<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>rjjrdq&#039;s America II</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rjjrdq.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rjjrdq.com</link>
	<description>Still good, still bad, and still absurd...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 20:39:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Redistribution Conference Held In Geneva</title>
		<link>http://rjjrdq.com/2010/09/03/redistribution-conference-held-in-geneva/</link>
		<comments>http://rjjrdq.com/2010/09/03/redistribution-conference-held-in-geneva/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 20:39:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rjjrdq</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geneva]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjjrdq.com/?p=2912</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The climate fraudsters are plowing ahead with their redistribution agenda, despite the fact that their scheme is based on phony, erroneous, and sometimes non-existent data. But this isn&#8217;t about the data: It&#8217;s about the money.</p> <p>The socialist representatives of 46 countries gathered in Geneva this week to discuss how to divide up your money [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The climate fraudsters are plowing ahead with their redistribution agenda, despite the fact that their scheme is based on <a href="/2010/01/22/climate-fraudsters-admit-their-data-is-bogus/" target="_blank">phony, erroneous, and sometimes non-existent data</a>. But this isn&#8217;t about the data: It&#8217;s about the money.</p>
<p>The socialist representatives of 46 countries <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20100903/sc_afp/climatewarmingfinance" target="_blank">gathered in Geneva</a> this week to discuss how to divide up your money between them. Under the guise of <i>climate change</i>, the meeting, chaired by the Swiss and Mexico (yes, Mexico), centered around how the money was to be distributed. This was the same issue that plagued <a href="/2009/12/17/copenhagen-conference-in-flames/" target="_blank">the disastrous Copenhagen conference</a> last year. They have come to an agreement that some kind of general fund, where <i>rich</i> countries, such as the $13 trillion in debt United States would infuse with billions of dollars a year, to be redistributed to countries such as co-host Mexico.</p>
<p>What is Mexico doing hosting anything? They just want the money. Do you think a government that corrupt would take billions in freebies and apply it to reducing non-existent climate change? No, they wouldn&#8217;t, and all 46 countries know that. What they want is to spread the wealth out across all countries, and this would in theory create economic parity. We know this is not the case. Handing money over to someone you <i>know</i> is going to rip you off is not only a stupid idea, but in the case of the United States, suicidal.</p>
<p>Already <i>trillions</i> in debt, the United States cannot afford to fund such a scam. That money would have to be borrowed from the likes of China, who would end up being a recipient of some of the money from the fund. <i>Try and wrap your mind around that.</i> The plan though, is not to raise the standard of living for all. The plan is to lower it for some countries, which will in theory raise it for others. I just talked about the corruption in Mexico. What about countries such as Venezuela, Sudan, even Iran? What would they do with an infusion of money? These are the countries that stand to benefit from this scam.</p>
<p>The U.N. has their own ideas. I&#8217;ve talked before about Barack Obama turning sovereignty over to a foreign entity. The U.N. wants to impose world taxes on all of us. If Obama has his way, you can be sure the United States will be paying. It may not be possible after November though.</p>
<p>Fraud, redistribution, and stealing from America. If this sounds like a good idea, then these pack of cretins share your values. If you realize what a scam this is, then make some noise, because eventually, any money extracted out of the hide of the U.S. will have to be paid back-by you. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rjjrdq.com/2010/09/03/redistribution-conference-held-in-geneva/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Feds Tearing The Flesh From Arizona</title>
		<link>http://rjjrdq.com/2010/09/02/feds-tearing-the-flesh-from-arizona/</link>
		<comments>http://rjjrdq.com/2010/09/02/feds-tearing-the-flesh-from-arizona/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 19:04:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rjjrdq</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[illegal aliens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Arpaio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maricopa County]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjjrdq.com/?p=2905</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>As far as the Obama regime is concerned, you&#8217;ll get amnesty, and you&#8217;ll like it. Like a brutal guard in a Russian gulag, the feds are torturing the great state of Arizona to show the other 49 states what could happen to them for daring to fight illegal immigration.</p> <p>With an activist judge legislating [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As far as the Obama regime is concerned, <i>you&#8217;ll get amnesty, and you&#8217;ll like it.</i> Like a brutal guard in a Russian gulag, the feds are torturing the great state of Arizona to show the other 49 states what could happen to them for daring to fight illegal immigration.</p>
<p>With an activist judge legislating from the bench and putting S.B. 1070 on life support, to the State Department <a href="/2010/08/27/s-b-1070-part-of-state-department-human-rights-report/" target="_blank">submitting the issue to the U.N.</a> for approval by the worst violators of human rights on the planet, to <a href="/2010/08/31/justice-department-digs-fangs-deeper-into-arizona/" target="_blank">suing a school district</a> for making it difficult for illegal aliens to land jobs, it would seem like Arizona would have taken enough of a beating from Obama and his goons. But they aren&#8217;t done with Arizona. <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/us_arizona_sheriff_lawsuit" target="_blank">Now they have set their guns on Sheriff Joe Arpaio,</a> maybe <i>the</i> most effective sheriff in the country at combating the flood of illegal aliens. Arpaio&#8217;s of behavior doesn&#8217;t fit in the the Obama agenda, and as a result, yet another lawsuit that stands to further inflict pain on Arizona has commenced.</p>
<p>This time, the feds are suing Joe Arpaio for not turning over documents which they claim may show discrimination on the part of Arpaio and the Maricopa County Sheriffs Department when arresting those supected of being illegal aliens. The problem is that they haven&#8217;t actually defined what documents they want. They sued anyway.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;They have hundreds of thousands of reports, hundreds of thousands,&#8221; Arpaio said. &#8220;They&#8217;re so broad, we&#8217;re trying to narrow it down. We&#8217;re trying to work with them.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>So the lawsuit is suing for access to anything they want, whenever they want, whatever that is. After the S.B. 1070 fiasco, they just may get that kind of access.</p>
<p>The feds are still angry that Arpaio still continues immigration sweeps, even after he was stripped of federal authority to do so. He continues under current Arizona law, separate from S.B. 1070. This isn&#8217;t the only federal attack on Arpaio either. In addition to stripping federal immigration authority, he has a separate <i>abuse of authority</i> case pending. Hispanic ethno-hate groups are after Arpaio as well, and some are suggesting jail as a way to bring him to his knees.</p>
<p>The contempt for the rule of law, and the will of the American people for that matter is indicative of the Obama agenda. November can&#8217;t get here fast enough, but that won&#8217;t change these kinds of attacks on states. A very effective way to silence an opponent is to sue them. The ACLU uses this tactic all the time. Not that they have any standing in most of their suits, but with activist judges and the cost of fighting a lawsuit, for many, it just isn&#8217;t worth the fight. Arizona, and Maricopa County so far have the resources to battle the Obama regime, but those are resources that take away from law enforcement. Obama and his goons could care less though. Defying the rule of law is the reasoning behind the lawsuits. Obama is playing like this some kind of board game. The destruction of a continent and reshaping it into some kind of socialist utopia will not only fail, but leave a trail of destruction that will be difficult, if not impossible to recover from. But Obama will be long gone by then, and the blame can be placed safely on someone else.   </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rjjrdq.com/2010/09/02/feds-tearing-the-flesh-from-arizona/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Justice Department Digs Fangs Deeper Into Arizona</title>
		<link>http://rjjrdq.com/2010/08/31/justice-department-digs-fangs-deeper-into-arizona/</link>
		<comments>http://rjjrdq.com/2010/08/31/justice-department-digs-fangs-deeper-into-arizona/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 05:22:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rjjrdq</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[illegal aliens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[justice department]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjjrdq.com/?p=2901</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The state of Arizona is under full scale attack by Barack al-Obama, and the message being sent to the rest of the states couldn&#8217;t be more clear.</p> <p>As if suing Arizona to put the brakes on S.B. 1070, and bitching to U.N. member countries like China, Cuba, Saudi Arabia and Libya about the law [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The state of Arizona is under full scale attack by Barack al-Obama, and the message being sent to the rest of the states couldn&#8217;t be more clear.</p>
<p>As if suing Arizona to put the brakes on S.B. 1070, and bitching to U.N. member countries like China, Cuba, Saudi Arabia and Libya about the law weren&#8217;t enough, now the Obama regime is coming at the state from a new angle. Now they are <a href="http://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2010/08/31/Arizona-colleges-sued-for-discrimination/UPI-31331283269387/" target="_blank">suing an Arizona community college district</a> for checking the papers of non-citizens before they were hired. The suit says that they did more checking than the law required. If the suit is successful, fines, and possibly terminations could result.</p>
<p>Unless there is some part of the law I&#8217;m not familiar with, <i>any</i> employer can check <i>anything</i> regarding a potential hire. Conforming to government guidelines would guarantee that illegals aliens would be working at the schools that your children attend. Where is it written that you have to stop checking at a certain point? Using the government argument, a dishwasher and a rocket scientist are subject to the same standards of background checks. Yes, that is absurd, but in this case, a cash strapped school district may not have the resources to fight the suit.</p>
<p>If the Obama regime indeed does have a case per whatever law may be on the books, it is just one more example of a system upside down. These clowns are actually suing to make it easier for non-citizens to force out native prospects at a time when unemployment is hovering near 10%, and even higher than that in some areas. Arizona was just trying to weed out the illegal aliens applying for jobs. If Obama has anything to say about it, Arizona won&#8217;t be able to wipe its ass without being sued. Keep in mind, that Sheriff Joe Arpaio is also being sued for not cooperating with feds in a probe that he allegedly racially profiled to capture illegal aliens.</p>
<p>When was the last time you saw a single state under this kind of attack? They&#8217;re making an example of Arizona, and the trampling of the Constitution is being met largely with silence in Washington. We can&#8217;t expect much from Michael Steele and the rest of those buffoons, so that shouldn&#8217;t come as much of a surprise. It does give a preview of what to expect in November, if indeed the Republicans take back some kind of control. Yes, better than socialist lefties, but that isn&#8217;t saying much. Standing up for Arizona would draw the support of the majority of the country, but we know that the GOP still has plans for pandering to Hispanics. That leaves Arizona alone, at the mercy of a Muslim, socialist, anti-American imposter who would love nothing more than to shape American into the image of one of his favorite third world cesspools&#8230;Allah willing. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rjjrdq.com/2010/08/31/justice-department-digs-fangs-deeper-into-arizona/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Confirmed: Obama Is A Muslim</title>
		<link>http://rjjrdq.com/2010/08/30/confirmed-obama-is-a-muslim/</link>
		<comments>http://rjjrdq.com/2010/08/30/confirmed-obama-is-a-muslim/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 00:38:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rjjrdq</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ahmed Aboul Gheit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Egypt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Islam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Muslim]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjjrdq.com/?p=2896</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The mainstream media won&#8217;t touch this with a stick, but for the rest of us, this is a confirmation from a source that is outside the conspiratorial teabagger label that has been placed on patriotic Americans.</p> <p>Actions speak louder than words, and the actions that Barack Obama has taken on behalf of Islam have [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The mainstream media won&#8217;t touch this with a stick, but for the rest of us, this is a confirmation from a source that is outside the conspiratorial <i>teabagger</i> label that has been placed on patriotic Americans.</p>
<p>Actions speak louder than words, and the actions that Barack Obama has taken on behalf of Islam have been disturbing, to say the least, considering his Muslim upbringing. There has always been a significant percentage of Americans that believed Obama was a Muslim, but up until now it was hard to prove, except by his unusual affinity towards the Muslim world. <a href="http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2010/06/-obama-tells-egyptian-foreign-minister-i-am-a-muslim-stealth-coup-on-the-white-house.html" target="_blank">Now we have confirmation</a> straight from the Muslim street that he has coddled almost from day one of the presidency.</p>
<p>Back in January, Egyptian Foreign Minister Ahmed Aboul Gheit appeared on the Egyptian television show called <i>The Round Table Show.</i> It was there that he told the world of one of his several conversations with Obama.</p>
<blockquote><p>“The American President told me in confidence that he is a Muslim,” said Egyptian Foreign Minister Ahmed Aboul Gheit on Nile TV.</p></blockquote>
<p>This isn&#8217;t some loon off the street, this is the Foreign Minister of Egypt. He detailed Obama&#8217;s commitment to Islam, and left nothing to the imagination as to what side of the Koran Obama stands. Even worse, according to Aboul Gheit, Obama made what appeared to be a threat towards Israel.</p>
<blockquote><p>He asked that the Moslem world show patience. Obama promised that once he overcame some domestic American problems (Healthcare), that he would show the Moslem world what he would do with Israel.</p></blockquote>
<p>Does that sound like a Christian to you? Is Obama planning the destruction of Israel? We know that he has demanded that Israel halt settlements and make concessions to Hamas infiltrated Palestinians, even as rockets landed on Israeli soil. What does he think he will <i>do</i> with Israel? The most likely scenario is to cut off aid for some manufactured international sleight by Israel. He&#8217;ll have plenty of help from the U.N. to pull off that charade. Or maybe he&#8217;ll try military action. Would U.S. troops fight and die to promote Obama&#8217;s Muslim agenda? Folks, we could be looking at a civil war in that case. Think it can&#8217;t happen? Look around the world; it happens routinely.</p>
<p>And what of Obama&#8217;s plans for America? We know he supports the <i>ground zero</i> victory mosque, and that he has blocked investigators in the Ft. Hood massacre attack. He has also stuffed Muslims and Muslim sympathizers into the government, and weeding them out will be difficult at this point. We know some of the major goons, but the minions we may never identify.</p>
<p>So far, nothing from the GOP that stands to gain in November. Will they make some noise after that? Not with Michael Steele at the helm. The GOP is in disarray, but the Dems are even worse off. They&#8217;ve selected an anti-American Muslim as their leader. Unfortunately he has plans for us all, <i>Allah willing.</i> Yet another front page story that never made the mainstream. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rjjrdq.com/2010/08/30/confirmed-obama-is-a-muslim/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ted Hayes Shreds Race Baiter In Debate</title>
		<link>http://rjjrdq.com/2010/08/29/ted-hayes-shreds-race-baiter-in-debate/</link>
		<comments>http://rjjrdq.com/2010/08/29/ted-hayes-shreds-race-baiter-in-debate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 02:55:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al Sharpton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glenn Beck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[racism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Southern Christian Leadership Conference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ted Hayes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjjrdq.com/?p=2885</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><p class="wp-caption-text">Ted Hayes</p>If anybody doesn&#8217;t know who Ted Hayes is, I encourage you to go check him out. He is a patriot and a great American. Not everybody thinks so, but Ted is more than able to not only defend himself, but to make his opponents look ridiculous in the process.</p> <p>Last Night, Fox [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><div id="attachment_2887" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 204px"><a href="http://rjjrdq.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/ted-hayes.jpg"><img src="http://rjjrdq.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/ted-hayes-194x300.jpg" alt="" title="ted-hayes" width="194" height="300" class="size-medium wp-image-2887" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Ted Hayes</p></div>If anybody doesn&#8217;t know who <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ted_Hayes" target="_blank">Ted Hayes</a> is, I encourage you to go check him out. He is a patriot and a great American. Not everybody thinks so, but Ted is more than able to not only defend himself, but to make his opponents look ridiculous in the process.</p>
<p>Last Night, Fox 11 in Los Angeles hosted a debate between Hayes, and Rev. Eric Lee of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference. Don&#8217;t let that name fool you. Lee came out spewing hate from his first sentence. This debate was about the Glenn Beck rally earlier in the day, a non-political event that welcomed all. At the same time, Al Sharpton held his own rally in the shadows. The event(s) were held the same day that Dr. Martin Luther King gave his <i>I have a Dream</i> speech. This enraged both Sharpton and Lee, who attempted to paint the event as racist whites coming together and soiling the memory of Dr. King. Apparently he had never heard of Ted Hayes. I bet he&#8217;ll never forget him now.</p>
<p>When Lee tried to put Ted on the spot by asking why the crowd was &#8220;all&#8221; white, Hayes took it to him, as only Ted can. He basically told him the black &#8220;leaders&#8221; like Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson have ingrained the notion that whitey is responsible for all the problems that blacks face. If fact, Hayes chastised Lee by reminding him that Dr. King said to <i>judge people by the content of their character, and not the color of their skin,</i> and that Lee and other black leaders were doing just the opposite. He also noted that the Sharpton crowd was all black. Lee changed the subject.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t do justice by trying to describe the sense that Ted Hayes made. Watch the video. If nothing else for the entertainment value as he destroys this race baiter. Too bad we don&#8217;t have more patriots in Washington that have the intelligence, the insight, and the love of country that Ted Hayes has. </p>
<p><object width="400" height="327"><param name="movie" value="http://www.popmodal.com/nvp/player/nvplayer.swf?config=http://www.popmodal.com/nvp/econfig.php?key=6833d2d0cb944555739c"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.popmodal.com/nvp/player/nvplayer.swf?config=http://www.popmodal.com/nvp/econfig.php?key=6833d2d0cb944555739c" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"wmode="transparent" width="400" height="327"></embed></object>                </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rjjrdq.com/2010/08/29/ted-hayes-shreds-race-baiter-in-debate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>S.B. 1070 Part Of State Department Human Rights Report</title>
		<link>http://rjjrdq.com/2010/08/27/s-b-1070-part-of-state-department-human-rights-report/</link>
		<comments>http://rjjrdq.com/2010/08/27/s-b-1070-part-of-state-department-human-rights-report/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2010 03:33:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rjjrdq</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Globalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jan Brewer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S.B.1070]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjjrdq.com/?p=2877</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve said before that Barry Soetoro wants to turn the sovereignty of the United States over to some kind of international authority. You think that&#8217;s rhetoric? Check this out.</p> <p>As if it weren&#8217;t outrageous enough that the State Department submitted a report to the U.N. chronicling human rights abuses in the United States, the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve said before that Barry Soetoro wants to turn the sovereignty of the United States over to some kind of international authority. You think that&#8217;s rhetoric? Check this out.</p>
<p>As if it weren&#8217;t outrageous enough that the State Department <a href="/2010/08/24/state-department-trashes-u-s-on-human-rights/" target="_blank">submitted a report</a> to the U.N. chronicling human rights abuses in the United States, the report, in all its inaccuracies has even gone as far as to <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100828/ap_on_re_us/us_brewer_un_report" target="_blank">bash the state of Arizona</a> for daring to protect themselves from the mayhem heaped upon that state by illegal immigration. The report singles out S.B. 1070, the Arizona law that would have been extremely effective at identifying and detaining illegal aliens.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;A recent Arizona law, S.B. 1070, has generated significant attention and debate at home and around the world,&#8221; the report says. &#8220;The issue is being addressed in a court action that argues that the federal government has the authority to set and enforce immigration law. That action is ongoing; parts of the law are currently enjoined.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Why would such a thing be included in a human rights report? The State Department has been silent thus far. As soon they get instructions though, they&#8217;ll come up with a statement that is likely to be just as outrageous as their actions. Arizona governor Jan Brewer isn&#8217;t waiting for them though. She hit the roof when she saw this and fired off a letter to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, demanding that the reference to S.B. 1070., and the state of Arizona for that matter, be redacted from the report.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;The idea of our own American government submitting the duly enacted laws of a state of the United States to &#8216;review&#8217; by the United Nations is internationalism run amok and unconstitutional,&#8221; Brewer wrote.</p></blockquote>
<p>And she&#8217;s right. How dare the Obama regime submit for review <i>any</i> actions by the United States to the likes of China, Cuba and Saudi Arabia, among other bastions of human rights.<br />
What could she expect from the State Department though? This is the department that boasts the services of <a href="http://rjjrdq.wordpress.com/2009/04/08/obama-to-force-sharia-law-on-us/" target="_blank">Harold Koh</a>, the sharia law loving freak that no doubt has a like-minded staff. Yes, the same State Department that supports sharia law is claiming human rights abuses by the United States-and whining about it to some of the worst abusers of human rights on earth.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t expect anything to be removed from that report. Barack Obama wants the U.N. to mandate what America is, and he could care less about the Constitution. If he did, he never would have allowed this act of sedition to occur. No doubt the Obama administration is not included in the report. Using State Department criteria, they should be though. Obama has defied the will of the people on more than one occasion, and he&#8217;s done it again in blocking implementation of S.B. 1070.</p>
<p>Folks, there are those that hate America, and do not want it to exist. They will partake in all America has to offer, take full advantage of the freedoms provided, and then work to destroy it for everyone else. No, it doesn&#8217;t make sense. You can compare this kind of extreme left wing ideology to drug addiction. They can&#8217;t stop, and they will lie, cheat, steal, and do anything else they have to in order to keep the habit alive. Not only do they burden the rest of us, but they are destroying themselves in the process. That is the nature of addiction.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rjjrdq.com/2010/08/27/s-b-1070-part-of-state-department-human-rights-report/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Illegal Aliens Sail Into The United States</title>
		<link>http://rjjrdq.com/2010/08/26/illegal-aliens-sail-into-the-united-states/</link>
		<comments>http://rjjrdq.com/2010/08/26/illegal-aliens-sail-into-the-united-states/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 02:30:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rjjrdq</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[illegal aliens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjjrdq.com/?p=2869</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>For the illegal aliens that think waltzing across the border is a little too risky these days, there is another available option; they can take a cruise.</p> <p>Immigration and Customs agents are bemoaning the fact that illegal aliens have found yet another way to cross into the United States. Small boats, packed with illegals [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the illegal aliens that think waltzing across the border is a little too risky these days, there is another available option; they can take a cruise.</p>
<p>Immigration and Customs agents are bemoaning the fact that illegal aliens <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100826/ap_on_re_us/us_sea_smuggling" target="_blank">have found yet another way</a> to cross into the United States. Small boats, packed with illegals simply cruise into American waters and onto shore. Authorities know that these rickety wooden boats are coming from a small fishing village on the Mexican side, but still cannot seem to stop them with any regularity. So here is the scenario: We know <i>exactly</i> where they&#8217;re coming from, down to where the boats are docked. Those boats can only have so much fuel per trip, so the area that needs to be patrolled is much smaller than what authorities would have you believe. Those boats will run out gas if they go too far out. In theory though, those boats should never make it to U.S. waters. That&#8217;s where Mexican complicity comes into play. They know where these boats are being launched. A small boat filled with a few dozen people headed to the open sea <i>should</i> look suspicious. So what is Mexico doing about it?</p>
<p>We know that Mexico won&#8217;t do anything about it. The fact is, that exporting their poverty to the United States relieves them of the burden of actually having to care for their citizens. Many of the illegals that do make it here will send money back to Mexico, artificially boosting the economy. So not only does the United States have to deal with the smugglers, they have to deal with a foreign government that is actively encouraging their citizens to leave. Add to that elements within the United States government that reward the illegal behavior with benefits and promises of amnesty, and you have the recipe for the merging of two countries. You can&#8217;t blame that one on Obama, although he has picked up the torch and is running with it. George Bush wanted the exact same thing.</p>
<p>So as America protests the lack of immigration enforcement, and the restrictions on the what little enforcement is done, the border continues to be trampled by citizens that have no allegiance to the United states. The job market is flooded with cheap labor, social services are strained, and etho-politics becomes more prevalent with each breach of our borders. I&#8217;ve talked before about the point of no return. At a certain point, the United States will be no more, and will become a balkanized third world country. If you think that&#8217;s rhetoric, check the numbers and do the math. California is already rife with politicians that are loyal to Mexico, and <i>not</i> the United States. The federal government has a Latino caucus that is of, by, and for Latinos, and Latinos only. Yes, that would be race based. This shouldn&#8217;t be about race, and it isn&#8217;t to the sane. To others though, <i>it&#8217;s all about race.</i> Prepare yourself. More on that coming. It&#8217;s worse than even I thought.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rjjrdq.com/2010/08/26/illegal-aliens-sail-into-the-united-states/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DHS Turns Loose Thousands Of Illegal Aliens</title>
		<link>http://rjjrdq.com/2010/08/26/dhs-turns-loose-thousands-of-illegal-alien-criminals/</link>
		<comments>http://rjjrdq.com/2010/08/26/dhs-turns-loose-thousands-of-illegal-alien-criminals/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 07:27:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rjjrdq</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homeland Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Janet Napolitano]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjjrdq.com/?p=2862</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The charade known as the Obama immigration policy just keeps on playing. Just weeks after wasting more money by signing a $600 million border security farce, we now get the news that the very criminals that new funding was to target are being turned loose-criminal record and all.</p> <p>An ICE spokesman provided the unsurprising [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The charade known as the Obama immigration policy just keeps on playing. Just weeks after wasting more money by signing a $600 million border security farce, we now get the news that the very criminals that new funding was to target are being turned loose-criminal record and all.</p>
<p>An ICE spokesman provided the <a href="http://www.examiner.com/immigration-reform-in-national/obamnesty-it-s-here-feds-now-dismissing-thousands-of-deportation-cases" target="_blank">unsurprising news</a> on Tuesday that the Department of Homeland <i>insecurity</i> is prioritizing its immigration cases based on criminal history. They only want the big fish. If an illegal alien has committed a mere <i>misdemeanor</i>, and have been in the country for a few years, they&#8217;ll just turn them loose. How they determine the length of time an illegal has been in the country is anybody&#8217;s guess, but in the end, this isn&#8217;t about prioritizing at all: This is about defacto amnesty.</p>
<p>Obama and his cronies know that there is no way that he can ram through amnesty this year, but if he can keep the current crop of illegals in the country he can give them official amnesty later. In the meantime, Democrats will continue to receive fraudulent votes from many of the these illegal aliens. If you don&#8217;t think that occurs, I invite you to visit California. Pick a candidate before you come, because <i>nobody</i> will question who you are at the polling place. All you have to do is come up with a name and you can vote for that person. With voter turnout so low, you have a good chance of being able to cast a vote for someone else. In fact, you may be able to do it several times. Without the support of millions of illegal aliens, along with their legal family and friends, the Democratic party would be significantly weaker. That&#8217;s at least 20 million potential voters, and if an amnesty can indeed be passed later, you can add millions more on to the Dem voter rolls.</p>
<p>The DHS is doing this even as the Justice Department sues Arizona for trying to protect themselves against the very same individuals that the DHS is turning loose. If that doesn&#8217;t fit the definition of an upside down universe, nothing does. Could Janet Napolitano be charged with aiding and abetting illegal aliens? Committing a crime under the color of authority? You bet she could. The problem is that you would have to turn her in to the Justice Department.</p>
<p>The next time you hear of someone that cheated, lied, connived or stole, just remember where those values are emanating from. The message from Washington is that those values are not only okay, but is how business is done. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rjjrdq.com/2010/08/26/dhs-turns-loose-thousands-of-illegal-alien-criminals/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bloomberg Still Trying To Hand New York To Islam</title>
		<link>http://rjjrdq.com/2010/08/25/bloomberg-still-trying-to-hand-new-york-to-islam/</link>
		<comments>http://rjjrdq.com/2010/08/25/bloomberg-still-trying-to-hand-new-york-to-islam/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 10:44:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rjjrdq</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[9-11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Islam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mosque]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Muslim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjjrdq.com/?p=2852</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Although it is true that virtually all elections are subject to some kind of voting chicanery-c&#8217;mon New Yorkers, how many times have you elected that numbskull mayor of yours? He is just a symptom of a larger problem in New York, though. At least there are some of you that still have some common [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although it is true that virtually all elections are subject to some kind of voting chicanery-c&#8217;mon New Yorkers, how many times have you elected that numbskull mayor of yours? He is just a symptom of a larger problem in New York, though. At least there are some of you that still have some common sense.</p>
<p>New York mayor Michael Bloomberg, continuing his quest for honorary <i>apostate</i> of the year <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100825/ap_on_re_us/us_nyc_mosque" target="_blank">spoke at a Muslim sharia fest dinner</a> and once again reiterated his support for a mosque in the shadow of ground zero. His twisted logic this time around was that if we didn&#8217;t allow the mosque to be built, that the war on terror would be jeopardized. In his opinion, allowing Islam to rub our nose in the memory of 9-11 was the way to-well, he wasn&#8217;t clear as to why it would be a good idea, only that we wouldn&#8217;t look like a free nation if we didn&#8217;t allow an intolerant terror cult to build a shrine at one of their massacres.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m glad the media finally got a hold of this story. <a href="/2009/12/20/muslims-set-to-desecrate-ground-zero/" target="_blank">I talked about this atrocity last year</a>.If anybody thinks that Islam is a <i>religion of peace</i> needs only to pick up a newspaper on any given day to see how peaceful they really are. Even the imam who pulled the mosque project out of his ass suggested justified terror by saying that the U.S. had it coming on 9-11. Now he wants to run a victory lap, and Bloomberg is trying to clear the way for him. Bloomberg, and many other left-wing nuts like him don&#8217;t have an answer as to why it is always America that needs to be accommodating, even to the repulsive, and not the other way around.</p>
<p>America is currently a Christian nation, whether Barack Obama or Michael Bloomberg want to accept that or not. Islam and Christianity are incompatible. When was the last time you heard of a Christian terror attack? When was the last time an artist had his life threatened for drawing a picture of Jesus? When was the last time a Christian sued their employer because they wanted to wear a cross around their neck? Never. Those things don&#8217;t happen with Christians. They <i>do</i> happen with Muslims though. They are not about co-existing; they are about imposition. There is no compromise. Open any page of the Koran and see for yourself. Islam preaches one thing, but tells us infidels something else. At this point in America, it&#8217;s the &#8220;moderate&#8221; Muslims that &#8220;just want to practice their religion&#8221;. However, once there are a sufficient number of Muslims in a given area, then requests become demands, for things like sharia law. Barack Obama has already set the stage for that by stocking the State Department with <a href="http://rjjrdq.wordpress.com/2009/04/08/obama-to-force-sharia-law-on-us/" target="_blank">sharia law advocates like Harold Koh</a>. At a certain point talk is over, and violence and force becomes the order of the day. If you think that&#8217;s rhetoric, just take a look around the world anywhere where Islam has taken hold. The greater the numbers, the greater the demands, and the greater the imposition on that society. Europe will tell you. Take a look at France. And I&#8217;ve said before, most people don&#8217;t do anything about anything. That doesn&#8217;t mean they don&#8217;t condone the activities of others.</p>
<p>People like Michael Bloomberg are clueless, and those like Obama really are just practicing their religion. I don&#8217;t need to make anything up. What other <i>religion</i> has followers that behave like Muslims? None. Is allowing the kind of behavior the Muslims exhibit around the world considered tolerance? Islam is a one way street. Buffoons like Bloomberg just don&#8217;t get it.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rjjrdq.com/2010/08/25/bloomberg-still-trying-to-hand-new-york-to-islam/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>rjjrdq Has Returned</title>
		<link>http://rjjrdq.com/2010/08/24/rjjrdq-has-returned/</link>
		<comments>http://rjjrdq.com/2010/08/24/rjjrdq-has-returned/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 06:43:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rjjrdq</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjjrdq.com/?p=2845</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I took a little hiatus, but I&#8217;m back. Fortunately, I haven&#8217;t been away that long, and I&#8217;ll start posting again. Maybe not as much as in the past, but they will be tactical. I just had to take-we&#8217;ll call it a vacation. Yes, we have to fight the good fight for the good of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I took a little hiatus, but I&#8217;m back. Fortunately, I haven&#8217;t been away that long, and I&#8217;ll start posting again. Maybe not as much as in the past, but they will be <i>tactical</i>. I just had to take-we&#8217;ll call it a vacation. Yes, we have to fight the good fight for the good of the country, but at the same time <i>you</i> are responsible for your own little piece of the universe. Don&#8217;t ignore that, or take it for granted. I&#8217;m willing to bet that all of you out there have plenty to be grateful for, and you should be there to enjoy it. Don&#8217;t let the government take your life away. We&#8217;ll deal with them. In the meantime, have your priorities straight. Everything in moderation.</p>
<p>Now let&#8217;s get down to business&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rjjrdq.com/2010/08/24/rjjrdq-has-returned/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
