article. It&#8217;s tough to find out what she actually said because the Web is flooded with this particular article, but based on the <i>biased</i> article, Bachmann&#8217;s comments were limited in scope and <i>didn&#8217;t go far enough.</i></p>
<p>Okay, the FBI falls under the jurisdiction of the JD. But even then, <del datetime="2011-10-30T06:03:41+00:00">WaPo</del> AP couldn&#8217;t even cover for the FBI&#8217;s efforts to erase negative references to Islam. So what did they do? They changed the subject. They threw out a few numbers about the number of troops killed in Iraq that Bachmann got wrong. She does tend to get numbers wrong, and the MSM are waiting for it like raw meat. Of course, Bachmann knows the United States is 50 strong, not the 57 that Obama thinks.</p>
<p>Gaffes are gaffes, and facts are facts. That&#8217;s okay that the MSM will call out a candidate when they get something wrong. But when they use those gaffes to counter factual information, the kind that would damage the Obama regime, then it ceases to become news and becomes a political hit piece. Bachmann is right about this. Lieberman was right when he protested the moves, but AP has gone as far as saying Bachmann is <i>exaggerating</i> the directive. Lieberman didn&#8217;t think so, and neither do I. Obama is removing all references to Islamic extremism while promoting sharia law around the world. Can anybody dispute me on this? WaPo, AP, this is an open invitation. Send your best goons over. I&#8217;ll debate you on this. Better yet, go debate Bachmann, or even Joe Lieberman. I didn&#8217;t think so. Standing offer though. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rjjrdq.com/2011/10/30/michelle-bachmann-re-exposes-obamas-islamist-agenda/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Religion of Peace Strikes Again</title>
		<link>http://rjjrdq.com/2011/09/12/religion-of-peace-strikes-again/</link>
		<comments>http://rjjrdq.com/2011/09/12/religion-of-peace-strikes-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2011 04:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rjjrdq</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Egypt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Islam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Muslim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjjrdq.com/?p=4767</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>While Muslims moan about how persecuted they are since 9-11, their actions continue to warrant any perceived persecution they may or may not be enduring. No need to fret though. There are plenty of dhimmis in the United States that are doing every thing they can to make sure sharia law will dominate in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While Muslims moan about how persecuted they are since 9-11, their actions continue to warrant any perceived persecution they may or may not be enduring. No need to fret  though. There are plenty of dhimmis in the United States that are doing every thing they can to make sure sharia law will dominate in the coming decades.<span id="more-4767"></span></p>
<p>It seems as if these days the <i>Arab spring</i> has not gotten nearly the headlines it did at its inception. While the thugs that ruled various Muslim nations were in power, the media fueled the outrage espoused by the thugs that would want to take their place. After that happened, the news died down, although there is still plenty of news to report. We&#8217;ve found out in recent days that the Libyan <i>rebels</i> are indeed al-Qaeda, just as was suspected by NATO. Obama was under orders to continue supporting them with air power-and whatever else he could do. Obama obeyed.</p>
<p>Now we see in the chaotic aftermath of revolution in Egypt what Hosni Mubarak has kept a lid on all these years. When militant thugs attacked civilians in Israel, the Israeli&#8217;s responded as they always do: with restrained, but very effective force. They chased the Palestinias goons into the Sinai, and in the ensuing firefight, somehow Egyptian police were killed. What they were doing there in the middle of the action was anybody&#8217;s guess, but for the Egyptian people, many disciples of the Muslim brotherhood, time for talk is over.</p>
<p>Egypt pulled their ambassador from Israel pending an investigation. That was just for starters. Thousands of Egyptians are now roaming the streets, and up to 3000 of them have <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2011/WORLD/meast/09/10/egypt.protests/index.html?hpt=hp_t2" target="_blank">laid waste to the Israeli embassy</a>. Make no mistake. This isn&#8217;t about dead Egyptian cops, who the Muslim Brotherhood and their followers see as a remnant of the Mubarak regime. This was virulent anti-Semitism on display-once again from the Muslim street.</p>
<p>While the strangling weed of Islam suffocates the Middle East, that same weed is being nutured in the United States. In yet another <i>Muslim outreach</i> attempt by law enforcement, Seattle authorities, along with the FBI, pissed off the Muslim <i>community</i> there while <a href="http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2016171004_copworkshop11m.html" target="_blank">attempting to bow down</a> to them.</p>
<blockquote><p>But the event grew confrontational during the FBI&#8217;s presentation, which community members complained was too focused on Islamic terrorist groups. Then, the agents showed a PowerPoint slide about state-sponsored terrorism that included a photograph of a man many in the audience believed was a Shia Islamic leader based on his clothes. Several people in the audience asked whether it was Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, a political and religious leader who led the 1979 Iranian Revolution and died in 1989.</p></blockquote>
<p>Yes, they were upset that possibly, a decapitating, castrating, woman stoning loon from Iran was being depicted as a terrorist. And&#8230;<i>too focused on terrorism.</i> No surprise, given that in a recent poll 92 percent of American Muslims opposed the tactics of al-Qaeda. Well, assuming that number is true, and there are over one million Muslims in the United States-do the math. That is a whole lot of hijackers.</p>
<p>I write this post as a reminder. We cannot forget who attacked us on 9-11. We cannot ignore that those same people are now assuming control in the Middle East-with the help of Barack Obama. We can&#8217;t forget about SQ 755 in Oklahoma, or the judge allowing sharia law in a Florida courtroom, or CAIR&#8217;s relentless attacks on U.S. companies, or Janet Napolitano&#8217;s security briefings to the same thugs that would destroy this country in a heartbeat. Don&#8217;t forget, because they certainly haven&#8217;t. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rjjrdq.com/2011/09/12/religion-of-peace-strikes-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Soils The Memory of 9-11</title>
		<link>http://rjjrdq.com/2011/09/10/obama-soils-the-memory-of-9-11/</link>
		<comments>http://rjjrdq.com/2011/09/10/obama-soils-the-memory-of-9-11/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Sep 2011 04:54:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rjjrdq</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[9-11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Islam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjjrdq.com/?p=4759</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I know that for many people, 9-11 is a time for reflection, to understand how our nation changed that day, and to remember those that perished. I don&#8217;t know about the rest of you, but that day is very hard for me to think about. Even now, if I see a program is going [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://rjjrdq.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/wtc.jpg"><img src="http://rjjrdq.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/wtc.jpg" alt="" title="wtc" width="248" height="183" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-4760" /></a>I know that for many people, 9-11 is a time for reflection, to understand how our nation changed that day, and to remember those that perished. I don&#8217;t know about the rest of you, but that day is very hard for me to think about. Even now, if I see a program is going to show clips of those planes-I turn it off. It affects me more than I would have believed that day. But I have to speak up when Barack Obama decides he wants to bastardize this day and turn it into a <i>citizen of the world</i>, Marxist lovey dovey day. 2012 can&#8217;t come fast enough.</p>
<p>Already, Obama has instructed diplomats around the world to refrain from using the term <i>Islamic extremists</i> when describing those that committed the most horrific terror attack ever on U.S. soil. Well, I&#8217;ll meet him half way. He can drop the extremist tag. I think what those terrorists were thinking is closer to mainstream in this current incarnation of Islam. Then he had the unmitigated gall to <del datetime="2011-09-11T05:00:49+00:00">suggest</del> state that 9-11 was not <i>just about us</i>, but an attack on the world.<span id="more-4759"></span></p>
<blockquote><p>But the message for agencies abroad is a bit more surprising: <del datetime="2011-09-11T04:45:23+00:00">suggesting</del> stating that the 9/11 anniversary is <a href="http://www.theatlanticwire.com/politics/2011/08/obama-administration-message-911-its-not-just-about-us/41877/" target="_blank">&#8220;not just about us,&#8221;</a> and that the global goodwill American enjoyed after the attacks turned into anger at post-attack policies like the war in Iraq.</p></blockquote>
<p>Now he <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/obama-urges-unity-9-11-anniversary-192336442.html" target="_blank">wants to turn 9-11</a> into a national day of service, somehow trying to tie Marxist <i>hi ho, hi ho,</i> in with the terror attacks.</p>
<blockquote><p>In an email to supporters, the president urged others to follow his lead. &#8220;With just a small act of service, or a simple act of kindness towards others, you can both honor those we lost and those who serve us still, and help us recapture the spirit of generosity and compassion that followed 9/11,&#8221; the president wrote.</p></blockquote>
<p>Do you not do that now? Do you not let someone in merging onto the freeway? I do. Do you not hold the door for someone following you into a store or place of business? I do. Small acts of kindness. I do that with no prodding at all from Barack Obama. Of course, leftists and union thugs are a different breed, so maybe he was talking specifically to them.</p>
<p>Remember, this is the guy that supports the victory mosque at ground zero. This is the guy, that gave his first interview as president to Al-Jazeera. This is the guy, who&#8217;s Homeland Security gives briefings to the same Muslim goons that would destroy this country. This is the guy who&#8217;s Justice Department blocked the FBI from presenting evidence in the Holyland Foundation case that would have eviscerated CAIR and the Muslim Brotherhood. This is a guy who claims to be hunting potential terrorists looking to attack on this anniversary, while at the same time leaving the border wide open, and even shipping weapons to those that would do us harm. This is a guy that ignored Congress and went full steam ahead in Libya, installing what what is now confirmed to be an al-Qaeda faction. The new head of security for the <i>rebels</i> has confirmed it. Well, Obama did say that al-Qaeda was becoming irrelevant. He fixed that in a hurry. If ever there was a more inappropriate person in the White House this day, it would be Barack Obama. The previously most inappropriate person is apparently dead.</p>
<p>I honor the memory of those lost on 9-11 in my own way. I don&#8217;t need the likes of Barack Obama telling me what I should be doing. Hey Barry, why don&#8217;t you show America a small act of kindness and stay away from New York on 9-11. That kind of service we can appreciate. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rjjrdq.com/2011/09/10/obama-soils-the-memory-of-9-11/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Michael Bloomberg Bans Clergy From 911 Memorial</title>
		<link>http://rjjrdq.com/2011/09/03/michael-bloomberg-bans-clergy-from-911-memorial/</link>
		<comments>http://rjjrdq.com/2011/09/03/michael-bloomberg-bans-clergy-from-911-memorial/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Sep 2011 06:58:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rjjrdq</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[911]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Islam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Muslim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjjrdq.com/?p=4741</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I talked the other day how Islam was reaching its tentacles into every facet of American society. Well, consider this yet another tentacle, and it&#8217;s going to hurt. It seems as though New York mayor Michael Bloomberg has banned clergy from the upcoming 911 memorial. Andre Carson must be clicking his heels from that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I talked the other day how Islam was reaching its tentacles into every facet of American society. Well, consider this yet another tentacle, and it&#8217;s going to hurt. It seems as though New York mayor Michael Bloomberg has <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/08/26/bloomberg-stands-by-decision-to-leave-out-clergy-at-11-ceremony/" target="_blank">banned clergy</a> from the upcoming 911 memorial. Andre Carson must be clicking his heels from that tree branch.<span id="more-4741"></span></p>
<p>Just over a year ago <a href="http://rjjrdq.com/2010/08/25/bloomberg-still-trying-to-hand-new-york-to-islam/" target="_blank">I wrote about</a> Bloomberg&#8217;s vociferous support of the ground zero victory mosque, just blocks from the scene of the worst terror attack in American history. Bloomberg has clearly surrendered to Islam, and he aims to force the rest of us to bow as he has. Not only will clergy be banned, but first responders, and even survivors from that fateful day will be banned. However, he has invited a representative from the Muslim community to take part in the ceremonies. <i>God</i> forbid a Muslim should have to suffer through a Christian prayer. Bloomberg has made sure that won&#8217;t happen. At the same time, he&#8217;s making sure America gets as much of the bomb vest brigade as they can handle.</p>
<p>Bloomberg&#8217;s argument is that there just isn&#8217;t enough room for <i>all those people.</i> That&#8217;s funny, for the past nine years there was plenty of room, but as the 10th anniversary approaches, suddenly there isn&#8217;t room.</p>
<p>As Bloomberg continues his dhimmi duties and trys to promote Islam as the religion of peace, the fact that United States is currently engaged in three wars against that same religon, and virtually every terror attack in the last 10 years has been committed by those in the name of Islam as well. A few extremists? If that&#8217;s the case, how is it that a <i>few</i> extremists can engage the greatest military in history for a decade with no end to the conflict in sight? In fact, if we look at the evidence, <i>we&#8217;re losing.</i> Iraq, Afghanistan and Libya are no better off than they were before. The minute we leave, those countries will devolve into the warring hell-holes that they have always been. The Arab spring? Here comes the new boss, same as the old boss. Here in America, we see sharia law in the courtrooms, the classrooms, we see it being forced on businesses, and now we get this.</p>
<p>Like the tea party attacks, this looks like a planned effort as well. Bloomberg is pulling this, while Obama is instructing diplomats abroad to refrain from using terms like <i>Muslim extremists.</i> He&#8217;s even re-written history by stating that 911 was an attack on the world. The U.N. wouldn&#8217;t have it any other way.</p>
<p>When we say <i>United States</i>, we certainly aren&#8217;t referring to the citizens. The divide between left and right is so vast, that there is little, if any chance of closing it. And every immigrant that crosses the border, and every indoctrinated student that graduates from most schools in this nation just widens that divide. Bloomberg was elected easily. What does that say? He&#8217;s only one guy, but it took many to put him where he is. Same with California. It&#8217;s just a handful in government, but it took many thousands to put them there. It is the left who&#8217;s numbers are set to grow. Where is the spring where conservative values can flourish? There is none. But every institution you can think of is full of either policy or law that promotes <i>diversity</i>, and <i>inclusion</i>. How&#8217;s that working out? Just ask Michael Bloomberg.</p>
<p>As far as the Judeo-Christian right is concerned in this country, the numbers only drop from here. Unless there is some kind of miracle change in thinking, this country is going to become borderless nightmare that succumbs to every foreign law and cultural calamity that is allowed in. It is us that capitulates, not them, not the ones that ran away from the cesspools they created. The United States will become like those cesspools. Of course at that point, we will only be the United States in name. And that&#8217;s the way dhimmis like Michael Bloomberg want it. One world, one law, and a smashmouth religion that&#8217;s all about control. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rjjrdq.com/2011/09/03/michael-bloomberg-bans-clergy-from-911-memorial/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>rjjrdq Linked to Oslo Massacre</title>
		<link>http://rjjrdq.com/2011/08/15/rjjrdq-linked-to-oslo-massacre/</link>
		<comments>http://rjjrdq.com/2011/08/15/rjjrdq-linked-to-oslo-massacre/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 02:47:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rjjrdq</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anders Breivik]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gates of Vienna]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rjjrdq]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjjrdq.com/?p=4690</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Remember a few months ago there was story about Barack Obama&#8217;s latest czar, Jesse Lee. A Dem troll that has done Internet work for the DNC and the &#8217;08 Obama campaign had been tapped to be the new Internet Czar, or Internet thug if you will. His job now is to go around and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remember a few months ago there was story about Barack Obama&#8217;s latest czar, Jesse Lee. A Dem troll that has done Internet work for the DNC and the &#8217;08 Obama campaign had been tapped to be the <a href="http://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/aubrey-vaughan/2011/05/24/white-house-creates-new-position-attack-administration-critics" target="_blank">new <i>Internet Czar</i></a>, or Internet thug if you will. His job now is to go around and find any negative stories about Obama and&#8230;well, we&#8217;re not sure exactly what he does then. Why do I bring this guy up? Could be a coincidence, but if he didn&#8217;t have a hand in this, then there are other trolls out there that are looking to demonize opponents of Obama.<span id="more-4690"></span></p>
<p>Just days after <a href="http://americaswatchtower.com/2011/07/29/media-matters-calls-americas-watchtower-a-pro-militia-website/" target="_blank"><i>America&#8217;s Watchtower</i></a> was branded a <i>militia</i> website by a left wing smear site, rjjrdq.com has been linked to the Oslo madman Anders Breivik, the mass murderer that killed scores of innocent people in Norway, apparently, out of frustration over the Islamization of Europe. Branded as <i>extreme right wing</i> by the media, anybody connected could be dangerous, as the <i>extreme</i> label would suggest. Well, make no mistake, I am frustrated over the Islamization of Europe, and the United States for that matter. But I digress.</p>
<p>Hats off to <a href="http://gatesofvienna.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">Dymphna</a> for bringing this to my attention. I don&#8217;t know who <a href="https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AojPWc7pGzlMdGtNNFc1V05TS0xoY1BQTEVnSEtUWXc&#038;hl=en_US#gid=0" target="_blank">posted this on Google docs</a>, but the list of links that allegedly connects these bloggers to Breivik is pretty extensive. I don&#8217;t know how they have that document set up either, because it&#8217;s almost impossible to search for anything. I found my link though. I downloaded and searched Breivik&#8217;s manifesto as well, wondering where I fit into his madness. As it turns out, I don&#8217;t think I do.</p>
<p>I highly recommend one of the links on my blogroll, <i><a href="http://gatesofvienna.blogspot.com/" target="_blank"> Gates of Vienna.</a></i> If you think Islam has gone wild in the U.S. (and it has), you haven&#8217;t checked out Europe. It looks like that site was referenced in the manifesto, and since I have that link on my site, suddenly, I become part of the <i>extreme</i> right wing. Now I&#8217;ve never seen anything on that site that even remotely suggested doing what the Oslo kook did, but somebody out there is shifting the blame away from that individual, and on to others, those that are taking a sane approach to issues like Islamization. Funny (or not) how this kind of thing goes on in the name of Islam <i>every day</i>, and the media hardly bats an eye. When whitey pulls a stunt like this, all of a sudden everybody is an extremist.</p>
<p>Well, the link stays on my blogroll, and whatever leftist crackpot that posted those links at Google docs can go to hell. I know it&#8217;s a leftist idiot, because as I said, they&#8217;re shifting the blame from the one responsible. Classic left wing thinking. Breivik was a lone nut. As far as I know he never visited my blog. But even if he did, I certainly don&#8217;t have some kind of magical power to drive this guy to murder. Somebody thinks I do though, and I wish they would come forward so I can set them straight. Or maybe they&#8217;re just scared that this right wing extremist might have a meltdown and do something terrible. Like uh, write a scathing blog post or something.</p>
<p>These could be low level attacks, goons off the street looking to make trouble, or&#8230;I can&#8217;t put anything past this regime. I don&#8217;t have any proof, so I won&#8217;t make the claim, but I won&#8217;t discount the possibility that these are coordinated attacks from the highest levels.</p>
<p>Our founding fathers were considered extremists and trouble makers as well. If somebody is going to <i>anonymously</i> categorize me, then that&#8217;s not bad company to be in. I&#8217;m sure those patriots were linked to heinous acts themselves. Keep putting it out there boys, the more people that come and read my blog, the stupider you&#8217;re going to look.</p>
<p>I just want to add, if there is anybody out there that has felt a need to kill something after visiting my blog, please let me know, and I&#8217;ll try to address that. I sure will. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rjjrdq.com/2011/08/15/rjjrdq-linked-to-oslo-massacre/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

