When Herman Cain stated that he would not have a Muslim in his administration, the Alinskyites and the rest of the MSM attacked him mercilessly. He currently tops the polls among GOP presidential contenders. He spoke the truth, and people liked what they heard. All except the dhimmis that bow to Islam and are like deer in the headlights facing the movement to Islamize the world. Not everyone is waiting for that to happen.

It was Joe Liberman that first voiced his outrage to the Obama regime’s plans to remove all references to Islamic terror and Islamic extremists from the national security lexicon. Basically any references that shed a negative light on Islam was to be removed from all documents. Now Michelle Bachmann is attempting to make the issue headline news, something it should have been all along. She accuses the Obama regime of succumbing to pressure from Islamic groups to remove the accurate language from national security documents.

“And now Obama is allowing terror suspect groups to write the FBI’s terror training manual,” she told about 75 Republican activists in an eastern Iowa hotel conference room.

I would go a step further and suggest that Obama is actually working with these groups to help the spread of sharia law on a global scale. He’s done a hell of a job in the Middle East and North Africa in that regard. Egypt, Tunisia, Libya, his willingness to bow to the Taliban in Afghanistan? I’ve made my case, and Michelle Bachmann has made hers.

Of course, the MSM has their own case. I’ve provided a link to an article because that’s where I saw Bachmann’s comments. The story itself…well, let’s say it deviates from what Bachmann actually said. Of course, it’s an AP article, and can be found from WaPo to ABC to the New York Times. Same article. It’s tough to find out what she actually said because the Web is flooded with this particular article, but based on the biased article, Bachmann’s comments were limited in scope and didn’t go far enough.

Okay, the FBI falls under the jurisdiction of the JD. But even then, WaPo AP couldn’t even cover for the FBI’s efforts to erase negative references to Islam. So what did they do? They changed the subject. They threw out a few numbers about the number of troops killed in Iraq that Bachmann got wrong. She does tend to get numbers wrong, and the MSM are waiting for it like raw meat. Of course, Bachmann knows the United States is 50 strong, not the 57 that Obama thinks.

Gaffes are gaffes, and facts are facts. That’s okay that the MSM will call out a candidate when they get something wrong. But when they use those gaffes to counter factual information, the kind that would damage the Obama regime, then it ceases to become news and becomes a political hit piece. Bachmann is right about this. Lieberman was right when he protested the moves, but AP has gone as far as saying Bachmann is exaggerating the directive. Lieberman didn’t think so, and neither do I. Obama is removing all references to Islamic extremism while promoting sharia law around the world. Can anybody dispute me on this? WaPo, AP, this is an open invitation. Send your best goons over. I’ll debate you on this. Better yet, go debate Bachmann, or even Joe Lieberman. I didn’t think so. Standing offer though.

Already, Obama has instructed diplomats around the world to refrain from using the term Islamic extremists when describing those that committed the most horrific terror attack ever on U.S. soil. Well, I’ll meet him half way. He can drop the extremist tag. I think what those terrorists were thinking is closer to mainstream in this current incarnation of Islam. Then he had the unmitigated gall to suggest state that 9-11 was not just about us, but an attack on the world.

But the message for agencies abroad is a bit more surprising: suggesting stating that the 9/11 anniversary is “not just about us,” and that the global goodwill American enjoyed after the attacks turned into anger at post-attack policies like the war in Iraq.

Now he wants to turn 9-11 into a national day of service, somehow trying to tie Marxist hi ho, hi ho, in with the terror attacks.

In an email to supporters, the president urged others to follow his lead. “With just a small act of service, or a simple act of kindness towards others, you can both honor those we lost and those who serve us still, and help us recapture the spirit of generosity and compassion that followed 9/11,” the president wrote.

Do you not do that now? Do you not let someone in merging onto the freeway? I do. Do you not hold the door for someone following you into a store or place of business? I do. Small acts of kindness. I do that with no prodding at all from Barack Obama. Of course, leftists and union thugs are a different breed, so maybe he was talking specifically to them.

Remember, this is the guy that supports the victory mosque at ground zero. This is the guy, that gave his first interview as president to Al-Jazeera. This is the guy, who’s Homeland Security gives briefings to the same Muslim goons that would destroy this country. This is the guy who’s Justice Department blocked the FBI from presenting evidence in the Holyland Foundation case that would have eviscerated CAIR and the Muslim Brotherhood. This is a guy who claims to be hunting potential terrorists looking to attack on this anniversary, while at the same time leaving the border wide open, and even shipping weapons to those that would do us harm. This is a guy that ignored Congress and went full steam ahead in Libya, installing what what is now confirmed to be an al-Qaeda faction. The new head of security for the rebels has confirmed it. Well, Obama did say that al-Qaeda was becoming irrelevant. He fixed that in a hurry. If ever there was a more inappropriate person in the White House this day, it would be Barack Obama. The previously most inappropriate person is apparently dead.

I honor the memory of those lost on 9-11 in my own way. I don’t need the likes of Barack Obama telling me what I should be doing. Hey Barry, why don’t you show America a small act of kindness and stay away from New York on 9-11. That kind of service we can appreciate.

Just days after America’s Watchtower was branded a militia website by a left wing smear site, rjjrdq.com has been linked to the Oslo madman Anders Breivik, the mass murderer that killed scores of innocent people in Norway, apparently, out of frustration over the Islamization of Europe. Branded as extreme right wing by the media, anybody connected could be dangerous, as the extreme label would suggest. Well, make no mistake, I am frustrated over the Islamization of Europe, and the United States for that matter. But I digress.

Hats off to Dymphna for bringing this to my attention. I don’t know who posted this on Google docs, but the list of links that allegedly connects these bloggers to Breivik is pretty extensive. I don’t know how they have that document set up either, because it’s almost impossible to search for anything. I found my link though. I downloaded and searched Breivik’s manifesto as well, wondering where I fit into his madness. As it turns out, I don’t think I do.

I highly recommend one of the links on my blogroll, Gates of Vienna. If you think Islam has gone wild in the U.S. (and it has), you haven’t checked out Europe. It looks like that site was referenced in the manifesto, and since I have that link on my site, suddenly, I become part of the extreme right wing. Now I’ve never seen anything on that site that even remotely suggested doing what the Oslo kook did, but somebody out there is shifting the blame away from that individual, and on to others, those that are taking a sane approach to issues like Islamization. Funny (or not) how this kind of thing goes on in the name of Islam every day, and the media hardly bats an eye. When whitey pulls a stunt like this, all of a sudden everybody is an extremist.

Well, the link stays on my blogroll, and whatever leftist crackpot that posted those links at Google docs can go to hell. I know it’s a leftist idiot, because as I said, they’re shifting the blame from the one responsible. Classic left wing thinking. Breivik was a lone nut. As far as I know he never visited my blog. But even if he did, I certainly don’t have some kind of magical power to drive this guy to murder. Somebody thinks I do though, and I wish they would come forward so I can set them straight. Or maybe they’re just scared that this right wing extremist might have a meltdown and do something terrible. Like uh, write a scathing blog post or something.

These could be low level attacks, goons off the street looking to make trouble, or…I can’t put anything past this regime. I don’t have any proof, so I won’t make the claim, but I won’t discount the possibility that these are coordinated attacks from the highest levels.

Our founding fathers were considered extremists and trouble makers as well. If somebody is going to anonymously categorize me, then that’s not bad company to be in. I’m sure those patriots were linked to heinous acts themselves. Keep putting it out there boys, the more people that come and read my blog, the stupider you’re going to look.

I just want to add, if there is anybody out there that has felt a need to kill something after visiting my blog, please let me know, and I’ll try to address that. I sure will.

Pfc. Naser Jason Abdo, yet another Muslim soldier that had a problem with the United States was arrested after plotting to bomb a restaurant near Ft. Hood Texas, the site of another terror attack just two years ago. Abdo, a Muslim and a conscientious objector was AWOL from the Army, set to stand trial for possessing child pornography. He was set to be dischared in May, until the pornography charges came along.

Not so coincidentally, his Jordanian father was arrested in a sting several years ago. He tried to solicit sex from a cop posing as an underaged girl. After his jail stint he was deported. Now this. Like father, like son.

Abdo had all the materials he needed to make a few bombs that would have caused severe damage. The only thing that thwarted the attack was a gun store owner calling the cops. He just thought Abdo was suspicious, and reported him, largely based on the kinds of materials he was buying. If not for that, those attacks would surely have happened, by Abdo’s own admission.

What’s is going to take? The Army didn’t consider Abdo a threat of any kind. Until the porn charges, they were just going to grant him a discharge in respect to his Muslim view that he could not kill another Muslim. Well, you can just pick up any paper and realize what a bunch of crap that is. Muslims kill eachother even more than they kill infidels. So the line that he couldn’t whack another Muslim should have raised alarm bells. It did not.

How many more Abdo’s are out there? When will the Army realize that this is the enemy? It is the Abdo’s of the world. This guy was caught by pure luck. With our open borders you can be sure that there are professional terrorists trolling this country that will be much more careful than Abdo was. How much longer can we depend on dumb luck?

As you know, I believe OBL was killed in Afghanistan years ago. Using intelligence gathered from the comfort of my home, that was the conclusion I came to. I may be wrong, but it seems very plausible. Then we had the raid of May 1. The official story was that Navy SEALs stormed Bin Laden’s safe house and put two into his skull. Great. Let’s see it. America wants closure on this. America needs closure. Anyone alive that day in 2001 will have those images seared into their minds forever. I have a hard time looking at those images even today. If indeed Bin Laden was killed Sunday, I need to see it. Millions of Americans need to see it and thus close that chapter in life that has gone on way too long. Barack Obama has decided that we’ll just have to keep on waiting.

The White House has decided that no photographs-or video will be released of not only the raid, but the alleged burial at sea. Citing national security concerns, apparently Obama is worried about pissing off jihadists around the world. He wasn’t worried about that when he announced to the world that it was he that got Bin Laden. But to actually provide some kind of evidence would prove to be problem to him.

Maybe they’re waiting to get their story straight. Bin Laden was armed, then he wasn’t. He resisted, then he didn’t. He used a human sheild, then he didn’t. His wife was killed, then she wasn’t. They did watch the video, didn’t they? They did debrief those SEALs, didn’t they?

In the meantime, we are right back to where we started. The only proof this actually occurred is from Barack Obama himself. We can only assume he’s telling the truth in the absence of any evidence that this actually occurred. I’m not saying it didn’t. I have my doubts-serious doubts, but I’m leaving the door open to the possibility that I’m wrong. The actions of the White House just bolster my case though. Since when does Obama have national security concerns? I’ve detailed just the opposite on this blog. Now all of a sudden he has concerns?

If there is photographic evidence of what Obama is claiming, don’t be surprised to have it leaked some time next year. Especially if it looks like he’s going down to defeat. For now though, all we have is his word, which to me isn’t worth five cents.

Over the years there have been many fake tapes, videos and accounts of Osama’s death. One of the more famous was the confession tape, where Bin Laden was rejoicing over the fall of the twin towers. Upon further examination though, the figure in the video was not public enemy no. 1. We’ve seen the fake death photos. As fake as the audio tapes that supposedly came from him. Where are the videos? Where are the photos? There are none after 2001. Dead men don’t pose well. A quick Google search will bring up thousands of hits on fake Bin Laden stories.

Now we have the latest. Navy SEALs assaulted his compound and took him down. Awesome story. SEAL team 6 is as bad as they come. And when I say bad, I mean good. They are the bad asses among other bad asses. If indeed they did go to Pakistan and put two in Bin Laden’s head, I’ll be at the head of the line celebrating. I’ll be happy to admit I was wrong and that I fell for a nutty conspiracy story. So far, all we have is the word of the Obama regime.

I’ll just throw some issues out there that I have. Again, if I’m wrong, I have no problem admitting it. After all, I don’t have access to national security information. Obama does. First of all, there were apparently not only photos, but full video of the raid. Where is it? The Obama regime can’t decide if they want to release what they have. Remember that Saddam Hussein, along with his sons were laid out like a buffet. There was no doubt. So far, we have only Obama’s word. And now we find out that by the time we got the story, Bin Laden had been taken out to sea, given full Islamic burial rites, and was given a sea burial normally reserved for the bravest of our fighting sailors. Yes, the body is gone, and now we have to depend completely on the Obama regime to verify if in fact Bin Laden was killed yesterday.

This might be a coincidence, but it seems like quite a conicidence that this comes as Obama’s poll numbers are sagging-even among his supporters, there’s grousing about a third war he has gotten us into, gas is heading towards $5 a gallon, the job situation remains gloomy, and the November shellacking is still fresh on his mind. He may need more than a little sympathy on the upcoming budget battle as well. He may get it now.

Add to that his approach to Islam in general. Even foreign dignitaries have pegged him as Muslim, he’s stocked the Justice Department with terror sympathizers, many of whom actually defended terror suspects in court, has banned the term Islamic extremists from the national security lexicon, has a Homeland Security apparatus that is briefing the very elements that would harm this country on sensitive security matters, blocked prosecution of terror conspirators CAIR, foot dragged his way through the Ft. Hood massacre investigation-and the list goes on. What allegedly happened May 1, 2011 is totally out of character for Obama.

Yes, I could be wrong. Obama may be willing to have his hand bitten while reaching out to Muslims. He may actually believe that Islam can co-exist with the West. He may see Bin Laden as a hindrance, not a benefit to the implementation of sharia law in the United States. From that point of view, he very well could have ordered the hit. But we’re talking about Barack Obama here. I need the proof. It seems as though many Americans are taking the story at face value, and I would love to as well, but Obama can’t be trusted. For me, Obama put himself in this position. The lying, the covering up, the obfuscation, the back room dealings…now all of a sudden we’re supposed to take this story as is? Not me. Show me the proof. And if that proof happens to be a photo that is as badly photoshopped as his birth certificate, then this will be one more sack of crap from Obama, true to form.

Rep. Peter King, fresh off his failed hearings last month on radical Islam, is trying to make up for that fiasco by putting Eric Holder on the hot seat yet again. He fired off a letter to the insane clown Attorney General and is asking why CAIR didn’t go down along with the fall guys.

I have been reliably informed that the decision not to seek indictments of the Council on American Islamic Relations (“CAIR”) and its co-founder Omar Ahmad, the Islamic Society of North America (“ISNA”), and the North American Islamic Trust (“NAIT”), was usurped by high-ranking officials at Department of Justice headquarters over the vehement and stated objections of special agents and supervisors of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, as well as the prosecutors at the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Dallas, who had investigated and successfully prosecuted the Holy Land Foundation case. Their opposition to this decision raises serious doubt that the decision not to prosecute was a valid exercise of prosecutorial discretion.

Yes, the feds were salivating at the opportunity to take down CAIR-and thus their network of sharia apostles in the United States. You can look up the activities of CAIR on this site and many others. In my opinion, they are much more effective than any suicide bomber could be, although, with this revelation, bloody terror attacks are also a tool in their jihadist arsenal.

Once again, we have an out of control Justice Department on the wrong side of the law. They dropped charges against the club wielding Black Panthers after they intimidated voters at a Philadelphia polling place. They’ve attacked Arizona for daring to pass SB 1070. They’ve authorized gun running to Mexican drug cartels. They forced police departments to dumb down their recruitment requirements. They’ve sued a school district for not bowing to Islamic law and allowing a teacher to walk out in the middle of a semester in order to skulk to Mecca. They have as policy no civil rights protection for whites. I could go on all night.

This is beyond buffoonery. This is actively supporting terrorists. Holder should be jailed. We can be pretty sure that his Muslim boss is well aware of all of this too. There needs to be more than a letter though. This is the stuff of jail time. This is impeachment material. Man, how many times have I said those things? We’ve seen many an administration engage in questionable, maybe even illegal behavior, but have you ever seen an administration that was so blatantly criminal? Go get them Peter, and if John Boehner gets in your way just punch him in the mouth. I’m done playing nice. Time to hold their feet to the fire. It’s no cliche’ to say it’s gotten out of control.

Why we even have a Director of National Intelligence is anybody’s guess, and Clapper certainly makes the case why we should not have one. As you recall, it was Diane Sawyer who dismantled Clapper back in December when she asked him about a raid in the U.K. that netted 12 terrorists. Clapper was completely unaware of the headline news of the day. Classic video. You won’t know whether to laugh or cry though. Remember, Director of National Intelligence. Clapper has clapped off once again, this time during a hearing on Capital Hill. He has characterized the Muslim Brotherhood as some happy, fluffy folks that just want democracy in Egypt.

“The term ‘Muslim Brotherhood’ … is an umbrella term for a variety of movements, in the case of Egypt, a very heterogeneous group, largely secular, which has eschewed violence and has decried Al Qaeda as a perversion of Islam,” Clapper said.

Yes, he did. Largely secular. That “umbrella” this idiot refers to includes the likes of HAMAS and al-qaeda. Even the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt has already called for revisiting the peace treaty with Israel. Their stated goal-to this very moment is for global Islamic supremacy.

“Allah is our objective. The Prophet is our leader. Qur’an is our law. Jihad is our way. Dying in the way of Allah is our highest hope.”

That is their mission statement. But Clapper thinks they’re secular and that they denounce violence. Check out sharia law Clapper. They aren’t denouncing anything of the sort.

How Barack Obama can stand up to the country with a straight face and talk about any semblance of national security admittedly takes some skill. The cartoons he has installed in the most critical positions must have terrorists laughing in their caves. Both Clapper and Napolitano must have some mental issues. Neither seem to show any sign of intelligence or common sense. I’ve asked this before. How can someone so bumbling, so idiotic, so incredibly unqualified reach such a position in life? This guy holds the security of 300 million people in his hands. How could that happen?

With 2012 coming up fast, this guy may be too much of a liability. Surely there’s discussion now on how to dump this guy and stop the political bleeding. It’s too late though. Many of us already knew what a joke national security was in this country. Now the rest of the country knows. When even MSNBC balks at Clapper’s ineptitude, you know he was a bad pick. Of course, if Clapper does indeed get thrown under the bus, you can be sure that the next pick will be no better. After all, Obama still thinks Janet Napolitano is just peachy.

If you were a one issue voter (and there are many), this one alone should give cause to vote for somebody else in 2012. Until then, clap off Barry, clap off.