Speaking to a room full of open borders advocates calling themselves Hispanics in Politics, Paul said all the right things to the crowd that was in front of him. Of course, the folks in front of him are not in favor of securing the border at all, and for those that are, Paul had some choice comments directed at them.

Paul’s stated positions on immigration sound sensible on the surface. The question is, does he mean what he says? Enforcement of border security. He’s advocated bringing our troops home and putting them on the border. Troops on the border is a good idea in light of the fact that Mexican drug cartels are heavily armed, courtesy of Fast and Furious. He’s against amnesty, citing the obvious fact that it would encourage even more illegal immigration-as it has before. He wants to abolish the welfare state. An impossibility as long as one Democrat is still alive, but at least attempting to address the destructive culture of government handouts is a step in the right direction. He also proposes ending birthright citizenship. If the 14th Amendment was property interpreted, we wouldn’t even be having this discussion.

What Paul had to say to the reconquistas was quite different though. Suggesting that Americans could care less about illegal immigration when economic times are good, Paul ignored the fact that immigration has exploded in the 10 years. Even government numbers show that illegal immigration has surpassed legal immigration as the preferred choice of entry into the United States. To Paul though, all you have to do is slip a couple of bucks to an American, and all is well.

He talked about how Americans are more accepting of outsiders when the economy is good, but when trouble looms there is a search for scapegoats.

Millions of Americans are desperately seeking work, while millions more illegal aliens hold jobs that should go to those desperate Americans. Very few are out in the fields, by the Mexican government’s own admission. As far as Paul is concerned though, one whimper of protest and you’re acting like a Nazi.

“I believe Hispanics have been used as scapegoats, to say, they’re the problem instead of being a symptom maybe of a problem with the welfare state,” Paul told the group. “In Nazi Germany they had to have scapegoats to blame and they turned on the Jews.

Not to illegal immigration in general, just to Hispanics. Paul doesn’t understand that there are those-such as the ones he was speaking to, that want the borders erased, that want to turn America into the mythical empire of Aztlan, that believe this land was stolen from them-that know Mexico is spiraling into a failed narco state and the United States may be their only chance of preserving a nation. They’ll have to move that nation North to do it though, and Paul is okay with that. He talks about troops on the border, but doesn’t want to invest any money to make it happen. So it’ll never happen. Without a super super majority in Congress, none of his other stated positions will be implemented either.

Ron Paul fails to see emergencies that are right in front of him. Illegal immigration is out of control. Half assed measures will get half assed results. It’s too bad that things have been allowed to get this bad, but they have, and now it will take extreme measures-at least for the foreseeable future, to fix the mess. with Ron Paul, we would get nothing. I take that back, with Ron Paul we would get an open border, a nuclear armed Iran, and his blessings as cheap garbage from China floods the country. He was pretty clear about all those things on the campaign trail and in debates. Or am I just looking for a scapegoat, Ron?

I know there are many out there that like what Paul has to say on many issues, especially constitutionally, but look at the broader picture. Do you really want this guy in the White House?

The Obama regime is so entangled with Wall Street that it’s hard to tell them apart sometimes. Tim Geithner will tell you, as well as the Citi Bank hack Jack Lew that is now his chief of staff. There are many other nameless Wall Street types that troll the administration. But at the prayer breakfast, Obama professed to believe that you should love thy neighbor as thyself. Indeed, he has done just that. So while he lectures Wall Street in front of the rest of us, the conversation is very different behind the scenes. I don’t care that Obama surrounds himself with Wall Street; he should stop pretending that he doesn’t.

That was just for starters. He moved on to taxes, specifically for the wealthy, which so far, has been a fuzzy line with this regime. He took a parable from the Gospel of Luke out of context for this one. Unwittingly, Obama used a line from the parable that should be applied to him. It is a parable about the consequences of abusing authority that has been bestowed upon you. It has nothing to do with money, or the rich paying their fair share.

He even defended his foreign policy, once again perverting a passage from the bible to do so.

Speak up for those who cannot speak for themselves, for the rights of all who are destitute

This is the guy that championed the rise of the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, even now routing new aid to the regime. He installed al-Qaeda in Libya, who’s atrocities are being ignored by the msm. At the same time he stands by and does nothing about Syria. Maybe it’s better if he doesn’t do anything. He does nothing about Iran, even when the opposition begged for some kind of support a few years back. Barry didn’t want to interfere in an internal country’s affairs. Unless it was Egypt of Libya of course.

It was a brazen perversion of the bible in order to further his unpopular agenda. As unpopular as it is though, he could still win in November. That speaks more to the Republicans than to him. This should have been the easiest road Republicans ever had to the White House. The people were fired up in 2010, there was a bloodbath in congress, and all the Repubicans had to do is grab the brass ring. Instead, we got Newt and Mitt, who are making this a down to the wire drama.

You can add blasphemy to the list of Obama gaffes, and still he might win in November.

A study conducted at Brock University in Ontario came up with the findings. The study was led by Gordon Hodson, a hack psychologist who more than likely cememted his tenure at the university. Following an unnamed number of children in England over a period of years, he has come to the conclusion that conservative equals prejudice, and a low I.Q. is the facilitator.

Low-intelligence adults tend to gravitate toward socially conservative ideologies, the study found. Those ideologies, in turn, stress hierarchy and resistance to change, attitudes that can contribute to prejudice, Hodson wrote in an email to LiveScience.

The study comes to the conclusion that not only are conservatives stupid and racist, but even dealing with a subject such as racism was just too challenging for the small minds of conservatives.

“This finding is consistent with recent research demonstrating that intergroup contact is mentally challenging and cognitively draining, and consistent with findings that contact reduces prejudice,” said Hodson, who along with his colleagues published these results online Jan. 5 in the journal Psychological Science.

You saw that right. You, my friend, are just too mentally challenged to deal with an issue like race. Not the Al Sharptons, or the Louis Farrakhans, or even Barack Obama and his buddy Jeremiah Wright. No, not them, but conservatives-who they singled out specifically, are just too stupid to deal with the issue on the intellectual level of the aformentioned race baiters.

I’ve documented on this blog many times the blatant and overt racism directed against whites. The only people that would actually buy the snake oil being sold with this study are the very people that they claim are not stupid and prejudiced. In the old days, the way to shut up whites and practice reverse discrimination unopposed is to accuse whites of racism. It didn’t have to be true, but the energy and time consumed fighting the accusation effectively ended any real conversation about race. That’s how you shut up a stupid hillbilly.

Basically, these clowns are blaming conservatives for the failure of the melting pot experiment. It’s a little late to change it now in the United States, and we’ll just have to deal with the various tribes jockeying for positions of power. No longer are we a nation under God, but a nation of disconnected special interests, each separate in their ideology and desires of what America should be. Of course, the conclusion I just drew is just the kind of attitude this study uses as proof that conservatives are dumb racists. There’s only one problem though: I’m right. In the most welcoming country on the face of the earth, all I ask is the expectation that those who come here embrace the ideas and culture of America. After all, we didn’t become number one embracing failed cultures around the world did we? There I go with my hillbilly diatribe again.

Is it rhetoric, or are these kinds of folks so blinded by their ideology that they can’t see that what is in some cases, the obvious. Take immigration that was mentioned in the linked article. Do they not see the damage being done, not only to America, but to the host countries losing their working class population? They do not see that. Do they not see that sharia law is incompatible with American values? They do not. I could go on and on. These clowns came to a conclusion based on cloudy data that they mined for themselves. Me…I can back up my argument, and if these researchers would like to debate it with me, then this stupid conservative will be happy to oblige.

Literally hours after offering amnesty to illegal aliens that served in the military, Newt took his open borders stance one step further on Wednesday. In an interview with Jorge reconquista Ramos of Univision, Gingrich proposed that after the military amnesty, that there should be a guest worker program to let everyone else stay. And I mean everyone.

“With most of them? I would urge them to get a guest-worker permit,” he said, calling for a substantial rewrite of immigration laws that would cancel existing penalties and instead let illegal immigrants stay.

The real Newt Gingrich couldn’t hide forever. He’s been open borders his entire career, so the get tough rhetoric in regards to securing the border never held water with those that know him. And I know him. So here’s how Newt will deal with immigration. For those that have been here a number of years-those identity stealers that managed to stay under the radar, they get to stay. If they join the military-presuming they actually speak English and would understand critical orders on the battlefield-they can stay. And for anybody that doesn’t fall into either of those categories, he proposes a guest worker program. That covers everyone, and under a Gingrich presidency, no illegal alien will have to leave. They can stay, have families-become part of the community, and eventually fall into one of the aforementioned amnesty groups.

Does Newt know something we don’t? Is he trying to siphon the illegal alien voter block being assembled by Obama’s ACORN goons? Don’t put it past him. The very fact that Gingrich’s immigration policy is undiscernable from Barack Obama’s should be cause for alarm to even the most ardent Gingrich supporter.

Newt’s sob story about the illegal alien that has been sucking up resources in the United States for 25 years apparently isn’t hurting his campaign. If you recall, during a debate he said that an identity stealing criminal that managed to not get deported for decades should be able to stay in the United States, along with the family that he created while here. On Monday, he took it a step further.

Newt Gingrich has his own version of the DREAM Act. If an illegal alien is willing to serve the country in uniform, Newt Gingrich would grant them citizenship. I’ve postulated before that the dramatic increase and pandering to illegal aliens was an effort to literally import an army that will be able to stand up to China in the years ahead. It’s not a matter of if, it’s when, and when that day comes, America is likely to be full of retired baby boomers and hurting for military personnel. Enter the illegal alien. With the numbers of illegal youth pouring into this country and the corresponding birth rates, they will have the manpower to face down a million man Chinese army in the coming decades. It’s just a theory that would be panned by many I’m sure, because most people aren’t thinking decades ahead. You can be sure an empire like the United States thinks decades into the future.

On the other hand, this could just be Newt looking at the cheap labor demographics change, and he’s just taking advantage. He’ll be long gone by the time America turns into a third world cesspool. Newt claims he’ll get tough on the border now, but his words this very campaign say something very different. So far, he’s give two separate scenarios where he would give amnesty. Can you articulate his position on securing the border and making sure illegal aliens will not take the jobs that Americans actually will do? He has no border plan, and wants to outsource E-Verify to Visa. Of course, if Newt was president, illegal aliens just might come out of the shadows, because amnesty and all the benefits of being an American citizen would await them.

It’s the same story with Newt, the same one he’s been telling for years. Just get here, and you’re in. Whoever you are, Newt will find a category in which to give you amnesty. And what about the families of these individuals? Newt already said he didn’t want to break up families. And if they happen to have had at least one child in the United States, they aren’t going anywhere anyway.

Yet Newt surges in the polls. Are those polls accurate? They seemed to be in South Carolina. Are Mitt, Rick and Ron so bad that only Newt is fit to face Obama? I would take any of those three over Newt in a heartbeat. I don’t think Obama feels the same way, which is why I questioned the poll numbers. If it was Obama/Gingrich, Obama would have another four years. He would be their dream opponent, considering the massive baggage he carries around. It would be a nightmare for the rest of us-unless of course, you happen to be an illegal alien…

On his way to Washington to speak at a sizable right to life rally, Tennessee Senator Rand Paul was detained at the Nashville airport after setting off one of the alarms. Rand had no weapons on him and offered to pass through again. The TSA denied him, instead demanding a pat down. Keep in mind, this is not just a guy off the street, it was Rand Paul and he was in his own back yard. When Rand refused to be groped by the Einsteins from the TSA, he was detained and missed his flight. Ultimately, he was allowed to pass through the scanners again and given the A-Ok.

In a country where trusted travelers from Mexico can pass through airports with no screening at all, a well known politician is detained ostensibly for the safety of others in the airport. You know, it might be nice if Rand’s dad brought this up at the next debate. No one has yet, the obvious insecurity at our airports, and our seaports, and the wide open border, and Fast and Furious, and Matricula Consular, and everything else that the candidates have not touched. Not one of them. If I were running for president, I would have brought up these issues at the start, but in the case of Ron Paul, better late than never. His boy was man-handled by the TSA. He will have a national stage to stoke some outrage over what the TSA engages in.

Nice going, not giving in Rand. Hopefully your martyrdom at the hands of the TSA will put this issue back in the headlines.

As the results pour in, it looks like Newt Gingrich will take the South Carolina primary in fairly easy fashion. After being left for dead just a few weeks ago in Iowa, Gingrich has pulled a disturbingly McCanian type comeback to take South Carolina and extend this nomination battle to at least one more state. But do the people really like Newt, or is there some other factor? If the exit polls are any indicator, there is definitely another factor.

According to an exit poll conducted by FOX, South Carolina voters feel Newt Gingrich is the man that can defeat Barack Obama. I looked at a few other exit polls, and they’re pretty similar. Sure, Newt would tear Barry apart in a debate, but of course, we know Newt would never get a chance. At least not the Lincoln-Douglas type debates he’s seeking. But, knowing that Obama can’t string together two sentences without a teleprompter, all Newt would likely need is a few conventional debates to make mince meat of Obama. As I understand it, that’s all anyone will get, two debates. And if some kind of crisis should develop between now and November, they may not even get that. In the meantime, all the garbage that Gingrich has collected over the years would be on full display, day after day, after day, after day…

Not that South Carolina voters are unaware of not only the baggage Gingrich has amassed, but the dirty way he does business even now. Of course, they think Romney is even dirtier, maybe going back to Iowa, but then, what do you actually need to make up about Newt Gingrich? The super pac that has Newt’s fingerprints all over it puts out more lies than truth. Looks like it paid off. That’s not the worst of it though.

If South Carolinians didn’t seem dazed and confused enough by giving Gingrich a victory, consider the fact that 90% of Gingrich voters either strongly or somewhat support the tea party movement. Strange, considering Gingrich slammed the tea party and considers it a threat to the good old boys network of current Republican failures. And Newt’s recent fails are well documented. Paul Ryan could tell you. Newt thinks his common sense entitlement restructuring plan is social engineering.. Doug Hoffman could tell you too. Newt supported a raging Democrat masquerading as a Republican in New York. He even asked Rick Santorum to bow out, even when Santorum had Iowa under his belt at the time and Newt had nothing. But the voters think Newt is the guy.

Luckily, with the volatility of this primary, past trends are out the window. I don’t think South Carolina will have a bearing on who the eventual nominee will be, although…voters wanted Gingrich because they think he can win, not necessarily because they like him. That’s something Mitt Romney doesn’t have in his corner. As for Santorum and Paul? They just don’t have the support. They just wouldn’t beat Obama. I don’t think that’s necessarily true, especially in the case of Santorum. Look, conservatives are going to line up behind whoever gets the nomination, and if the exit polls are correct, most people don’t have a big problem with Santorum. He might be more morally conservative than people are comfortable with, but as a candidate, as a man, at least he’s not disliked, which is not the case with either Gingrich or Romney.

It’s realistically down to those two though. Funny, the two that draw the most opposition are also the frontrunners. I don’t think Gingrich can win. His record would be on full display in a general election, and the Obama campaign would make sure a real debate would never happen. Romney is so wishy-washy that he just wouldn’t draw the enthusiasm, although I can’t imagine anyone being undecided between Romney and Obama. I don’t think Romney would break anything. I don’t think he would fix anything to any degree, but at least we wouldn’t have to worry about him transforming the country. If whoever the candidate was just focused on undoing the damage Obama has wrought, that would be good enough for me. That’s all I can expect from a politician.

When Obama was installed in 2008, one of his first crony picks was Cecilia Munoz as Intergovernmental affairs director. Munoz, the former Senior vice President of the National Council of La Raza (NCLR), a vehement anti-American ethnic hate group quickly made good use of her new position. At the time, I wasn’t sure what that position entailed technically, and after Munoz was through…I still don’t know what the actual job entails.

We know what she did while in that position though. According to Judicial watch, the taxpayer funded pipeline of money to NCLR doubled the year she came on board, from $4.1 million to $11 million. The majority of that money came from the Department of Labor, headed by Hilda Solis, yet another anti-American racist that has her hands on millions of dollars of taxpayer money. She took that money and handed it over to NCLR, while issuing guidelines protecting migrant workers. As of today, I don’t know of anything she’s done to benefit the American worker. Of course, if you ask Solis, la raza is the real American worker and she can claim she’s done plenty.

Munoz routed millions of dollars more to la raza in the form of grants to front organizations with the exact same agenda as NCLR. Exactly the same, because they were the same. Now, Munoz will be able to shape domestic policy in the United States, and if her track record is any indicator then we’ll all need to brush up on our Spanish.

Obama didn’t pass amnesty, but he’s made sure the Justice Department cracks down on any state that dares defend itself from illegal immigration, fights any and all voter ID laws that would weed out fraudulent votes, he’s lied about border security, and even more recently he’s lied about the number of deportations that the administration is currently bragging about. Just as I suspected. He’s had the likes of Munoz and Solis there the entire time to further weaken the sovereignty of this country. And you can be sure it has been weakened.

Check out the Judicial Watch web site. It’ll knock your socks off, and not in a good way. We hear this and that from the Republican candidates on building a fence, blah, blah, blah, but we hear nothing about this. we have a parallel government that supports illegal aliens and it is completely funded by the American taxpayer. So far, all of the candidates have dropped the ball on this issue, and unless the idea is to not piss off the la raza voting block before November, I don’t see much changing, whoever gets into the White House. Of course, I could be wrong. Most presidents have a very detailed agenda that doesn’t go over in the world of media soundbites. Sure, all those Republican candidates might have a plan to deal with this mess, but so far, I haven’t seen it.

The Gallup poll shows that 40% of Americans see themselves as conservative, 35% moderate, and 21% as liberal. Apparently, there are some people that have no political persuasion at all. This is the third year running that more Americans have called themselves conservative, and even before that, moderates still outnumbered liberals by far.

No surprise that conservatism rose in the three years since Obama has taken office. What was lost in moderates was gained with conservatives. Liberalism has increased as well, but still lags well behind both moderates and conservatives. So how did Obama end up in the White House?

Let’s do the math. 40% + 35% = center-right. Libs make up 21%, nowhere near the kinds of numbers that could propel the likes of Obama to victory. So how then?

Rarely is there a single reason for a situation such as this. Let’s look at a few factors that at least contributed to this debacle. First off, George Bush was no conservative per se, he was a crony capitalist. Cheap labor from open borders and selling off every piece of America he could get his hands on was in diametric opposition to the will of the American people. The Republicans in Congress were no better, and they were punished by America, either by emboldening the liberals to come out and vote or by dis-inspiring conservative voters. The last straw may have been John McCain as the best they could offer. Then there was the ACORN factor. We can’t discount that. They were caught red-handed engaging in voter fraud in multiple states. How many states went to Obama as a result of ACORN chicanery can only be estimated.

If you really want to dig deep, we know that there were voting anomalies across the nation via electronic voting machines, and those machines remain in place today. Doug Hoffman in New York can tell you what a real issue that is. Then we have the voters that shouldn’t be voting. We go back to open borders. We know illegal aliens are voting, but like ACORN fraud, we can only estimate the impact.

I’m sure that anybody reading this can come up with even more reasons that contributed to an Obama victory. But that’s how fast it can happen In 75% center-right country, a guy who still hasn’t come up with a legitimate birth certificate, has sealed his academic records, his passport information, and thus his citizenship info when he was a student, was a disciple of a racist, and vehement anti-American in the form of Jeremiah Wright, started his political career in the home of terrorist Bill Ayers, and no executive experience whatsoever, became President of the United States. Conservatives had become complacent, but like the open borders crowd, the Saul Alinsky, socialist/commie/nanny state crowd was laser focused on their goal. That’s it, they have a goal. If you have a goal, and you’re focused on that goal, you’ll probably succeed. The good news is that although the Obama contingent still have their goal of turning this country into a third world socialist nightmare, conservatives-and moderates for that matter now have their own goal: Getting rid of Obama and his liberal minority, and restoring the values that made this country great. We just need to focus that goal with more than just a general idea though. If you need some ideas of where to focus, check out this blog or any of the others on the blogroll.

With 75% of the population, we have the numbers easily by far. Sure, Obama is going to lie, cheat and connive to get himself another four years, but the reality is, he can’t take us all. November 2010 showed us that. We have an idea of how an imposter like Barack Obama got into the White House. To make sure that doesn’t happen again, all we have to do is show up. But we do have to show up. So when you see the Republican candidates slapping each other around, keep in mind, in the end, it’s anybody but Obama. We’ll start there and move forward.

All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent.
Thomas Jefferson

Mitt Romney’s time at Bain Capital is public record, so it should have been no problem getting the facts on just what he did during his time there. In fact, it is no problem at all. For Newt Gingrich that created a problem out of thin air. For everything else that’s wrong with Mitt Romney, he did manage to create jobs while at Bain. But a super pac-run by former Gingrich staffers have a totally different spin on what Romney did. They even went as far as concocting a documentary, chronicling the activities of the corporate vulture as he destroyed lives in the name of profit. Focusing on a few companies in South Carolina, Newt thought he had the formula to not only destroy Romney in the latest battleground, but to present himself as the consevative’s conservative, in contrast to the moderate Romney. Unfortunately for Gingrich, the Voters of South Carolina aren’t the dumb hicks he took them to be and the blowback is propelling Romney to almost certain victory in South Carolina.

Like something out of a Barack Obama campaign attack, the super pac’s film mercilessly attacks not only Romney, but capitalism itself. Because Bain couldn’t save every company it bought, that constituted an attack on American workers from the evil capitalists at Bain. Gingrich has met such severe oppositon to the film that he’s now flip-flopped, and wants the film either edited, or nixed all together. Not only have the voters of South Carolina torn the film apart, but even the main stream media has panned it. You would think the msm would have an interest in watching the Repulicans tear themselves apart, but not even they could tacitly approve the outright falsehoods portrayed in the film.

The Washington Post’s Glenn Kessler’s awarded the video “Four Pinocchios” in his assessment, which puts “King of Bain” in a class of the worst offenders with “significant factual error[s].”
Politifact, a Pulitzer-prize winning project of the St. Petersburg Times, said two claims in the film were “mostly false.”

Too late Newt. The latest polls show Mitt Romney widening his lead in South Carolina, a disastrous development for the Gingrich campaign. With a checkered past and now a just as checkered present, Newt Gingrich should be finished. In fact, if not for donations from some rich crony that he will no doubt owe, Gingrich would already be done.

Yes, we can now add liar to the long list of negatives attributed to Newt Gingrich. I don’t know how many more articles I need to write to help finish this guy off, but I’ll write as many as I have to. Nice job Newt, I’m sure Mitt Romney thanks you.