<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>rjjrdq&#039;s America II</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rjjrdq.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rjjrdq.com</link>
	<description>Still good, still bad, and still absurd...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 03:58:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>LAUSD Violating Civil Rights Of Illegal Aliens?</title>
		<link>http://rjjrdq.com/2010/03/10/lausd-violating-civil-rights-of-illegal-aliens/</link>
		<comments>http://rjjrdq.com/2010/03/10/lausd-violating-civil-rights-of-illegal-aliens/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 03:52:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rjjrdq</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Los Angeles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[illegal aliens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Los Angeles Unified School District]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjjrdq.com/?p=2740</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve said before that remedies for discrimination usually involve discrimination against someone  or something else to rectify the problem. I couldn&#8217;t have come up with a better example if I&#8217;d  made it up. Don&#8217;t look for any content of your character here.</p>
<p>In a move that the Mexican government itself couldn&#8217;t have imagined, the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve said before that remedies for discrimination usually involve discrimination against someone  or something else to rectify the problem. I couldn&#8217;t have come up with a better example if I&#8217;d  made it up. Don&#8217;t look for any <i>content of your character</i> here.</p>
<p>In a move that the Mexican government itself couldn&#8217;t have imagined, the <i>feds</i>, courtesy of  the Department of Education are <a  href="http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-lausd10-2010mar10,0,5349677.story?track=rss"  target="_blank">launching an investigation</a> regarding allegations the the Los Angeles Unified  School District <i>violated the civil rights</i> of English language learners. You heard that  right, the LAUSD is going to be hammered for not pandering enough to illegal alien students-at  the expense of everybody else.</p>
<p>Citing poor test scores of blacks and Latinos, the DOE  suspects that not enough resources are being diverted away from whites and Asians to bring the  former up to speed. Funny, <i>it was they</i> who included blacks as English learners.</p>
<blockquote><p>Federal analysts will review how English learners are identified and when they are judged fluent  enough to handle regular course work. They&#8217;ll examine whether English learners have qualified,  appropriately trained teachers. And they&#8217;ll look at how teachers make math and science  understandable for students with limited English.</p></blockquote>
<p>What if they aren&#8217;t fluent enough? If  they can&#8217;t speak English, then it&#8217;s up to the parents (many of who do not speak English either)  to get those kids in an English immersion class so <i>they can</i> handle regular course work. It  isn&#8217;t the responsibility for the LAUSD to educate Mexican children. And lets face it folks, this  is L.A.; that&#8217;s exactly who we&#8217;re talking about. And what do they mean when they say <i>make math and science understandable</i>? That&#8217;s code for <i>dumb it down.</I> Barry can talk about education and math and science all he wants. This is what <i>he&#8217;s actually doing</i> about it.</p>
<p>The DOE is targeting schools on the West  side of the San Fernando Valley. Anyone who lives in the area knows that the East side is mostly  Latino, and what whites and Asians are left in the valley tend to be on the West side. Those are  the schools they&#8217;re going after. Those are the ones with the biggest disparity in success rates  between races. Yes, it&#8217;s all about <i>la raza.</i>What they&#8217;re looking to do is divert resources  away from kids that actually can speak English and divert them to the illegal alien kids. And  who&#8217;s civil rights are being violated there? As it is, English speaking kids are forced to slow  down and hang back while the slower English learners try to catch up.</p>
<p>And if the dropout  numbers are any indicator, they tend not to catch up. But those aren&#8217;t just English learners.  Latinos and blacks (sorry, if you&#8217;re from Africa my apologies, but most black Americans <i>are  not</i>) as a whole have a high dropout rate, English or no English. How do they explain  that?</p>
<p>I remember <i>Bill O&#8217;Reilly</i> had a guest on his show and they discussed this very  issue, but it was regarding the black community. According to his guest, to fly right and do well  in school was tantamount to <i>acting white</i>, and the peer pressure to be just the opposite  was a prime reason for the high dropout rates in the black community. That may be the case among  Latinos as well, but there is the language factor. I remember seeing an interview with Fernando  Valenzuela, the former Dodger great, who as a player, didn&#8217;t speak English. He now calls games  for the Dodger&#8217;s Spanish audience, but now, <i>he does speak English.</I> When asked how long it  took him learn the language, he said <i>about a year.</i> I&#8217;m sure he wasn&#8217;t a Rhodes scholar by  then but he did speak the language. The illegal alien kids can&#8217;t take a year out and learn the  language? Better yet, they can&#8217;t go home to their native country and get an education there, and  do some good for their country?</p>
<p>No. Instead, border crossers dump their kids into  Americans schools and expect the United States to not only educate the kids, but pay for to  boot.</p>
<p>The LAUSD is about to layoff another 4000 employees. Surely teachers will be in that  mix. What resources do they have to teach non-English speaking kids? The official numbers are  about 1/3 are in this category, but anyone living here knows that the number of English deficient  kids in the LAUSD is <i>much higher</i>. They just don&#8217;t have the resources to pander to them.  And we&#8217;re talking about the most welcoming defacto Mexican school district in the country. If  they can&#8217;t do it, imagine the rest of the country. Make no mistake about it; the LAUSD sucks, but the feds are focusing on ramping up the crown jewel of their self-destruction. </p>
<p>They better find a way to keep it going though. 1/4 of  their budget comes from the Feds and they risk it all if they don&#8217;t steal from Peter to pay Paul.  LAUSD, a corrupt, poorly run defacto Mexican district is in flames, and this just might finish  them off. If you have kids in school, don&#8217;t get too comfortable. If the feds can pull this on the  LAUSD, imagine what they can do in a town near you. Another stake going in the ground in  preparation for the amnesty wave. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rjjrdq.com/2010/03/10/lausd-violating-civil-rights-of-illegal-aliens/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Portrait Of A RINO</title>
		<link>http://rjjrdq.com/2010/03/09/portrait-of-a-rino/</link>
		<comments>http://rjjrdq.com/2010/03/09/portrait-of-a-rino/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 04:23:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rjjrdq</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amnesty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chuck Schumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lindsey Graham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjjrdq.com/?p=2736</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>We need to clean all the riff-raff out in November. That includes RINO&#8217;s who have the gall to consider themselves conservative. If you think John McCain is a Democrat in disguise, meet Lindsey Graham.</p>
<p>They call him Lindsey grahamnesty Graham, a champion of open borders to the point that he was willing to tell us bigots, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We need to clean all the riff-raff out in November. That includes RINO&#8217;s who have the gall to consider themselves conservative. If you think John McCain is a Democrat in disguise, meet Lindsey Graham.</p>
<p>They call him Lindsey <i>grahamnesty</i> Graham, a champion of open borders to the point that he was willing to tell us <i>bigots</i>, who wanted something as crazy as border security and no amnesty to <i>shut up.</i> Of course he was speaking to his pals from the National Council of La Raza, one of the most racist, anti-American groups being funded by our tax dollars today. They&#8217;re all right with Graham though. In fact, he&#8217;s so on board with the amnesty agenda, that <a href="http://michellemalkin.com/2010/03/05/lindsey-grahamnesty-rides-again/" target="_blank">Barack Obama himself has asked him</a> and another open borders goon, Chuck Shumer on the Democrat side, to come up with amnesty legislation to ram down the throats of America, in much the same fashion as the health care bill. Well, we know that Obamacare has nothing to do with health care and everything to do with taking control of a huge chunk of the economy, and we also know that amnesty has nothing to do with bringing illegal aliens <i>out of the shadows</i> and everything to do with erasing the borders, and thus, the United States. Graham would be happy to help.</p>
<p><a href="/2009/12/20/amnesty-bill-guts-virtually-all-immigration-enforcement/" target="_blank">The house already has H.R. 4321</a>, an all encompassing amnesty, that not only grants citizenship to every law breaker that ever crossed the border, but guts immigration enforcement to the point where there would be no real need for the border patrol. There would realistically be no border under Gutierrez&#8217; bill. Not doubt Graham and Schumer would come up with something similar. Remember, <a href="/2009/06/21/chuck-schumer-admits-1986-amnesty-was-a-failure/" target="_blank">Schumer is one of the architects of the 1986 amnesty</a> disaster that not only was riddled with fraud, but accelerated illegal immigration. We now have a disaster of such proportions that some states, like California, are all but lost. Illegal aliens and their anchor babies are tearing the state to pieces, and the politicians in Sacramento are facilitating the demise of a once great state.</p>
<p>Now Barack Obama wants to do to the rest of the country what happened to California; make it a defacto Mexican state, complete with crooked politicians, drug gangs, economy draining entitlement cases and a culture that is foreign to America in more ways than one. It doesn&#8217;t matter to Graham and Schumer if illegal immigration is destroying Mexico at the same time it is destroying the United States. If an amesty bill gets through, we&#8217;ll all be one country. Talk about a spike in unemployment. Somebody has to fund those entitlement programs. How much money do you have left?</p>
<p>That isn&#8217;t RINO Graham&#8217;s concern. He wants those borders open. Why is another question. Who the hell knows what he&#8217;s thinking. His radicalism doesn&#8217;t stop there though. He&#8217;s a cap and trade man. Yes he is. He&#8217;s the one that <a href="/2009/12/12/global-warming-fraud-goes-bi-partisan/" target="_blank">got together with Democrats</a> to propose <i>global warming</i> legislation in the senate. Yes, even after being exposed for the fraud that it is, Graham in true Dem socialist style is still pushing it. He also wants to close Gitmo, and is helping on that front too. Not sure how much clout he has there, but <i>it&#8217;s the thought</i> that counts.</p>
<p>This guy is a Dem. Don&#8217;t be fooled. He&#8217;s as bad as Dede Scozzafava ever was. And if there is one Republican that needs to hang it up, it&#8217;s Lindsey Graham. Yes, there are more, but this clown is a glaring example of what&#8217;s wrong with the GOP. How much do you want to bet Steele and the gang are throwing their support behind him? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rjjrdq.com/2010/03/09/portrait-of-a-rino/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bumbling Republicans Stumble Towards November</title>
		<link>http://rjjrdq.com/2010/03/08/bumbling-republicans-stumble-towards-november/</link>
		<comments>http://rjjrdq.com/2010/03/08/bumbling-republicans-stumble-towards-november/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 04:29:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rjjrdq</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dede Scozzafava]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doug Hoffman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Walsh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Melissa Bean]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newt Gingrich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RINO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roland Burris]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjjrdq.com/?p=2728</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Just because the Democrats will be feeling some serious pain in November doesn&#8217;t mean  America is out out the woods. We still have to deal with the Republicans. There was a reason the Republicans have been so unpopular the last several years (Bush was but one of reasons), and here is yet another example [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just because the Democrats will be feeling some serious pain in November doesn&#8217;t mean  America is out out the woods. We still have to deal with the Republicans. There was a reason the Republicans have been so unpopular the last several years (Bush was but one of reasons), and here is yet another example of a losing strategy.</p>
<p>The elections coming in November could see a swing to the right in the state of Illinois, the <i>home turf</i> of one the most brazen Marxists ever to be escorted up the political ladder. Barack Obama&#8217;s former seat will be up for grabs, and the guy who bought that seat, Roland Burris has indicated that he won&#8217;t even waste his time running again. The door is wide open to deliver a blow to Karl Marx if only the GOP can pull their head out of their ass long enough to make it happen.</p>
<p>They couldn&#8217;t do it in New York, where conservative Doug Hoffman was not only ostracized by the GOP <i>elites</i> but was actually undermined when the establishment-the same establishment that was voted out of power in disgrace, supported Dede Scozzafava, who we now know is a raging Democrat. GOP <i>luminaries</i> such as <a href="/2009/11/15/newt-gingrich-becoming-irrelevant/" target="_blank">Newt Gingrich</a>, in his support for RINO Scozzafava went so far as to say that the <i>tea party</i> movement could destroy the GOP. You could laugh off the ramblings of this has-been, but he&#8217;s actually hinted at a run in 2012. That&#8217;s right, the guy who couldn&#8217;t keep his pants on any more than Mark Sanford could (yet another GOP 2012 prospect) may actually run for the presidency in 2012. Do you want Obama for another 4 years? </p>
<p>The GOP is at it again, this time in Illinois, where the door is <i>open</i> for the Republicans. They&#8217;re doing everything they can to slam it shut again. In the 8th congressional district Republican primary last month, Joe Walsh, a candidate not unlike <a href="/2010/01/19/brown-pounds-coakley/" target="_blank">Scott Brown of Massachusetts</a> won the primary <a href="http://www.patriotroom.com/article/rnc-heading-for-cliff-refuse-to-back-tea-party-candidate-that-won-repub-primary" target="_blank">defeating the candidates</a> that the Republican National Committee were promoting. And, like Scott Brown, Walsh is getting no support from the GOP. No, they wanted their candidates (a few which I have already described), and when they couldn&#8217;t get it, they decided to move on. Walsh is on his own in his quest to unseat 3-time Democrat Melissa Bean. Brown was on his own and he made not only the socialist Dems look like fools, but the Republican establishment as well. Now it&#8217;s Walsh&#8217;s turn, and the dirt flinging has started already. Remember, like Scott Brown, Walsh has two parties that want to see him fail; the opposition Dems, and the indignant Republicans, who Walsh dared to not only take on, but defeated.</p>
<p>Who threw the story out there is unknown but the timing is strange, seeing as apparently <i>nobody</i> knew about this until after the primary was a done deal. It seems that Walsh lost his condo to foreclosure last year. Yeah, so did millions of others. All of a sudden this has become a story. They say that Walsh should have made this public. Not sure what the controversy is. Is anyone suggesting that Walsh allowed himself to be foreclosed on purpose? The man lost his home. All the more reason to elect him, because the ones who are there now aren&#8217;t doing a damn thing about the housing crisis. Let me rephrase that: they aren&#8217;t doing anything constructive about it. We all know what they did to help it along. Google Democrats and Fannie Mae and see what you come up with. Google Rahm Emanuel and Freddie Mac and take a look. Hell, search rjjrdq 1 &#038; 2 and find that stuff.</p>
<p> If we put our eggs in the proverbial GOP basket we may be looking at more years of lost opportunities and blundering politicians. Yes, they are the lesser of two evils, but why settle for that? You know, Newt may have been right. The tea party movement just might destroy the GOP, and I think long term that could be a good thing. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rjjrdq.com/2010/03/08/bumbling-republicans-stumble-towards-november/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New York In Political Flames</title>
		<link>http://rjjrdq.com/2010/03/06/new-york-in-political-flames/</link>
		<comments>http://rjjrdq.com/2010/03/06/new-york-in-political-flames/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 06:44:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rjjrdq</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Patterson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doug Hoffman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elliot Spitzer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric Massa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjjrdq.com/?p=2723</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Quite a state you have there, New Yorkers. But don&#8217;t feel alone. All states have their share of scumbags. You just have more media to shine the light on these cockroaches.</p>
<p>Can we say that New York has just had a run of bad luck, or have just made a series of bad choices? How about [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quite a state you have there, New Yorkers. But don&#8217;t feel alone. All states have their share of scumbags. You just have more media to shine the light on these cockroaches.</p>
<p>Can we say that New York has just had a run of bad luck, or have just made a series of bad choices? How about a combination of the two? Going back to when New Yorkers elected Hillary Clinton of <i>Arkansas</i> as their senator, only to have her bolt when <a href="http://gawker.com/5101335/clinton-ineligible-for-secretary-of-state" target="_blank">she got the gig illegally</a> as <i>secretary of state</i>. The <i>Constitution</i> expressly forbids the senator from taking the SOS position if the pay was increased while she was senator. Indeed, the pay was increased during her time in office. Basically, she can&#8217;t quit as senator and be appointed to a higher paying position, which is <i>exactly</i> what she did. Yes, she gave the finger to New Yorkers <i>and</i> the Constitution at the same time.</p>
<p>But the carnival of corruption didn&#8217;t stop there. New Yorkers also elected former NY attorney general Elloit Spitzer as governor. Tough as nails and take no prisoners with white collar thugs was the mantra of Spitzer, and New Yorkers liked what they saw. Unfortunately, Spitzer liked what he saw too, and went after it. <i>Hookergate</i> was his downfall, yet another politician that couldn&#8217;t keep it in his pants. But Spitzer couldn&#8217;t just go out and find a girlfriend on the side. No, he wanted his favorite hooker, and ultimately, it blew up in his face, and he resigned. That&#8217;s okay, because the <i>madam</i> that supplied Spitzer&#8217;s hooker is now running for governor herself! I suppose you could make this up, but in this case, it&#8217;s all true.</p>
<p>After Spitzer was tossed out, he was replaced by what seemed to be a perfect politically correct tokenization by the Democrat run legislature in New York. What could be more perfect than a blind <i>African-American?</I> I say African-American, but as far as I know, he&#8217;s <i>never</i> been to Africa. Turns out that this guy is a <a href="http://rjjrdq.wordpress.com/2009/05/02/new-york-state-settles-suit-for-racist-governor/" target="_blank">racist piece of garbage</a>, but on the positive side, he knows how to take care of his friends. One of those friends just happened to sexually harass a woman, and the governor went out of his way to pressure the woman to drop the accusation. Dave was caught pulling this stunt, but unlike Spitzer, has refused to resign. However, <a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/ny_local/2010/03/06/2010-03-06_team_patersons_key_players_starting_to_bail_out.html" target="_blank">some of his top aides have run screaming</a> from his administration. And if their comments are any indicator, he&#8217;s as guilty as they come.</p>
<blockquote><p>Communications Director Peter Kauffmann bolted Thursday, saying he could not remain at his job in &#8220;good conscience.&#8221;</p>
<p>Denise O&#8217;Donnell, the governor&#8217;s public safety czar, abruptly quit in disgust, and State Police Superintendent Harry Corbitt retired rather ride out the firestorm sparked when Paterson and his security detail contacted a domestic violence victim.</p></blockquote>
<p>You would think that most people would hang it up when even the people around you <i>just can&#8217;t take it.</I> The toxic Patterson is hanging on for now, despite numerous calls for resignation, including from the White House. You know, if Obama thinks you&#8217;re toxic, then it&#8217;s really time to go.</p>
<p>We don&#8217;t need to rehash the entire NY23rd District debacle, where RINO Dede Scozzafava turned out to be a Democrat, and even supported the candidate the admitted he was a Dem, over Doug Hoffman, citizen candidate who <i>should have</I> won that election. Well, all states have their share of <a href="/2009/11/21/ny-23rd-district-election-was-rigged/" target="_blank">voting machine trouble</a>.</p>
<p>As if New Yorkers hadn&#8217;t gotten enough drama from their elected officials, enter Eric Massa, who couldn&#8217;t even finish a single term <a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/news/2010/03/06/2010-03-06_upstate_dem_quits_house_in_sex_scandal.html" target="_blank">before resigning</a>. Apparently, he tried to nail a male staffer, but was obviously rejected. The incident sparked a house ethics investigation, but instead of becoming another Elliot Spitzer, Massa has decided to quit. <i>You&#8217;re sleeping on the couch tonight, Eric.</I> It remains to be seen if his family sticks by him. We can only speculate that this has never happened before. Yeah.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s next for New York? Who knows, but maybe after November New Yorkers will have finally gotten a clue and will install representatives that are shall we say, <i>less controversial?</i> If they can at least get Hoffman elected in NY23 that would be a start.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rjjrdq.com/2010/03/06/new-york-in-political-flames/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mass Spam Attack</title>
		<link>http://rjjrdq.com/2010/03/05/mass-spam-attack/</link>
		<comments>http://rjjrdq.com/2010/03/05/mass-spam-attack/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 07:43:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[WordPress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjjrdq.com/?p=2720</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Not sure how to handle this, since I&#8217;ve never faced anything on this scale. Over 1000 spam hits-most have ended up in the spam folder, but the sheer volume is concerning. Bear with me while I work with my web host to deal with this problem. In the meantime, the blogroll on the side has [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure how to handle this, since I&#8217;ve never faced anything on this scale. Over 1000 spam hits-most have ended up in the spam folder, but the sheer volume is concerning. Bear with me while I work with my web host to deal with this problem. In the meantime, the <i>blogroll</i> on the side has enough <i>real news</i> to make MSNBC soil itself. So have at it, and I&#8217;ll be back when this thing passes. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rjjrdq.com/2010/03/05/mass-spam-attack/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Democrats To Kill Obamacare?</title>
		<link>http://rjjrdq.com/2010/03/03/democrats-to-kill-obamacare/</link>
		<comments>http://rjjrdq.com/2010/03/03/democrats-to-kill-obamacare/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 04:06:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rjjrdq</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bart Stupak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjjrdq.com/?p=2717</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Now we see why Barack Obama wants a straight up or down vote for his health care takeover plan. He just doesn&#8217;t have the support to do it the right way.</p>
<p>Ignoring the American people, ignoring Republicans-and the Americans voters they represent, ignoring anybody and anything that stand in the way of his 21st century Bolshevik [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now we see why Barack Obama wants a straight up or down vote for his health care takeover plan. He just doesn&#8217;t have the support to do it the right way.</p>
<p>Ignoring the American people, ignoring Republicans-and the Americans voters they represent, ignoring anybody and anything that stand in the way of his 21st century <i>Bolshevik revolution</i>, Barack Obama has indicated that he wants a straight up or down vote for his health care plan. That would be great for him, since Democrat socialists hold majorities in both the house and senate. That isn&#8217;t the way this republic works though, no matter how hard Obama tries to change that. If he tries to do it the right way, the way where representatives of the American people-even if they are in the majority, can have a voice, this thing dies on the vine.</p>
<p>Bart Stupak (D-Mich.) has indicated that he and 11 other Democrats <a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/84827-stupak-says-12-previous-health-bill-supporters-could-flip-over-abortion?page=1#comments" target="_blank"><i>will not</i> support</a> the senate version of the health care bill, namely because the provisions for funding abortion are too weak. He wants guarantees that abortion will not be funded or he and his pals will withdraw their support. Once you add the number of Dems that have retired, the ones who are on the proverbial chopping block in November, and the ones who have just had a change of heart, Nancy Pelosi will have a difficult task ahead of her to secure another 216 votes for a senate bill that many Dems are unhappy with.</p>
<p>Abortion is but one issue of contention. Rumors floating around <i>Capitol Hill</i> are that as many as 20 Democrats are ready to bill this bill to rest. We know that the senate will use reconciliation to get it through, so the real test is in the house, and Stupak has basically confirmed what Paul Ryan said a few days ago: they don&#8217;t have the votes.</p>
<p>That isn&#8217;t to say that they can&#8217;t get the votes. We know that <a href="http://americaswatchtower.com/2010/03/03/barack-obama-offers-the-brother-of-an-undecided-congressman-a-judgeship-was-this-a-payoff-for-his-healthcare-vote/" target="_blank">the White House is busy buying votes</a>, and with backroom deals already part of the package, it wouldn&#8217;t be a surprise to see a few more. But how many more deals could they make? 12-20 nays is quite a mountain to climb. Sure, they could change the language of the bill to make Stupak happy, but at the same time it would anger other Democrats. Pelosi is now stuck between a rock and a few hard places. She can&#8217;t make her own party happy, she has <i>no</i> Republican support, nor does she have the support of the American people. The only one on her side here is Barack Obama, and I don&#8217;t think that they are actually friends. They&#8217;re just both doing their duty <i>for the love of Karl.</I></p>
<p>Well, they can drag this thing out for months more, but at the same time, it will slow down the rest of the Obama nightmare train of legislation. It will have no effect on the behind the scenes maniacy that is disembowling this country from the inside out. Another post. Previous posts. Future posts. On the legislative front though the traitors that have oozed into Washington are finding out that is isn&#8217;t that easy to blatantly ignore the will of the people. An aspect of this whole process that just doesn&#8217;t get enough attention. These people are <i>ignoring us</i>. Yes, they hear us, they know what we want, but instead of really being <i>representative</I> they label us as <i>tea baggers</i> Nazis, astroturf, un-American, and the list goes on. I&#8217;ve said it before, the old tactic of accusing somebody else of what you are, and then watching them scramble to defend themselves, effectively cutting off real debate. That didn&#8217;t happen this time. A big thanks to Barry, Harry and Nan. Without you three stooges, America might still be asleep at the switch. We&#8217;re wide awake now.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rjjrdq.com/2010/03/03/democrats-to-kill-obamacare/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Confirmed: Nancy Pelosi Still A Clueless Zombie</title>
		<link>http://rjjrdq.com/2010/03/02/confirmed-nancy-pelosi-still-a-clueless-zombie/</link>
		<comments>http://rjjrdq.com/2010/03/02/confirmed-nancy-pelosi-still-a-clueless-zombie/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 03:18:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rjjrdq</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACORN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amnesty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nancy Pelosi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjjrdq.com/?p=2714</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s hard to tell if this hag actually believes what she is saying, or if she&#8217;s been lying for so long she just doesn&#8217;t know how to tell the truth.</p>
<p>As the bright lights of ABC News shined down on the fading Botoxed face of Nancy Pelosi, the San Francisco freak plumped herself up to the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s hard to tell if this hag actually believes what she is saying, or if she&#8217;s been lying for so long she just doesn&#8217;t know how to tell the truth.</p>
<p>As the bright lights of ABC News shined down on the fading Botoxed face of Nancy Pelosi, the <i>San Francisco freak</i> plumped herself up to the nation, even though she must know she stands alone in her assessment. Interviewer Elizabeth Vargas asked Pelosi to giver herself a grade for the last year, as Obama was asked about his last year. Barry gave himself a B+. That alone is enough to roll you eyes, but Pelosi took it a step further. <a href="http://gatewaypundit.firstthings.com/2010/03/pelosi-gives-herself-an-a/" target="_blank">Her answer was <i>an &#8220;A&#8221; for effort</i></a>. At first thought, you might be thinking that she is just obligated not to trash herself on national television. But take a deeper look. If her goal was to move the country as far to the left as possible, bilk  taxpayers for free plane rides for her and her family, muscle through legislation in the house the the American people were vehemently against, propose tax hikes for everything imaginable, ramrodding Obamacare, even as constituents were screaming in her frozen face to let it die, championing the threat of jail time for not buying it, and overall, absolutely ignoring the will of the American people, if that is what she was trying to accomplish&#8230;well then she might just deserve that <i>A.</i></p>
<p>Her job is not done though. After the senate uses reconciliation to pass their version of Obamacare, Pelosi will still need to muster enough votes to pass it in the house. She may not have those votes right now, according to Paul Ryan. That&#8217;s the good news. The bad news is that Pelosi still runs the house, at least until November, and possibly beyond, the Obama agenda is in full overdrive, government jobs and entitlements are increasing, even as the public sector wallows in the depression, the Justice and State Departments are being stocked with terror sympathizers, the national debt is crushing, and likely unpayable, the borders are <i>not secure</i> despite claims to the contrary, with Pelosi branding ICE agents <i>un American</i> for  enforcing immigration law, welcoming illegal aliens and touting <i>them</i> as patriots, even as they walk away from their own countries, running and hiding when the vote came down to de-fund ACORN, cap and trade, the <i>stimulus</i>, value added tax, and if all that isnt&#8217; bad enough&#8230;November isn&#8217;t here yet.</p>
<p>Sure, I&#8217;ll give her an <i>A</i> for effort. I would give Karl Marx an A for effort as well. It&#8217;s much easier to be <i>destructive</i> than <i>constructive</i>. Nancy Pelosi has taken the low road, and is destroying to the best of her ability. She has quite a role model in the White House.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rjjrdq.com/2010/03/02/confirmed-nancy-pelosi-still-a-clueless-zombie/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Los Angeles Being Belted With A &#8220;Carbon Surcharge&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://rjjrdq.com/2010/03/01/los-angeles-being-belted-with-a-carbon-surcharge/</link>
		<comments>http://rjjrdq.com/2010/03/01/los-angeles-being-belted-with-a-carbon-surcharge/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 03:53:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Los Angeles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Antonio Villaraigosa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjjrdq.com/?p=2710</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>We can blame the corrupt politicians in Los Angeles for the city&#8217;s woes all we want, but the fact is, if the citizens hadn&#8217;t voted for them in the first place, we wouldn&#8217;t be in this current downward spiral.</p>
<p>Mayor Antonio Mecha Villaraigosa, the corrupt, racist, lech, ex(?) gang member that is now in his second [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We can blame the corrupt politicians in Los Angeles for the city&#8217;s woes all we want, but the fact is, if the <i>citizens</i> hadn&#8217;t voted for them in the first place, we wouldn&#8217;t be in this current downward spiral.</p>
<p><a href="http://rjjrdq.wordpress.com/2008/09/06/the-current-los-angeles-mayor/" target="_blank">Mayor Antonio <i>Mecha</i> Villaraigosa</a>, the corrupt, racist, lech, ex(?) gang member that is now in his second term as Mayor of Los Angeles, is doing his part to perpetuate the global warming myth, and at the same time help drive another dagger into the back of the city. <a href="http://web.mac.com/waltermoore/WalterMooreSays.com/Blog/Entries/2010/2/28_Villaraigosa_Invokes_C_Word_To_Sell_Yet_Another_DWP_Rate_Hike.html" target="_blank">The latest scam</a> is a proposal to add a $2.50 monthly <i>surcharge</i> to Department of Water and Power energy bills in an effort to move towards renewable sources of energy. Nothing wrong with exploring those avenues, but this thing stinks from the top down.</p>
<p>The DWP, already awash in over $100 million in excess funds, are having those funds transferred to the general fund. The city is broke, and it will take money wherever it can get it. This leaves the DWP deficient in funds to accomplish the mayor&#8217;s <i>green initiative.</I> They have decided (not surprisingly) to turn to the taxpayer to pick up the slack. Never mind the sweetheart union deal that Villaraigosa worked out with the DWP, courtesy the city taxpayer, now he wants to hit us all again with a surcharge to take the place of the money that was raided by the city government. And  he may just get it. Remember, this is the same block of voters that handed itself a 10% phone tax thinking it was a tax <i>decrease.</I> You can&#8217;t make this up. This is the same block that voted in Villaraigosa twice, even as his approval numbers were in the tank. This same block is willing to shoot itself in the foot again, despite living in a city with one of the highest unemployment rates in the nation.</p>
<p>How easy is it to turn these voters upside down? Very easy. Villaraigosa&#8217;s goons did some polling to gauge voter reaction to being hoodwinked out of more of their dollars once again. The results had to make them smile.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8230;In the same line of questions, only 52% favored a surcharge or fee to cover the cost of converting the DWP from coal to renewable sources.</p>
<p>In another part of the survey, however, 64% of respondents said they were willing to pay a $2.50 surcharge to move the DWP off of coal, pollsters said.</p></blockquote>
<p>Yes, the voters were against it before they were for it. All they have to do is make the language so confusing that the voters won&#8217;t even understand what they&#8217;re being hit with. It shouldn&#8217;t be that difficult. After all, they successfully did just that with the phone tax. Not only that, the $2.50 number was just an estimate. It could be much higher.</p>
<p>If the voters of Los Angeles want to have their pockets picked once again so Villaraigosa can bankroll his buddies with some undoable <i>green scam</i>, then there may be nothing any of us can do about it. Unfortunately, they will take the rest of us down with the ship. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rjjrdq.com/2010/03/01/los-angeles-being-belted-with-a-carbon-surcharge/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.N. Global Warming Price Tag: $45 Trillion</title>
		<link>http://rjjrdq.com/2010/02/27/u-n-global-warming-price-tag-45-trillion/</link>
		<comments>http://rjjrdq.com/2010/02/27/u-n-global-warming-price-tag-45-trillion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 02:33:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjjrdq.com/?p=2703</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s right folks, trillion with a T. They&#8217;re ignoring all evidence of the fallacy of global warming, because this isn&#8217;t about global warming at all.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve said before that this is about wealth redistribution and not global warming, and we need to look no further than the United Nations&#8217; Governing Council of the United Nations Environment [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s right folks, <i>trillion with a T.</i> They&#8217;re ignoring all evidence of the fallacy of global warming, because this isn&#8217;t about global warming at all.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve said before that this is about wealth redistribution and not global warming, and we need to look no further than the United Nations&#8217; <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/projects/pdf/022510_greeneconomy.pdf" target="_blank"><i>Governing Council of the United Nations Environment Programme</i></a> for proof. Despite the recent revelations by Phil Jones over at the University of East Anglica that he has <i>lost</i> most of the data that supports global warming, and one admission after another that previous predictions were either wrong, or flat out lies, and the fact that entire countries are beginning to balk at this whole charade, the United Nations is plowing ahead with their scheme to separate you from your money. They estimate that the cost of reducing carbon dioxide emissions-which is basically your breathing <a href="http://www.infowars.com/leaked-un-documents-reveal-plan-for-green-world-order-by-2012/" target="_blank">will cost a staggering $45 trillion</a>, to be <i>redistributed</i> so all countries can get on the green bandwagon.</p>
<p>Well, we know India won&#8217;t play the game. They dumped the IPCC after their false analysis of the Himalayas melting. We also know China isn&#8217;t going to go along, even stating that they will take of care of their green initiative on their own. Now where would the U.N. get that kind of money if the two most populous countries in the world aren&#8217;t going to play along? That&#8217;s right, from the United States, which still perpetuates the myth around the world as the richest country on the planet. $13 trillion in hock and no money to pay it back is not rich in my book.</p>
<p>Since China isn&#8217;t likely to bankroll this goof-ball scheme that Obama himself has promoted, the only place to extract this money will be from the American taxpayer, already facing hard times with unemployment, underemployment, and new taxes on the horizon. Cap and trade and health care are just two of the possible taxes Americans will be belted with this year, not to mention the Pelosi favorite <i>value added tax.</i> Yes, the U.N. sees the gravy train flowing in the United States, and they have plans to get their corrupt, socialist, lying, Muslim accommodating hands on it.</p>
<p>If the U.N. has their way, Hugo Chavez, the Castro brothers, Lula in Brazil, Ahmajenidad in Iran and Assad in Syria and the plethora of corrupt regimes in Africa will all get a piece of your dime to fight <i>global warming.</i> I&#8217;m sure that&#8217;s exactly what they&#8217;ll use the money for. Of course, they know as well as we do that the money is really for something completely different. According to the U.N., which includes Barack Obama, make no mistake about that, the United States needs to be knocked down a few pegs in order to bring other countries up. Remember, Obama said that no country is above another, and damn if he isnt&#8217; going to show you how true he feels that is. This is tunnel vision thinking of socialist in general. They don&#8217;t believe that creation of something new is possible. They believe in lack and that there is only so much to go around, so instead of creating wealth, as a capitalist society would, the socialists will just redistribute what already exists, ensuring that entrepeneurial capital is wasted. That&#8217;s a recipe for failure, but all these clowns will be long gone by the time that happens, and history will inevitably be written to blame it on someone or something else. These idiots will be touted as heroes who tried to save the world. Remember the kind of folks that actually write history books, particularly for schools.</p>
<p>The good news is that Obama is unlikely to get any kind of legislation related to this through after November. The bad news is that he&#8217;s ready and willing to impose <i>executive orders</i> to circumvent congress. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rjjrdq.com/2010/02/27/u-n-global-warming-price-tag-45-trillion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CAIR Steps Up Attack On Abercrombie &amp; Fitch</title>
		<link>http://rjjrdq.com/2010/02/26/cair-steps-up-attack-on-abercrombie-fitch/</link>
		<comments>http://rjjrdq.com/2010/02/26/cair-steps-up-attack-on-abercrombie-fitch/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 05:35:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rjjrdq</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abercrombie & Fitch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CAIR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EEOC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Islam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Muslim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[racism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjjrdq.com/?p=2687</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>These cretins can&#8217;t decide whether to cry racism or religious persecution. What they can decide is that the United States should be a Muslim country, and they have the weight of the goverment to back them up. The folly of so many racial and religious discrimination arguments is that the remedy usually requires that somebody [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://rjjrdq.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/women_police_hijab__608x484.jpg"><img src="http://rjjrdq.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/women_police_hijab__608x484.jpg" alt="" title="women_police_hijab__608x484" width="200" height="148" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-2694" /></a>These cretins can&#8217;t decide whether to cry racism or religious persecution. What they can decide is that the United States should be a Muslim country, and they have the weight of the goverment to back them up. The folly of so many racial and religious discrimination arguments is that the remedy usually requires that <i>somebody else</i> be discriminated against. Just what CAIR is looking for.</p>
<p>Once again the terror supporting thugs at CAIR have <a href="http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1202444665649&#038;Abercrombie__Fitch_Draws_EEOC_Complaint_for_Banning_Hijab" target="_blank">targeted Abercrombie &#038; Fitch</a> for what they claim is racial discrimination. This is on the heels of a <a href="http://rjjrdq.com/2009/09/19/a-new-look-for-abercrombie-fitch/" target="_blank">similar complaint</a> several months ago where a brainwashed Muslim girl was denied employment for refusing to remove her <i>hijab</i> during work hours. Never mind the misogynistic symbology that the hijab represents, Abercrombie was immediately attacked, and the EEOC is doing the dirty work for them.</p>
<p>In this case, a girl was again, told not to wear the hijab during work hours, and when she refused, she was fired. The mistake Abercrombie made here was that the local manager initially said it was okay. The district manager-in line with Abercrombie policy about <i>headwear in general</i> told her to remove it. As she gave Abercrombie the proverbial finger, Allah directed her to the gates of CAIR, and the terror loving, <a href="http://rjjrdq.com/2009/10/19/cair-subversion-exposed/" target="_blank">government infiltrating</a> scumbags that should be disbanded as fast as ACORN took it from there.</p>
<p>Okay, the manager made a mistake. But the policy is no head wear. That would include hijabs, and I would imagine yamulkas as well. But CAIR is using the laws of the United States against itself. Title VII says that you cannot discriminate based on religion unless it would cause an undue hardship on the employer. What about the other employees? Does it not cause undue hardship for the other female employees to see a fellow woman debased in such a way? The custom of wearing the hijab is so vile that even <a href="/2009/11/13/sarkozy-gets-it-right-on-islam-illegal-aliens/" target="_blank">France is on the verge of banning it</a>. Yes, <i>that France.</i></p>
<p>Not sure where CAIR gets the racial discrimination part. Maybe the fact that virtually no whites are Muslim? This is not only an attack on Abercrombie, or an attack on the United States, but it is also an attack on whitey. In fact, Abercrombie has been sued in the past for marketing to whites, to exclusion of other races. I&#8217;ve said it before. If you want to sue for the opportunity to have overpriced slave/child labor produced junk marketed to you, then don&#8217;t be upset when somebody calls you the imbecile that you are. Using CAIRs argument, BET Network, Jet Magazine, Latino Magazine and other similar entities are in gross violation racial discrimination in comparison to what Abercrombie is being accused of. the EEOC had to dig to find some kind of perceived racial discrimination against Abercrombie in 2004, while ethno-centric interests blatantly flout <i>the law.</I> Abercrombie folded anyway and agreed to tokenize a certain amount of non-whites in order not to be sued again. Token minorities. Is that what you want from the EEOC? Because that is what we have.</p>
<p>We have more than that from the EEOC though. As if stocking the Justice Department with terrorist sympathizers, and having Sharia law advocates in the State Department, we now find out that the EEOC is pushing Islam like a needle full of heroin.</p>
<blockquote><p>In 2008, the EEOC issued guidelines for accommodating religious beliefs in the workplace, specifically offering protection for workers who wear the hijab.</p></blockquote>
<p>That&#8217;s right, specifically for the hijab. I just mentioned that virtually no whites are Muslim (what self-respecting white woman would debase herself in such a way), so this is all about the imposition of Islam, and the crumbling of everything that smacks of <i>anglo-saxonism.</I> You think that&#8217;s rhetoric? In England, <i>that is the plan.</i> Don&#8217;t believe it? More on that in another post. We have our own fish to fry here, and with a criminal organization like CAIR on the loose we have our work cut out for us. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rjjrdq.com/2010/02/26/cair-steps-up-attack-on-abercrombie-fitch/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
